Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 29

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Delaware's largest cities}}

unused, duplicates table in article Frietjes (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Duplicate as noted in nomination. Superman7515 (talk) 21:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Electricity delivery. Izno (talk) 22:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Electrical power distribution}}

Unused: no transclusions or incoming links. Appears to have been replaced by {{tl|Electricity delivery}}. A bold redirect to that template might not be out of line, as this template has a reasonable name. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Redirect to Template:Electricity delivery. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Agree, Template:Electricity delivery is well used by the relevant articles. Electrical power distribution is included as a section in that. Dougsim (talk)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|S-line/CPTM right/Line 13-Airport Connect}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/Keio left/Inokashira}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/Keio left/Keio Liner}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/Keio left/Sagamihara}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/Keio right/Inokashira}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/Keio right/Keio Liner}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/Keio right/Sagamihara}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/MOSMETRO left/8A}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/MTS left/Blue}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/MTS left/Green}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/MTS left/Orange}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/MTS left/Silver}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/MTS right/Blue}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/MTS right/Green}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/MTS right/Orange}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/MTS right/Silver}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT left/11}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT left/11N}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT left/12}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT left/12N}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT left/13}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT left/17}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT left/18}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT left/19}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT right/11}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT right/11N}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT right/12}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT right/12N}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT right/13}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT right/17}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT right/18}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/OT right/19}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT left/Bua Yai}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT left/Kantang Branch Line}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT left/Khiri Rat Nikhom}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT left/Phra Phutthachai}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT left/Thammarat}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT right/Bua Yai}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT right/Kantang Branch Line}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT right/Khiri Rat Nikhom}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT right/Laem Chabang}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT right/Mae Nam}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT right/Map Ta Phut}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/SRT right/Thammarat}}
• {{tfd links|S-line/Tama Toshi Monorail right/Tama Toshi Monorail}}

Unused S-line templates with over one year since the most recent edit. Nominating for deletion per this discussion; articles using S-line templates are being migrated to use :Template:Adjacent stations. Also see the most recent related TFD, from October 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Comment: I have notified all of the creators of these templates, but I have not tagged the templates individually with TFD notices. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Andorra}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Angola}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Armenia}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Asturias}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Bagmati Province}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Belarus}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Belgium}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Belize}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Benin}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Bhutan}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Botswana}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Burkina Faso}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Burundi}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities in Eastern South Asia}}
• {{Tfd links|Largest cities of Paraguay}}
• {{Tfd links|Georgia's largest cities}}

These are all single-use tables which could be easily merged with the parent article. There is no need to keep the table outside of the article when it could be included in the article directly. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:16, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• substitute and delete, single-use tables. Frietjes (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Comment if {{tl|Georgia's largest cities}} is kept, it needs to be renamed, since Georgia is highly ambiguous. {{tl|Georgia (U.S. state) largest cities}} should be used instead or some variant thereof. -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 16:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
• Comment. If there is consensus to substitute those templates, then per WP:Subst and delete it may be preferable to keep the templates' histories, like with any other merge. – Uanfala (talk) 22:38, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac (talk) 11:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Baltic Fleet Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Baltic Fleet Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Bessarabia Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Bessarabia Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Black Sea Fleet Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Black Sea Fleet Electoral District vote, 1917}}

The Baltic Fleet templates can be deleted as the respective article already has the same information in table format. The rest should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:58, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

• See Comment at Altai TFD below. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 8. Primefac (talk) 12:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Republic_of_China_presidential_elections}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac (talk) 11:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Minsk Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Minsk Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Mogilev Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Mogilev Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Moscow City Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Moscow City Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Moscow Province Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Moscow Province Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Nizhni Novgorod Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Nizhni Novgorod Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Northern Front Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Northern Front Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Novgorod Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Novgorod Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Olonets Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Olonets Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Orel Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Orel Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Orenburg Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Orenburg Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Yakutsk Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Yakutsk Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Yaroslavl Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Yaroslavl Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Yenisei Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Yenisei Electoral District vote, 1917}}

All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

• See Comment at Altai TFD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac (talk) 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Don Cossack Region Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Don Cossack Region Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Ekaterinoslav Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Ekaterinoslav Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Estonia Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Estonia Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Fergana Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Fergana Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Horde Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Irkutsk Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Irkutsk Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Livonia Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Livonia Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Riazan Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Riazan Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Romanian Front Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Romanian Front Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Ufa Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Ufa Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Uralsk Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Uralsk Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Western Front Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Western Front Electoral District vote, 1917}}

All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

• See Comment at Altai TFD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac (talk) 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Viatka Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Viatka Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Vitebsk Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Vitebsk Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Vladimir Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Vladimir Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Volhynia Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Vologda Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Vologda Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Voronezh Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Voronezh Electoral District vote, 1917}}

