Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 23#Template:Hull & Barnsley Railway (inline)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Khowar_language}}
• {{tfd links|Khowar_language_sidebar}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 11:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|List_of_role-playing_video_games}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure) J947^{(c) (m)} 03:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Infobox_Dalai_Lama}}
• {{tfd links|Infobox_religious_biography}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Infobox LLWSQualifiers-Pre2001}}

Unused template Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

• Comment: {{tl|Infobox_LLWSQualifiers}} should probably have the same keep/delete fate as this template. It's also unused, and both templates are recommended for use at WikiProject Baseball/Little_League_task_force. The task force page has been inactive for a few years, but here's a ping to taskforce member User:JB82. JB82 is still actively editing, and active on this topic. Alsee (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
• Keep: It's less arduous than creating a table (and probably less time-consuming, too). --JB82 (talk) 01:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
• JB82, the template is unused. I pinged you and posted on the Little League wikiproject to see if there was any likelihood it was going to used in the foreseeable future. However looking more closely at the Little League wikiproject, I suddenly realize that it never actually existed. I couldn't find a single instance of dialog in the last 11 years. Out of the handful of edits there, several were bots or people passing through on maintenance tasks. Alsee (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
• Alright, then... --JB82 (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

• Delete as unused. It's also undocumented, and is not an infobox. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
• delete, unused, not needed, and not an infobox. Frietjes (talk) 14:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure) J947^{(c) (m)} 03:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Infobox_carom_billiards_player}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Ontario crown corporations}}

Existence of this template is redundant since Template:ONGovDept already includes a comprehensive list of provincial Crown agencies and Crown corporations. {{nowrap|RA0808 ^talk_contribs}} 16:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

:Delete (creator of template) Daylen (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

• delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Australia at the Commonwealth Games}}

{{hide|headerstyle=background:#ccccff|style=width: 40%|Full list|

• {{t|Anguilla at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Antigua and Barbuda at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Australia at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Australia at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Azerbaijan at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Bahamas at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Bangladesh at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Barbados at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Belgium at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Belize at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Bermuda at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Botswana at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|British Virgin Islands at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Brunei at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Cameroon at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Canada at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Canada at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Cayman Islands at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Cook Islands at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Cyprus at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Dominica at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|England at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Falkland Islands at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Fiji at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|France at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Ghana at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Gibraltar at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Great Britain at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Grenada at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Guernsey at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Guyana at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|India at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Isle of Man at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Israel at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Italy at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Jamaica at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Japan at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Jersey at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Kenya at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Lesotho at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Macedonia at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Malawi at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Malaya at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Malaysia at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Malta at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Mauritius at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Mixed teams at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Mozambique at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Namibia at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Nauru at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Netherlands at the Olympics}}
• {{t|New Zealand at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Nigeria at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Niue at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Norfolk Island at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Northern Ireland at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Norway at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Pakistan at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Papua New Guinea at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Saint Helena at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Saint Kitts and Nevis at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Saint Lucia at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Samoa at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Scotland at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Serbia at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Seychelles at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Sierra Leone at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Singapore at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Solomon Islands at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|South Africa at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Spain at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Sri Lanka at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Swaziland at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Sweden at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Tanzania at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Thailand at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Tonga at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Trinidad and Tobago at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Turkey at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Turks and Caicos Islands at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Tuvalu at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Uganda at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|United States at the Olympics}}
• {{t|Vanuatu at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Wales at the Commonwealth Games}}
• {{t|Zambia at the Commonwealth Games}}

}}

These templates (87 in total) are simply wrappers for {{t|country at games navbox}}. The main template updates automatically, meaning each of these templates are just shells. Another reason is to prevent the unnecessary creation of these templates, as demonstrated by the deletion of 20 similar unused templates. As a note, while I am advocating for deletion of these templates, obviously they should be subst'ed/replaced to keep the information itself on the page (which I'm happy to do). Primefac (talk) 16:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Red Star Belgrade squad 1991 European Cup Final}}

