Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 20#Template:Legacy Broadcasting

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rishtey (TV series)}}

This navigational template is for a reality television series and consists of four links: the series and three season articles, but the three season articles have been merged with the the series for seven years, so the navigational template is used only once and navigates nowhere. Aspects (talk) 23:50, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Completely useless. Nigej (talk) 16:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Timeline Bar}}
• {{Tfd links|Timeline Bars}}
• {{Tfd links|Timeline note}}
• {{Tfd links|Timeline Notes}}
• {{Tfd links|Draw Bar}}
• {{Tfd links|Scalemarkers}}

Template:Graphical timeline has been converted to lua in May and these template components of it are unused and unneeded anymore. Gonnym (talk) 22:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Transwiki to Templates.Wikia and if there is some other MediaWiki template coding repository, along with the old version of {{tl|graphical timeline}} ; and to Wikiversity as a how-to-code MediaWiki Templates subject -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 02:14, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Vacant/block}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Progressive/block}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Liberty/active}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Know Nothing/block}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/ICM Party (Virgin Islands)}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/ICM}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Green/block}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Conservative (New York)/block}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/American Delta}}

US political party shading templates that no longer have any transclusions after migrations to {{tl|Political party}}. No transclusions or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. -- Emperork 🐋🐰 05:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Churu weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Clones weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Damoh weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Aungpan Monthly Climate Averages}}
• {{Tfd links|Casement weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Châlons-en-Champagne weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Darjeeling weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Derbent weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Dijon weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Dublin Airport weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Enshi weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Fair Isle weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Folkestone weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Glen Ogle weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Hereford weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Karachi weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Kilkenny weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Krasnojarsk weatherbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Kyzyl weatherbox}}

unused duplicate of Churu, Rajasthan#Climate, Clones, County Monaghan#Climate, Damoh#Climate, ... Frietjes (talk) 22:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, as unused duplicates. Nigej (talk) 16:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rubio16}}

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Only edit was creation in 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete A coloured box in some way related to Marco Rubio 2016 presidential campaign but seemingly never used. Nigej (talk) 16:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. -- Emperork 🐋🐰 05:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Th-rail-color}}
• {{Tfd links|TER Picardie style}}
• {{Tfd links|TER Midi-Pyrénées style}}
• {{Tfd links|TER Limousin style}}
• {{Tfd links|TER Aquitaine style}}
• {{Tfd links|STPETERSBURGMETRO style}}
• {{Tfd links|Peshawar BRT style}}
• {{Tfd links|Pakrail style}}
• {{Tfd links|I2 style}}
• {{Tfd links|Glasgow Subway style}}
• {{Tfd links|Glasgow Subway colour}}
• {{Tfd links|DB style}}
• {{Tfd links|StPetersburg Metro style}}
• {{Tfd links|MCS style}}

No transclusions. These templates appear to have been replaced and orphaned as part of the migration to {{tl|Adjacent stations}}. If one or more of these templates has been nominated in error because its name is similar to the train color/lines/stations/style templates, I will be happy to remove it from this nomination. If any of these templates were created with the intention of using them but editors haven't gotten around to it yet, {{tl|Adjacent stations}} should be used instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:Most were created pre-AS, so I presume this is just housekeeping at this point. Simple delete. Mitch32^{(sail away with me to another world.)} 22:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

::*Delete As their creator, since {{tl|Adjacent stations}} is better. JackPotte (talk) 07:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:59, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Sri Lanka Institute of Nanotechnology}}

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. The navbox contains only one link to a possibly associated person, and that person's article contains an unsourced claim of affiliation with this organization. There is not enough content here to support a navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete as unused. The parent article exists but doesn't use the template. Nigej (talk) 16:07, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Warner Bros. Discovery}}

No transclusions. Duplicate of {{tl|AT&T}}. Would be speedy T3, but that was made obsolete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rutgers Biomedical}}

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Appears to be better served by {{tl|Rutgers University}}, which is used in the articles listed in this navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by {{admin|Shirt58}} AnomieBOT⚡ 12:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Time between}}