All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

• See Comment at Altai TFD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac (talk) 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Penza Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Penza Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Perm Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Perm Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Petrograd City Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Petrograd City Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Petrograd Province Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Petrograd Province Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Podolia Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Podolia Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Poltava Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Poltava Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Pskov Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Pskov Electoral District vote, 1917}}

All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

• See Comment at Altai TFD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac (talk) 11:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Tambov Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Tambov Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Taurida Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Taurida Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Terek-Dagestan Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Tobolsk Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Tobolsk Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Tomsk Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Tomsk Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Transbaikal Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Transbaikal Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Transcaucasus Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Transcaucasus Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Transcaucasus Electoral District vote, 1917 (Spirin)}}
• {{Tfd links|Tula Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Tula Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Turgai Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Turgai Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Tver Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Tver Electoral District vote, 1917}}

The Turgai Electoral District vote, 1917 template should be substituted onto its respective election article as it's single-use. The rest should be substituted on such articles and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

• See Comment at Altai TFD below. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac (talk) 11:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Samara Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Samara Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Samarkand Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Samarkand Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Saratov Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Saratov Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Semirechie Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Semirechie Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Simbirsk Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Simbirsk Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Smolensk Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Smolensk Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|South-Western Front Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|South-Western Front Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Stavropol Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Stavropol Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Steppe (Semipalatinsk) Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Steppe Electoral District vote, 1917}}

Only two are used on the respective election articles and should be substituted on there. The rest should be substituted on such articles and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

• See Comment at Altai TFD below. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Kaluga Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kaluga Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kamchatka Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kazan Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kazan Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kharkov Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kharkov Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kherson Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kherson Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kiev Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kiev Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kostroma Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kostroma Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kursk Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Kursk Electoral District vote, 1917}}

Only used on two articles and should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

• See Comment at Altai TFD below. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Keep all per comments at the Altai TfD. This would make the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election article worse without an actual benefit. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. While there was no participation at this particular discussion, those of similar templates above and below (Kaluga and Altai) have very similar nomination rationales and a consensus to keep. Primefac (talk) 11:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Caucasian Front Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Caucasian Front Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Chernigov Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Chernigov Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Chinese Eastern Railroad Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Chinese Eastern Railroad Electoral District vote, 1917}}

The Caspian template can be deleted as it doesn't contain enough information. The rest should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:11, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

• See Comment at Altai TFD below. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Altai Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Altai Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Amur-Maritime Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Amur-Maritime Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Archangel Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Arkhangelsk Electoral District vote, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Astrakhan Electoral District deputies, 1917}}
• {{Tfd links|Astrakhan Electoral District vote, 1917}}

Only used on two articles and should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

• Comment: What is the technical basis for removing templates from the 1917 election article rather than substing? That article's specs look like this:

CPU time usage: 2.598 seconds
Real time usage: 3.034 seconds
Preprocessor visited node count: 15684/1000000
Post‐expand include size: 515313/2097152 bytes
Template argument size: 18879/2097152 bytes
Highest expansion depth: 9/40
Expensive parser function count: 1/500
Unstrip recursion depth: 1/20
Unstrip post‐expand size: 358878/5000000 bytes
Lua time usage: 0.766/10.000 seconds
Lua memory usage: 6344031/52428800 bytes

:I don't see anything "extremely long" about that. If the template does not need to be removed from that article, then Keep is probably reasonable, since the content is used in two places. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

::I was implying that it may have been an issue, but substitution is still the preferred option, but in my view, it's better on the respective results articles for the regions. It's the more relevant space. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

::I'd prefer Keep - the templates are used in both the national summary and individual articles on constituencies. --Soman (talk) 00:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

:::Election results tables should be treated as being article content and thus should be part of the article mainspace. Not on a separate space. The transclusions, in this case, have very little relevance since it's not about it being single-use or being in multiple spaces. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Keep all these are used in multiple places so there's a benefit to keeping the data centralized instead of substituted into multiple articles. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Election box runningmate begin popular vote only}}
• {{Tfd links|Election box runningmate begin seats}}
• {{Tfd links|Election box runningmate candidate}}
• {{Tfd links|Election box runningmate candidate popular vote only}}
• {{Tfd links|Election box runningmate candidate seats}}
• {{Tfd links|Election box runningmate majority begin popular vote only}}
• {{Tfd links|Election box runningmate majority begin seats}}
• {{Tfd links|Election box runningmate majority candidate}}
• {{Tfd links|Election box runningmate majority candidate popular vote only}}
• {{Tfd links|Election box runningmate majority candidate seats}}

The above group are all unused table election templates created by Piyyas almost a year and half ago. Gonnym (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

: Even know it has been a while since I checked on them, but I don't know why no one wants to use these templates, which they were created as extensions of the two original templates: Template:Election box runningmate begin and Template:Election box runningmate majority begin. Piyyas (talk) 16:22, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