As per WP:FOOTY consensus, we only have historical squad navboxes for international tournaments, not for club competitions. Jellyman (talk) 15:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per consensus on WP:FOOTY. S.A. Julio (talk) 15:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per past consensus. – PeeJay 10:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Spain Squad EuroBasket 1959}}
• {{Tfd links|Spain Squad EuroBasket 1975}}

Per prior consensus we don't need roster boxes for teams that didn't medal in the competition. Frietjes (talk) 14:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

• Delete, navbox creep. We don't need a squad template for every team in every competition. That would cause an explosion at the bottom of articles for players with a long career. If someone wants to know who was on which squad, we can put that in the articles. The standard bar for a squad navbox is if it is a championship team for a significant competition. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Spain Squad 2014 FIBA Basketball World Cup}}

Per prior consensus we don't need roster boxes for teams that didn't medal in the competition. Frietjes (talk) 14:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

• All the squads that competes at this World Cup have their own template. I absolutely disagree with this proposed delation. Puente aereo (talk) 13:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
• Delete, navbox creep. We don't need a squad template for every team in every competition. That would cause an explosion at the bottom of articles for players with a long career. If someone wants to know who was on which squad, we can put that in the articles. The standard bar for a squad navbox is if it is a championship team for a significant competition. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:TCREEP. Teams should earn a medal at a minimum. How many of these bios mention a fourth place finish in their leads?—Bagumba (talk) 09:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Spain Squad 1950 FIBA World Championship}}
• {{Tfd links|Spain Squad 1974 FIBA World Championship}}
• {{Tfd links|Spain Squad 1982 FIBA World Championship}}
• {{Tfd links|Spain Squad 1986 FIBA World Championship}}
• {{Tfd links|Spain Squad 1990 FIBA World Championship}}
• {{Tfd links|Spain Squad 1994 FIBA World Championship}}
• {{Tfd links|Spain Squad 1998 FIBA World Championship}}
• {{Tfd links|Spain Squad 2002 FIBA World Championship}}
• {{Tfd links|Russia Squad 2002 FIBA World Championship}}

Per prior consensus we don't need roster boxes for teams that didn't medal in the competition. Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

• All the squads that competes at the FIBA World Championship have their own template. I absolutely disagree with this proposed delation. Puente aereo (talk) 13:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
• not according to prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 14:42, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
• Delete, navbox creep. We don't need a squad template for every team in every competition. That would cause an explosion at the bottom of articles for players with a long career. If someone wants to know who was on which squad, we can put that in the articles. The standard bar for a squad navbox is if it is a championship team for a significant competition. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:TCREEP, as well as prior consensus cited in nom. Teams that do not earn a medal do not need the Wikipedia equivalent of a participation award.—Bagumba (talk) 08:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by {{admin|Cyp}} AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Most populous cities in the Republic of India }}

Duplicates the function of Template:Million-plus agglomerations in India. DrKay (talk) 07:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

• The template Template:Most populous cities in the Republic of India showcases only the top 20 populated cities of India. Rishabsingh.nitt (talk) 07:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
• Like Template:Largest cities of India? DrKay (talk) 08:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
• Keep Please delete the template Template:Largest cities of India as it is outdated. The template Template:Most populous cities in the Republic of India has the updated census details.please check this article List of million-plus urban agglomerations in India. Rishabsingh.nitt (talk) 18:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
• That's not how we do things here. We edit the old template not create a new one. You're essentially suggesting a cut-and-paste move alongside deletion of the attribution history, which is in violation of the licensing terms: Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DrKay (talk) 06:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
• Okay. Go ahead. Delete the template Template:Most populous cities in the Republic of India. Rishabsingh.nitt (talk) 09:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
• Delete duplicate of Template:Largest cities of India, and as explained above, WP:CWW. --Muhandes (talk) 22:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Hull & Barnsley Railway (inline)}}

Unused. Use {{tl|Hull & Barnsley Railway}} instead. Jc86035 (talk) 04:46, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

• delete, was probably a useful fork at one point in time, but it's not needed now. Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).