Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 15

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn as per request at my user talk. Listifying can be done by any interested editor when template deletion isn't bundled together with it. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Appalachian State Mountaineers quarterback navbox}}

Delete or Listify. Of the 20 quarterbacks listed in this navbox, only six have articles; the rest aren't even redlinked (probably because they will never meet WP:NCOLLATH). If you think about it, this makes sense, since no college program in its history is going to have all (or even a majority) of its quarterbacks be notable enough to meet WP:NCOLLATH. Per WP:NAV, unlinked entries should be avoided in navboxes; a proliferation of redlinks is also discouraged. I think this is a perfect example of where a list would be much more appropriate than a navbox. In a list article there is no issue with having redlinked and unlinked names. In fact, we already have :Category:Lists of college football quarterbacks which has far fewer articles than we have navboxes in :Category:American college football quarterback navigational boxes. Note that no List of Appalachian State Mountaineers starting quarterbacks existed as of the posting of this TfD, and the title link for the navbox was to Appalachian State Mountaineers football. –Grondemar 15:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

:Listify, keep, and remove the unlinked names from the template. As per my earlier comment [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_College_football&type=revision&diff=753751508&oldid=753581270 here]. Ejgreen77 (talk) 04:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn as per request at my user talk. Listifying can be done by any interested editor when template deletion isn't bundled together with it. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Akron Zips quarterback navbox}}

Delete or Listify. Of the 16 quarterbacks listed in this navbox, only four have articles; the rest aren't even redlinked (probably because they will never meet WP:NCOLLATH). If you think about it, this makes sense, since no college program in its history is going to have all (or even a majority) of its quarterbacks be notable enough to meet WP:NCOLLATH. Per WP:NAV, unlinked entries should be avoided in navboxes; a proliferation of redlinks is also discouraged. I think this is a perfect example of where a list would be much more appropriate than a navbox. In a list article there is no issue with having redlinked and unlinked names. In fact, we already have :Category:Lists of college football quarterbacks which has far fewer articles than we have navboxes in :Category:American college football quarterback navigational boxes. Note that no List of Akron Zips starting quarterbacks existed as of the posting of this TfD, and the title link for the navbox was to Akron Zips football. –Grondemar 03:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

:Listify, keep, and remove the unlinked names from the template. As per my earlier comment [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_College_football&type=revision&diff=753751508&oldid=753581270 here]. Ejgreen77 (talk) 04:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn as per request at my user talk. Listifying can be done by any interested editor when template deletion isn't bundled together with it. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Air Force Falcons quarterback navbox}}

Delete or Listify. Of the 25 quarterbacks listed in this navbox, only four have articles; the rest aren't even redlinked (probably because they will never meet WP:NCOLLATH). If you think about it, this makes sense, since no college program in its history is going to have all (or even a majority) of its quarterbacks be notable enough to meet WP:NCOLLATH. Per WP:NAV, unlinked entries should be avoided in navboxes; a proliferation of redlinks is also discouraged. I think this is a perfect example of where a list would be much more appropriate than a navbox. In a list article there is no issue with having redlinked and unlinked names. In fact, we already have :Category:Lists of college football quarterbacks which has far fewer articles than we have navboxes in :Category:American college football quarterback navigational boxes. Note that no List of Air Force Falcons starting quarterbacks existed as of the posting of this TfD, and the title link for the navbox was to Air Force Falcons football. –Grondemar 03:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

:Listify, keep, and remove the unlinked names from the template. As per my earlier comment [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_College_football&type=revision&diff=753751508&oldid=753581270 here]. Ejgreen77 (talk) 04:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn as per request at my user talk. Listifying can be done by any interested editor when template deletion isn't bundled together with it. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Connecticut Huskies quarterback navbox}}

Delete or Listify. Of the 14 quarterbacks listed in this navbox, only four have articles; the rest aren't even redlinked (probably because they will never meet WP:NCOLLATH). If you think about it, this makes sense, since no college program in its history is going to have all (or even a majority) of its quarterbacks be notable enough to meet WP:NCOLLATH. Per WP:NAV, unlinked entries should be avoided in navboxes; a proliferation of redlinks is also discouraged. I think this is a perfect example of where a list would be much more appropriate than a navbox. In a list article there is no issue with having redlinked and unlinked names. In fact, we already have :Category:Lists of college football quarterbacks which has far fewer articles than we have navboxes in :Category:American college football quarterback navigational boxes. Note that no List of Connecticut Huskies starting quarterbacks existed as of the posting of this TfD, and the title link for the navbox was to Connecticut Huskies football. –Grondemar 03:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

:Listify, keep, and remove the unlinked names from the template. As per my earlier comment [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_College_football&type=revision&diff=753751508&oldid=753581270 here]. Ejgreen77 (talk) 04:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Israeli Jews Infobox}}

This isn't an infobox... Not really sure what the point of it is. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
• substitute and delete, ethnicity based image arrays were deprecated and deleted some time back. Frietjes (talk) 19:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Subprefectures of São Paulo}}

single-use template, can be merged with the article. Frietjes (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Popular visitor attractions in São Paulo}}

unused and duplicates {{tl|Visitor attractions in São Paulo}} Frietjes (talk) 18:44, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Presidential Domestic Programs}}

This template is not used. Drdpw (talk) 16:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|NPSL Team Infobox}}

This should be replaced with just {{tl|Infobox football club}}. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

• replace/delete, redundant. Frietjes (talk) 18:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 23 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Infobox EN Standard Details}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|KL-RTS Route RapidKL Infobox}}

Unused template. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Lan Xang Monarchs Infobox}}

If anything this should be a navbox... Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:00, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Knight's Cross recipients of SxG 10}}

Template contains one entry. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:45, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 23 (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Infobox former country|type=merge}}
• {{Tfd links|Infobox country|type=merge}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).