::I have no idea why these aren't used, but I'm assuming there must be other templates that do the same things. There were many other election table templates also unused. Some already deleted, others will be at TfD later on. Gonnym (talk) 06:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete all per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:19, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|UCUM units}}
• {{Tfd links|UCUM other units}}
• {{Tfd links|UCUM base quantities}}
• {{Tfd links|UCUM base quantities/table}}
• {{Tfd links|UCUM electromagnetism units}}
• {{Tfd links|UCUM light units}}
• {{Tfd links|UCUM radiometry units}}

Per the deletion discussion for gram per cubic metre, this isn't a useful template. UCUM is a standard for exchanging information about units between computer systems, not a system of units itself. The fact that it can include essentially ANY unit means that having a template for the units it can exchange is meaningless. All of these templates are unused, and that is unlikely to change. PianoDan (talk) 19:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:{{u|PianoDan}} Please do not list the same template twice. I have removed the repeated entry. Neel.arunabh (talk) 19:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

::Whoops. Thanks for the fix! PianoDan (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete all except Template:UCUM base quantities and Template:UCUM base quantities/table. And Template:UCUM electromagnetism units should also not be deleted. Let me hear from {{u|Srleffler}}. I can see {{u|Srleffler}}'s comment at Template talk:UCUM units saying {{tq|I question the value of this template. There is no such thing as a "UCUM unit". UCUM is a coding system, meant to allow the representation of all units. It is not a system of units analogous to SI.}}. Likewise, {{u|Srleffler}} posted similar comments in the talk pages of other templates also. But he/she did not post at Template talk:UCUM base quantities and Template talk:UCUM base quantities/table, but he/she did make some edits at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:UCUM_base_quantities&action=history Template:UCUM base quantities] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AUCUM_base_quantities%2Ftable&type=revision&diff=895875872&oldid=894800112 Template:UCUM base quantities/table], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:UCUM_base_quantities/table&diff=next&oldid=895875872 Template:UCUM base quantities/table]. {{u|Srleffler}} has not said anything about Template:UCUM electromagnetism units. Neel.arunabh (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:*Comment these templates aren't notable or not based on the comments of one particular editor. I can't see any reason why some fraction of these should be kept. Either they all should, or none of them. PianoDan (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete all Unused, and they'd only clutter up any page on which they were used. XOR'easter (talk) 23:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. Not useful, since UCUM is not a system of measurement. UCUM does have base units, but there is not really any reason why these should be listed outside the UCUM article itself. I haven't seen any evidence that base quantitites are relevant in UCUM, and doubt that we need a template for them. These templates were part of a larger effort to present UCUM as an analogue to SI. I've argued elsewhere that this was a bad idea.--Srleffler (talk) 06:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Unblock new}}

Unused. {{tq|is in the early stages of development}} since 2018 with no sign of progress. See also #Template:Unblock new/1 below. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Halinga Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Helme Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Juuru Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Kaiu Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Käru Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Karula Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Lääne-Saare Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Laekvere Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Laeva Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Laimjala Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Mõniste Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Orissaare Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Õru Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Rägavere Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Salme Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Sauga Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Sõmerpalu Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Taheva Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Tarvastu Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Vara Parish}}
• {{Tfd links|Vastseliina Parish}}

Unused navigation templates for parishes that no longer exist after administrative reform of 2017. See [https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/131052017006 this link] (in Estonian) for details related to at least some of the parishes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom.--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by {{admin|MSGJ}} AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Ambox/template}}

No incoming links, no transclusions. Appears to be an abandoned experiment from 2012. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Comment: Template creator has marked it as speedy G7, and the template has been deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 8. Primefac (talk) 11:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Cleanup_list_sort}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Rugby league squad start but preserve rls as a redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rls|module=|type=merge}}
• {{tfd links|Rls start|module=|type=merge}}
• {{Tfd links|Rugby league squad start|module=|type=merge}}

Propose merging Template:Rls with Template:Rugby league squad start.

