Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 July 14#Template:Media by uploader

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 15:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 1/2 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 7 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 8 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 9/9A RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 11/12/13 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 21/23 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 24/25 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 28/29/29B RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 30 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 32 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 33/33A/33B RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 35/36 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 38/39 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 41 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 44/45 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 49/50 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 51/53/55 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 52/52A RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 57/58 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 60/62 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 61 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 85/86 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 92/93/94 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 95 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 96 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus 101/102 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus U1/U2 RDT|module=}}
• {{Tfd links|Cardiff Bus X91 RDT|module=}}

All ununsed, non notable bus routes and unlikely to ever be used in the future. Ajf773 (talk) 23:52, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

• delete, unused and not notable. WP is not a travel guide. Frietjes (talk) 15:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Angola Men Basketball Squad 2012 Summer Olympics|module=}}

Consensus is to have squad templates for the Olympics but not Olympic qualifiers; Angola did not qualify for the 2012 Olympics Joeykai (talk) 13:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

• delete per prior consensus. not a notable squad. Frietjes (talk) 13:23, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 15:58, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Footpaths in Scotland|module=}}

A template is not suitable for what is fundamentally an open-ended category. Currently it lists a random selection of paths, including some (but not all) of the official Scotland's Great Trails, and some other routes, e.g. the Old military roads of Scotland, or the Clachlet Traverse. Given that there is free access to all land in Scotland this could in theory be nearly infinite. A category (which exists, see :Category:Footpaths in Scotland) is the best way to organise these articles. Grinner (talk) 09:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. '''[[User:TomasTomasTomas|⠀^TOMÁSTOMÁS_TOMÁS]]⠀[[User talk:TomasTomasTomas|TALK⠀]]''' 16:14, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}


Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:05, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:04, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 00:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Presumed self|module=}}

I'm putting this template up for deletion (despite it being in use) on the grounds that although intended as a pragmatic reponse to a situation of unclear sourcing/authorship it's not necessarily having the desired outcome in that other than a small number of cases, it's not actually assisting in clarifying anything, and is merely "moving the back log around" which is not a sustainable long term solution. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. A vague template that is not really serving a useful purpose. — This, that and the other (talk) 10:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 23. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 16:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Media_by_uploader}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).