No transclusions. Appears to do math incorrectly, assuming that all months are 30 days long. Appears to duplicate (poorly) the functionality of {{tl|Days since}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:53, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete More like {{tl|Age in days}} I think but, as noted, gets the wrong answer. And it also misses leap years. Nigej (talk) 16:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|S-line/UP left/main}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line right/Choctaw Rocket}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/Tucumcari-Rock Island}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/Choctaw Rocket}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NYCS left/Second}}

Unused S-line templates with over one year since the most recent edit. Nominating for deletion per this discussion; articles using S-line templates are being migrated to use :Template:Adjacent stations. Also see this recent related TFD, from October 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:49, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Photosensitivity warning}}

No transclusions. Appears to violate Wikipedia:No disclaimers. If this template is useful in an article, it should be applied to that article, and a discussion can be had there about whether the disclaimer, or the potentially harmful content, should be present in the article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Comment this disclaimer doesn't seem to fit the No disclaimers type disclaimers, since it isn't about editorial content per se. Though it does fit under potential legal consequence no disclaimer -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 02:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Comment Pokemon seizures should probably have this warning if it were to be implemented. As hundreds of children ended up in hospital with photosensitive epileptic seizures from the original incident. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 17:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. Around 3% of people with epilepsy are photosensitive. [https://epilepsysociety.org.uk/about-epilepsy/epileptic-seizures/seizure-triggers/photosensitive-epilepsy], translating to ~100k people in the United States. In comparison, around 9 million people in the US have PTSD [https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/post-traumatic-stress-disorder-ptsd] (3,000x as many). And yet, we do not have such disclaimers for PTSD triggers. A similar argument could be made for phobias, gore, etc. But we do not have disclaimers for these things, because we are an encyclopedia. We present the information in a matter of fact way, without any editorialization. If we have such disclaimers for things like this, the number of disclaimers necessary becomes quite large and unwieldy. I do not think it improves the state of the project. At the same time, we probably should not have lots and lots of flashing gifs, as these are also unencyclopedic. — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 17:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per the WP:No disclaimers guideline. Crossroads ^-talk- 23:51, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
• Keep. I disagree with the notion that having this template is a violation of WP:DISCLAIM. From my understanding of that policy, it deals with warnings about the validity and/or vulgarity of written content in articles which can be edited at any time. The policy's page points out that such disclaimers on specific articles are unnecessary because the general disclaimer can already be found on every page. However, I think that there is a major difference between potentially misleading/offensive content and videos which could trigger negative physical effects in people with epilepsy. Having specific disclaimers about the latter is not something that I can say I am against when I do not see it as the same type of disclaimer which the disclaimer policy speaks against. And while it is true that this template is not currently used anywhere, there are definitely some articles in which it could be used; one example off the top of my head is Dennō Senshi Porygon, which has a video in its infobox that this template would apply to. Overall, I do not see the existence and/or usage of this template as something which does more harm than good, nor do I agree that it goes against any policies, so I cannot support deleting it. --Zander251 (talk) 03:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Oldies Radio Stations in North Dakota}}

Empty navbox with no transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: {{tq|There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template|q=yes}} Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Nigej (talk) 18:55, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Modern Rock Radio Stations in Montana}}

No transclusions. Links to only two articles, each of which uses more complete navboxes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: {{tq|There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template|q=yes}} Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Overly specific: surely there'll never be an article Modern Rock Radio Stations in Montana. Nigej (talk) 18:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Modern Rock Radio Stations in Mississippi}}

Empty navbox with no transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: {{tq|There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template|q=yes}} Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Overly specific. Nigej (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Arkansas}}

No transclusions. Contains a link to only one article, which uses three more complete navboxes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: {{tq|There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template|q=yes}} Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Overly specific. Nigej (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Daytime-only radio stations in Vermont}}

No transclusions. Contains a link to only one article, which uses two more complete navboxes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: {{tq|There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template|q=yes}} Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Overly specific. Nigej (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Contemporary Hit Radio Stations in Delaware}}

No transclusions. Links to only one page, which uses the better navbox at {{tl|Wilmington DE Radio}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: {{tq|There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template|q=yes}} Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Overly specific. Nigej (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Maryland}}

