Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 December 18#Template:Direct link

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 26. (non-admin closure) –Piranha249 19:52, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|American_Chess_Masters}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:39, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Inkubus Sukkubus}}

All the band's albums were redirected for being unsourced (some up to 15 years) with absolutely no claims of importance, so after removing all those links, now the template has only links to related topics like Neopaganism and Goth subculture. Doesn't need to still exist. Ss112 19:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete: Per nom, no navigational assistance is provided anymore. -- 2pou (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 12:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 26. (non-admin closure) –Piranha249 15:56, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Walt_Disney_Television}}
• {{tfd links|Disney}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Tortured Souls}}

Propose deletion: Now that five

separate

AfD discussions

resulted in

redirects

to the main franchise page, this Navbox no longer provides navigational assistance. The creators are captured in the franchise page already, and the "Related" links seem to be related only by Barker or McFarlane except for the Animae Damnatae link. Even that; however, has been suggested for merging by {{u|Dronebogus}}, and even if not merged, there is still not much navigational assitance provided anymore. Deleting this template was also recommended by {{u|Clarityfiend}} in the first AfD linked. -2pou (talk) 17:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete I nominated all the articles above for deletion and agree that there is no longer any use for this Navbox. Dronebogus (talk) 12:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 25. (non-admin closure) –Piranha249 15:07, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Batsmen_with_a_Test_batting_average_above_50}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under criterion G7, deletion performed by User:Fastily. (non-admin closure) PorkchopGMX (talk • contribs • Merry Christmas!) 16:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Direct link}}

Generally unnecessary. There is flatly nothing wrong with links pointing as and where they should and being tracked accordingly. Izno (talk) 02:26, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Poorly documented, poorly named ("wikilink actions" should be better, imo). Maybe I don't understand what this template should be used for; I've only seen it in action at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atom&oldid=994409164 Atom] and I did not like it. It's disguised as a wikilink, but cannot be edited in VE as such, and with actions added may send the reader where no other wikilinks do. IDK if any harmful actions can be added to it, I hope not. It spoils the format of article preview popups. Delete, unless a really good use case is found for it. Ponor (talk) 13:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
• {{u|Izno}}, template creator has requested G7 speedy deletion so I think you can go ahead and delete the template yourself. PorkchopGMX (talk • contribs • Merry Christmas!) 14:14, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
• : I'd personally prefer not to. G7s have a habit of returning under different names, and while sometimes that's ok, I am so not a fan of this template that I'd prefer an XFD removal. --Izno (talk) 14:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Narendra Modi navbar}}

Redundant to :Template: Narendra Modi series was created recently and being spammed on pages that already has the former template. Walrus Ji (talk) 01:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

: {{Pass}} The template should be passed as the earlier one was a sidebar and the new one is a navbox. The earlier one describes his policies while the new one is related to personal life.गहराई (talk) 02:55, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete. Entirely redundant; I see no evidence that the new template covers any aspects of his personal life; it also has serious problems with synthesis; on what basis, for instance, were the events and people listed here chosen? Those lists are neither comprehensive nor systematic. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:54, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 25. (non-admin closure) –Piranha249 15:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Off_wiki_Covid_19}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).