Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 4#Template:Infobox EN Standard Details

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Asian Winter Games Bandy}}

Unnecessary, as the event has only been held once (and likely won't be held anytime soon either). Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. No navigational use. Jellyman (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 12 ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Scratch Perverts}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Unblocked}}

Same rationale as this TfD which recently closed as delete. Wholly redundant to {{tl|Unblock reviewed}}, as this is just a hard-coded instance of that template. This template should be substituted and deleted. It's intended to be substitute-only already, according to the documentation. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• Keep as a harmless and useful time saving wrapper for unblock reviewed (that automatically includes a pro-forma 'reason' and selects the 'accepted' parameter), intended to be substituted when unblocking for self-evident reasons already present on the talk page. Unless we have started running out of template space? –xeno^talk 15:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
  
• KEEP Per above. --Brynda1231 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Brynda1231 Talk Page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Brynda1231 Contribs 05:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 19 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Infobox EN Standard Details}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).