No transclusions. Appears to be better covered by {{tl|Contemporary Hit Radio Stations in Maryland}}, which has all or nearly all of the links in this template. Merge with that template, or delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: {{tq|There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template|q=yes}} Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Overly specific. Nigej (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Sinhalese people}}

No transclusions, no documentation. Last substantive edit was in 2010. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete as unused. Sidebar about Sinhalese people but not used there. Nigej (talk) 19:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|2010 West Coast Eagles squad}}

A single-use roster template. Should be substituted on the 2010 West Coast Eagles season article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Subst and delete per nom. Single use and no other plausible uses. Nigej (talk) 19:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|SIMI}}

Fails WP:OR. This is a completely made up template cobbled together with unrelated names added here without any basis. None of these names added in the template find a mention in the main article Students' Islamic Movement of India. The template had been blanked in past which I believe was an attempt for deletion. Usage on some articles also violates WP:BLP Venkat TL (talk) 15:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Nigej (talk) 19:53, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Party shading/People's Action Party}}

Unused Singapore political party shading template. Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --Emperork 🐋🐰 05:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Nowoczesna}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/PiS}}
• {{Tfd links|United People's Party/meta/shading}}

Unused Poland political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 13:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --Emperork 🐋🐰 05:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Lakas-Christian Muslim Democrats}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/BOPK/block}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Partido Barug/block}}

Unused Philippines political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 13:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --Emperork 🐋🐰 05:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Brazilian Social Democracy Party}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Communist Party of Brazil}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Green Party (Brazil)}}
• {{Tfd links|Party shading/Social Christian Party (Brazil)}}

Unused Brazilian political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 13:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --Emperork 🐋🐰 05:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Party shading/New Progressive Party (Puerto Rico)/color}}

Unused Puerto Rico color template. Gonnym (talk) 13:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --Emperork 🐋🐰 05:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Colored box wd}}

Unused template without documentation and no incoming links. Gonnym (talk) 13:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Colorts}}

Unused fork of Template:Colort (which is used on articles such as List of colors: A–F). Gonnym (talk) 13:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Color wheel comparison}}

Unused color wheel table. Only place that could fit is Color wheel. If consensus is to add it to that article then it should be subst and deleted. I however personally think the color styling on this table doesn't look good so I'm not proposing adding it. Gonnym (talk) 12:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete I don't see substitution as a solution because it doesn't fit the Color wheel article. Very little relevance in my view. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 12. Sandstein 13:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Dates_for_Easter}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:47, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Legacy Broadcasting}}

Most stations have been resold within the last couple of years. And with one station left in the group, there's no need for this template. Csworldwide1 (talk) 08:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

:*Keep I added a former section, so I think it still has value. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Fails NEAN. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

:*{{yo|WikiCleanerMan}} trying to learn here: what is NEAN? Thanks in advance, UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

:::Wikipedia:Not everything needs a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 08:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Difficult to see that it's really any use as an aid for navigation, given the other content. Nigej (talk) 20:05, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Should users decide to implement this for use in {{tl|Smallcaps all}}, please feel to contact me for restoration. ✗plicit 11:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Smallcaps all/styles.css}}

Oh, well, this template is not used. Q28 (talk) 06:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

::I've created, validated and proposed {{tl|Smallcaps all}} to use this TemplateStyle page, but no one willing to do. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 06:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:::@Great Brightstar could you explain the issue? Pinging also @Izno to this. Gonnym (talk) 13:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

::::Well, I just got new implementation based on TemplateStyles, and followed discussions at its talk page, however no one have interest to apply in the end. --Great Brightstar (talk) 17:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Fmbox/styles.css}}

Oh, this is not used. Q28 (talk) 06:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:Delete per cmbox, ombox, imbox, and tmbox. Module:Message box/styles.css and Template:Ambox/styles.css should probably also be deleted for the same reason. Gonnym (talk) 14:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Na/bgcolor}}
• {{Tfd links|Active/bgcolor}}
• {{Tfd links|Okay/bgcolor}}
• {{Tfd links|Discography list/bgcolor}}
• {{Tfd links|Partial/bgcolor}}
• {{Tfd links|Partial failure/bgcolor}}
• {{Tfd links|Coming soon/bgcolor}}
• {{Tfd links|Success/bgcolor}}
• {{Tfd links|Maybe/bgcolor}}
• {{Tfd links|Site active/bgcolor}}
• {{Tfd links|Site inactive/bgcolor}}
• {{Tfd links|Safe/bgcolor}}

