Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 November 23#Template:NowCommonsBot

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 23:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|PFC Spartak Nalchik squad}}

Navbox of a football club whose players were determined here not to be fully pro and therefore not notable. Most of the articles are being deleted as we speak, and of the two remaining players, both of them don't appear to have played for any WP:FPLs. ミラP 19:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:02, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, does not serve its purpose as a navigation box. GiantSnowman 10:04, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 23:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|50 largest US magazines}}

Based on arbitrary criteria, not supported by any WP:RS that we should include the top 50. Also, very volatile as circulation continously changes so we have to update the template more often. List already does a decent job. Störm (talk) 18:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• delete, better to use a list article. Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
• Delete, reason here dibbydib ^💬/_✏ 22:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 23:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|50 largest US banks}}

Based on arbitrary criteria, not supported by any WP:RS that we should include the top 50. Also, very volatile with each quarterly report we have to update the template. List already does a decent job. Störm (talk) 18:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• delete, better to use a list article. Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|RFCUsummary}}

This template is unused and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct has been closed down so this template will not ever be useful. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|RFAReview}}

Unused template and unnecessary because Wikipedia:RfA Review hasn't been active in over 11 years. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• Comment No particular objection, necessarily, as the project is well and truly inactive. I'd suggest that marking the template as historical or moving its contents to a subpage of WP:RFAR would harm little, and would preserve part of the overall effort, should we attempt something similar in the future. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 02:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|RBE}}

Unused foreign language template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|R&B and Soul Music Selected biography}}

Portal:R&B and Soul Music no longer exists and has been superseded by Portal:Rhythm and blues so this template is useless and it is unused. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Blanked by author Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Queen Manthatisi (ca.1784-1836}}

Unused and useless template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• Comment This was originally a draft, and there may be some content that could be salvageable or copyright concerns if this gets deleted. Haven't investigated it further. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 01:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Puir}}

This template is based on :Template:PUIresolved which has been deleted. This template is not required because when it is substed, it will attempt to subst :Template:PUIresolved which has been deleted. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Prism dual polyhedra db}}

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Portal editable}}

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:49, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• delete, not needed, and if this feature is useful, it could be added as an option to Module:Portal without using a separate template. Frietjes (talk) 17:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Portal editable/Images/Switzerland}}
• {{Tfd links|Portal editable/Images/Default}}

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• delete, not needed, and if this feature is useful, it could be added as an option to Module:Portal without using a separate template. Frietjes (talk) 17:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete dependent page of a page which does not exist. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|PWBSPpages}}

This unused template only contains red links from a deleted portal so it is useless. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|PWBSApages}}

This unused template only contains red links from a deleted portal so it is useless. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|PWBSAC-instructions}}

This unused template only contains red links from a deleted portal so it is useless. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by User:Fastily (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Trams portal/FA image}}

This template is unused and Portal:Trams has been deleted so this template is useless. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|PIIMSAC-instructions}}

This unused template only contains red links for a deleted portal and has no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:28, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|PHPSPpages}}

This template only contains red links from a deleted portal. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Observances}}

Unused template and redundant to the function of {{MonthCategoryNav|topic=observances}} Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete dependent page of a page which does not exist. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:26, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|OWShubmaps}}

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|NowCommonsBot}}

This template was previously used by User:MetsBot but that bot has been indefinitely blocked. It is currently unused and I don't think that there is a use for this template in the future. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|NowCommonsReviewed}}

This template was previously used by User:MetsBot but that bot has been indefinitely blocked. It is currently unused and I don't think there is a use for this template in the future. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Note link}}

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Note-start}}

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Primera División de Fútbol Profesional – Apertura 2015 table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Serbian SuperLiga Championship Round table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Serbian SuperLiga Regular Season table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Serbian SuperLiga Relegation Round table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 South-East Amateur Football League table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 South-West Amateur Football League table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Superleague Greece Regular Season table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Superleague Greece UEFA play-offs table}}
• {{Tfd links|2017 PLA East standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2017 PLA West standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2017–18 Serbian SuperLiga Championship Round table}}
• {{Tfd links|2017–18 Serbian SuperLiga Regular Season table}}
• {{Tfd links|2017–18 Serbian SuperLiga Relegation Round table}}
• {{Tfd links|2018–19 Slovenian PrvaLiga table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Northern Football League Division One table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Northern Football League Division Two table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Oberliga Hamburg table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Primera División de Fútbol Profesional season Apertura table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Primera División de Fútbol Profesional season Clausura table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Primera División de Fútbol Profesional season table}}

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 15:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:02, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 10:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|2017 CONCACAF U-17 Championship – Group A standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2017 CONCACAF U-17 Championship – Group B standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2017 CONCACAF U-17 Championship – Group C standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2017 CONCACAF U-17 Championship – Group D standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2017 CONCACAF U-17 Championship – Group E standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2017 CONCACAF U-17 Championship qualifying – Central American zone standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2017 CONCACAF U-17 Championship templates|catfd=y}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 North-West Amateur Football League table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 North-East Amateur Football League Relegation Round table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 North-East Amateur Football League Regular Season table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 North-East Amateur Football League Championship Round table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 North West Counties Football League Premier Division table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 North West Counties Football League Division One table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 National League table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 National League South table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 National League North table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 MDFA Elite Division table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Maltese Premier League table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Luxembourg National Division table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Isthmian League Premier Division table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Isthmian League Division One South table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Isthmian League Division One North table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Hellenic Football League Premier Division table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Hellenic Football League Division One West table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Hellenic Football League Division One East table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Ekstraklasa Relegation Round table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Ekstraklasa Regular Season table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Ekstraklasa Championship Round table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Cypriot First Division Relegation Round table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Cypriot First Division Regular Season table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016–17 Cypriot First Division Championship Round table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016 SAFF Women's Championship Group B table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016 SAFF Women's Championship Group A table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016 PLA West standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2016 PLA East standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2016 LFF I Lyga}}
• {{Tfd links|2016 Japan Football League table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016 Japan Football League second stage table}}
• {{Tfd links|2016 Japan Football League first stage table}}
• {{Tfd links|2015 Japan Football League table}}

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:02, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 10:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Major English-language Science and Technology Magazines}}

See previous discussion for reference, started by the same user on major current affair, arts, busines magazines. Selective navigation, no criteria which magazine to include (very subjective), fails WP:NAVBOX. Störm (talk) 06:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:NAVBOX#3: The articles do not refer to each other to a reasonable extent. Category-based navigation is sufficient, and if any sci/tech publication is particularly relevant to another, either reference in prose or the See also section. czar 23:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
• Keep I love navboxes and this would be very convenient for navigating between related magazines; or,

:Alternatively, convert to a portal, maybe? (Half in jest, but thought I'd tag {{u|BrownHairedGirl}} here...maybe she'll get the [dark? dry?] humour.) Doug Mehus T·C 22:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

• delete much better to use :Category:Science and technology magazines which (1) doesn't require WP:OR to determine what is "major" and (2) doesn't require manual update each time an article about a magazine is created/deleted. I also note that the entries of :Category:Science and technology magazines do not match the entries of this template (probably due to the issues outlined in 1 and 2). Frietjes (talk) 14:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).