Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 May 29#Template:Category interwiki

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep - there are enough articles where he's the principal actor and not part of a large team. (nac) Alakzi (talk) 01:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Rob Pike navbox}}

Template creep: navbox that summarizes the CV of an (admittedly high-profile) computer programmer. All articles linked from this template already link to Pike and many of them have several other navboxes. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

• I don't understand where Template Creep applies—there's but a single template on the page, and the "Avoid template creep" essay is about "the tendency for some Wikipedia articles ... to become gradually cluttered with templates". Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 08:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
• There are three navboxes on Go (programming language). There are also three on Plan 9 from Bell Labs, as apparently nobody has bothered to add the Ken Thompson navbox to it. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 19:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
• ... and UTF-8 has four. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 19:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
• You're saying that three navboxes is too many? That's a bit hard to swallow—it's not even enough to justify a {{tl|navboxes}}. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 20:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
• Keep - There appear to be enough articles with strong enough ties to support a navbox. Sometimes people will want to go from one subject to another without going through Pike's article; the navbox allows this. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:19, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 June 9. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:56, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by {{admin|Iridescent}} AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

:{{Tfd links|Infobox Rabbi/doc}}

{{no redirect|Template:Infobox Rabbi}} is a redirect to Template:Infobox Jewish leader (it was changed to a redirect with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_Rabbi&diff=326206858&oldid=308045312 this edit of 16 November 2009]), and this is left as an orphan. Si Trew (talk). The redirect itself is only used on three pages, but that's a case for WP:RFD. 07:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

• Tagged for speedy deletion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.