Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 19#Template:Cfb division III

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Championship clubs map 2010}}

Unused map of rugby teams. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Only plausible use is in 2010 RFL Championship. Article like 2018 RFL Championship have maps but use a different style, Nigej (talk) 20:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Cfb division III}}

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 20:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Dutch business and financial innovations}}
• {{Tfd links|Dutch constellations}}
• {{Tfd links|Early modern Netherlandish cartography, geography and cosmography}}

These three templates were created by the now-blocked users Zingvin and DUYX (for sockpuppetry), who were noted for their nationalistic edits. "Dutch business and financial innovations": I've never seen another "pioneering innovations" template and it seems quite WP:OR to me. "Dutch constellations": also includes Flemish persons and is again WP:OR. "Early modern Netherlandish cartography, geography and cosmography": just look at the size of that thing, and again WP:OR. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 21:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete All feel very much like OR and Synth. I'm not seeing the benefit in what these templates are supposed to provide but delete. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete - I don't know if it's allowed to vote on your own tfd nomination but the banned user has been trying to revert the tfd process while using an IP address [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Dutch_constellations&diff=1061363756&oldid=1061133869 see e.g. this]. Combined with the fact these templates are full of OR and Synth, it gives me the feeling these should be deleted. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 08:09, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete first two, weak keep on the cartography one as Early modern Netherlandish cartography is a topic. Though even the third template is too big. It should be trimmed. --Sankari (talk) 12:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete all as WP:OR. If someone wants to create something more targeted for Early modern Netherlandish cartography, then go ahead, but this one is clearly too broad. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Taiwan politics/party colours/Democratic Progressive Party}}
• {{Tfd links|Taiwan politics/party colours/New Power Party}}
• {{Tfd links|Taiwan politics/party colours/Taiwan Statebuilding Party}}

Recently created templates that shouldn't be created anymore. Please see Module:Political party. Gonnym (talk) 20:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Green politics/Core Topics}}
• {{Tfd links|Green politics/Four Pillars}}
• {{Tfd links|Green politics/Organizations}}
• {{Tfd links|Green politics/Related Topics}}
• {{Tfd links|Green politics/Schools}}

Unused sub-pages of {{tl|Green politics}}. Gonnym (talk) 20:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

:{{reply to|Gonnym}} These templates seem to be obsolete now. Jarble (talk) 23:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|AFL2016ladderprogression}}
• {{Tfd links|AFL All}}
• {{Tfd links|AFL SA}}
• {{Tfd links|AFL Vic}}
• {{Tfd links|AFL WA}}

All unused. The ladder progression should be substituted on the 2016 AFL season article since it contains relevant article content to the overall subject. The rest are just links to teams in the league. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete all. 2016 AFL season#Ladder progression has the ladder progression already. Others unused. Nigej (talk) 20:26, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Party index link. ✗plicit 00:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Party name with color box|module=|type=merge}}
• {{Tfd links|Party index link|module=|type=merge}}

Propose merging Template:Party name with color box with Template:Party index link.

Both templates produce almost the exact same output:

• {{t|Party name with color box|Progressistas|PP}}
• {{Party index link|Progressistas}}

Aside from the slight size and border difference, {{tl|Party name with color box}} offers also {{para|2}} to use a different label name. Gonnym (talk) 16:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Comment {{tl|Party index link}} also has a {{para|border}} to change the border, which is not documented in {{tl|Party name with color box}}; So there'd be {{para|1}}, {{para|2}}, and {{para|border}} in the merged version, which should all be documented -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 23:40, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
• :Both have {{para|border}}. Gonnym (talk) 23:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

::: Yes, it is undocumented in Party name with color box, as I stated. It should be documented when the new documentation is written -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 20:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Merge to {{tl|Party index link}}, which is more widely used. I have added the {{para|2}} option. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Maurice Hatton}}

Generally, navboxes should contain a minimum of five links. This navbox consists of two, only one of which is a film, leaving nothing to navigate. ✗plicit 12:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomiantion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 20:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Scottish politics/party colours/Scottish Conservatives}}
• {{Tfd links|Scottish politics/party colours/Scottish Greens}}
• {{Tfd links|Scottish politics/party colours/Scottish Labour}}
• {{Tfd links|Scottish politics/party colours/Scottish Liberal Democrats}}
• {{Tfd links|Scottish politics/party colours/Scottish National Party}}

Unused Scottish political party color templates. Gonnym (talk) 09:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomiantion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Separtycol-jl}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtycol-nyd}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-c}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-fp}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-fpp}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-i}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-j}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-kd}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-lbp}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-lcp}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-lip}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-lp}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-m}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-np}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-pmp}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtylcol-s}}
• {{Tfd links|Swedish political parties shading key}}
• {{Tfd links|Separtycol-doc}}

Unused Swedish political party color templates. Gonnym (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomiantion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/AfD}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/CDU}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/CSU}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/Die Tierschutzpartei}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/FDP}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/BP}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/DP}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/DZP}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/KPD}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/SPD}}
• {{Tfd links|German Workers' Party}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/Green}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/Left}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/MLDP}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/NPD}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/PDS}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/PIRATEN}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/REP}}
• {{Tfd links|German politics/party colours/SSW}}

Unused German political party color templates. Gonnym (talk) 08:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomiantion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Moldovan politics/party colours/AMN}}
• {{Tfd links|Moldovan politics/party colours/PCRM}}
• {{Tfd links|Moldovan politics/party colours/PDM}}
• {{Tfd links|Moldovan politics/party colours/PL}}
• {{Tfd links|Moldovan politics/party colours/PLDM}}
• {{Tfd links|Moldovan politics/party colours/PNL}}
• {{Tfd links|Moldovan politics/party colours/PPCD}}
• {{Tfd links|Moldovan politics/party colours/PSD}}

Unused Moldovan political party color templates. Gonnym (talk) 07:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomiantion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Regional Mexican Radio in Wyoming}}

A broken template redundant to {{tl|Spanish Radio Stations in Wyoming}} which itself has just three entries. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomiantion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete - none of the articles in the navbox appear to be airing a Regional Mexican format anymore.--Tdl1060 (talk) 04:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: {{tq|There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template|q=yes}} Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Unused. Nigej (talk) 10:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|ESPN Iowa}}

Of the five stations, one is news/talk with sports, one is Regional Mexican (KAYL), and the other three are also in {{tl|Sports Radio Stations in Iowa}}. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomiantion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Tdl1060 (talk) 03:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: {{tq|There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template|q=yes}} Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 10:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|ESPN Alaska}}

Redundant to {{tl|Sports Radio Stations in Alaska}}, itself a fairly small navbox. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomiantion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Tdl1060 (talk) 03:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: {{tq|There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template|q=yes}} Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. List of ESPN Radio affiliates has a list of the stations by state. This one, and the other 50 or so ESPN ones could all be deleted, as they seem superfluous to the {{tl|Sports Radio Stations in Alaska}} series. They don't seem to provide much extra in the way of navigation, they just clutter up the bottom of articles like KTZN with a confusing array of multi-colored banners . Nigej (talk) 10:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).