The template is not used`` Q28 (talk) 05:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:Delete. The idea behind this seems like a valid one, to allow legends to use the color used in these templates without these two values going out of sync. I'm voting delete however because two reasons. The first is that this system is just not being used, so keeping it is meaningless. The second is that the entire "Table cell" system in my opinion is poorly designed. They are all almost identical templates, with variations seem to be more accidental than by design. These would work much better as a single template and in turn extracting the color would not need duplicate templates. Gonnym (talk) 13:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|SIRT}}

This template is not used and ... Q28 (talk) 05:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|SOTD/2011-05-11}}

It is worth noting that this template is not used. Q28 (talk) 05:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

::I think that Wikipedia needs a Featured Sound project. This dates from the time Featured Sounds were about to get on the Main Page, but, despite widespread agreement to do so, the admins who said they'd sort it never did, and that... was project killing.

::...I don't even know anymore. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.5% of all FPs} 19:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Reşiţa Demographics}}

Is not used because the template is used only on one page and has been replaced. Q28 (talk) 05:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:It makes sense to keep only one template, and not both, I feel the one used on the page, just with the plotine is not as good as this one with the bars that we propose for deletion. On this one with the bars you can clearly see the numbers of each year. The one with the plotline makes sense when you have 30-100 entries. Anyway, I will let you choose, I am not that bothered. TudorTulok (talk) 15:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:*Delete per nom. Should be substed into an article if it's any use. Nigej (talk) 20:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|RSR}}

Not used since template was created. Q28 (talk) 05:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Comment what tool did you use to see if it has never been used? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 20:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 27. ✗plicit 11:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|IntFixCal}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. This can be undeleted if someone finds a use for it. From the history, it looks like it may have been created for {{tl|Navseasoncats}} which now uses LUA. If anyone needs to recreate it, the content was {{#expr:((({{#time:Y}}/10)-1.5) round 0)}}0 which returns the numeric value of the previous decade without the trailing "s". Similar, templates included {{tl|NEXTDECADE}} (now deleted) and {{tl|CURRENTDECADE}} (which has almost the exact same code). Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:51, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|LASTDECADE}}

We don't have a need for this right now and can be recreated, but other templates currently can replace their functions. Q28 (talk) 05:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Keep/out of process — I made this template out of necessity, and used it somewhere. Someone has removed its use prior to TfD'ing, and I don't have the time to remember/figure out where it was.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  11:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

:* And I suspect this situation is similar to the other LAST-X TfDs, as it seems very suspicious that all of a sudden none of them are in use.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  11:26, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

::: Some others were nominated on WP:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 18 -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 18:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|LASTWEEKDAYABBREV}}

The template is corrupt and cannot be used for any purpose. Q28 (talk) 05:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Unused. Not sure what the nominator means the template is corrupt. Doesn't look like the template is malformed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Comment I've fixed the incorrect template coding {{#time:D|-1 day}}

( {{#time:D|-1 day}} ) ; though the template has been unused since creation because the code was broken -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 18:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WikiProject The Beatles/hide}}

Is no longer in use. This should be the last unused /hide template. Q28 (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Infobox space program. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Infobox space programme|module=|type=merge}}
• {{Tfd links|Infobox space program|module=|type=merge}}

Propose merging Template:Infobox space programme with Template:Infobox space program.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ComparePages?page1=Template%3AInfobox+space+program&rev1=&page2=Template%3AInfobox+space+programme&rev2 The only meaningful difference] between these two infoboxes is the different spelling of "program/programme" in the "Program history" subheader. Couldn't the implimentation of different spellings be way, way, way more efficently achieved by simply implimenting a switch of some kind in the space program infobox instead? Something like... Progra{{#if:{{{programme|}}}|mme|m}} history? — Molly Brown (talk) 05:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Merge per nomination. -2pou (talk) 17:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Merge per nomination. -- Emperork 🐋🐰 05:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).