These three templates are various versions of the same template and should be merged together and/or redirected to {{t|Rugby league squad start}} to avoid confusion and decentralised formatting. Note that {{t|Rls start}} is pretty much unused and {{t|Rls}} is the primary template, so the choice to merge to {{t|rugby league squad start}} is mainly so that the final name is the most clear version (i.e. I expect everything to be merged to {{t|rls}} and then that template gets moved). Primefac (talk) 13:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Merge – Seems fairly cut and dry for a merge here, but I do disagree with the idea of making {{t|Rugby league squad start}} the primary end product. Although these templates were managed by the Rubgy League Wikiproject, it's worth noting that another primary user group for {{t|rls}} are the AFL Wikiproject, with AFL obviously being a different sport entirely. I'd say merge the other two into {{t|rls}}, then a decision can be made on a name which encompasses both sports at a later date if necessary. Empole1 (talk) 07:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
• Agree with this view – the articles where the {{t|rugby league squad start}} is being used, it would be appropriate that they should be transferred to the {{t|rls}} template. Storm machine (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
• :{{U|Primefac}}? Izno (talk) 05:02, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
• ::I disagree, as I have done for years, that we should default to using acronyms for templates where it's not immediately obvious. If AFL players are using {{t|rls}} (which does stand for "rugby league squad") then either the general name needs changing or the AFL players should stop using this. However, I have been out-voted in the past, and will simply pursue an RM at some point in the future for the entire rls family if the consensus here is to merge/redirect to {{t|rls}} for now. For the record, though, if the outcome of this discussion is "merge to {{t|rls}}" I see zero reason why the extant uses of the other two templates {{tq|should be transferred to the [new] template}}; they're still valid template names. Primefac (talk) 10:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
• Merge, but per Primefac's original plan. I agree about the naming question. Preserve the rls redirect of course. --Izno (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
• merge but keep {{tld|rls}} as a redirect. Frietjes (talk) 19:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Faces of Death}}

Redirected all films into main film article, no longer of use Dronebogus (talk) 12:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|ALPB color}}

Unused sport color template Gonnym (talk) 11:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|EU Railway stations}}

I'm not sure this template is particularly useful - all it seems to do is list one big station per EU member state using some unspecified criteria - is it supposed to be largest number of passengers? departures? something else? Either way, an uninformed reader who comes across this template might get the incorrect idea that Paris-Nord, Budapest-Keleti or Madrid-Atocha are the one and only "main station" in their respective cities which is very much misleading. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 10:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Main railway stations for a geopolitical entity can be left up to interpretation. No one would argue the railway stations featured on the template are not main stations in their respective nations, but it's best to have them featured on their respective country railway navboxes. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Comment It was inspired by the :Template:ASEAN Railway stations. We have three choices either a) Redesign the template, b) merge it with something else or c) delete it. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 17:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Izno (talk) 04:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Election summary Myanmar}}

Unused election table template. Gonnym (talk) 09:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Election summary begin two rounds}}

Unused election table template. Gonnym (talk) 09:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Election box total no swing}}

Unused election table template. Gonnym (talk) 09:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|List of nuclides (1h~1m)}}
• {{Tfd links|List of nuclides (1s~1ms)}}
• {{Tfd links|List of nuclides (1ms~)}}
• {{Tfd links|List of nuclides (1m~1s)}}

The above templates were started over 4 years ago by an editor that a month later stopped editing. They are all unused except in the creator's sandbox. Since they've haven't edited in over 4 years there is no point in moving this into their sandbox. Gonnym (talk) 09:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|NBL Canada statistical leaders}}

Unused template with a sea of red links and a few blue links. All blue links lead to two articles National Basketball League of Canada and List of NBL Canada statistical leaders by season, both of which appear in Template:National Basketball League of Canada Gonnym (talk) 08:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete All the blue links are redirects and unlikely the red links will be created into articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WikiProject Pennsylvania alerts}}

Is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• NOTE the associated project page that this template uses has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania/Alerts/content -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 17:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WikiProject Morocco/hide}}

This template is no longer in use today. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete /hide subpages are no longer supported after Special:Diff/328209909 * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WikiProject Open Access/to do}}

This template should now be deleted because it is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:00, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WikiProject Mauritius-ad}}

Completely unnecessary, this template is not used and should be removed. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

{{tlx|wikipedia ads|ad{{=}}240}}

{{tlx|WikiProject Mauritius-ad}}

• Comment this appears to have been replaced by the {{tl|wikipedia ads}} system, specifically {{tlx|wikipedia ads|ad{{=}}240}} -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 17:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WikiProject Connecticut/Example}}

Since the template is not used, I personally feel that it should be deleted. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Merge tp :Template:WikiProject Connecticut/testcases; this is clearly a test case -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 17:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WikiProject Computing/Categories}}

There is no need for this template to exist because it is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WikiProject Composers/Examples}}

It is not necessary because it is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Rename to :Template:WikiProject Composers/testcases, this is clearly the testcases page -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 17:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Visual edit}}

It is not used and useless. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:Not really used in English Wikipedia. In [https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%A0%CF%81%CF%8C%CF%84%CF%85%CF%80%CE%BF:%CE%A3%CF%85%CE%B3%CE%B3%CF%81%CE%B1%CF%86%CE%AE_%CE%BB%CE%AE%CE%BC%CE%BC%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%82 Greek Wikipedia] it serves as an icon on a help accordion.   ManosHacker ^talk 04:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

: Delete per nom. The purpose of the English Wikipedia is not to provide templates for other wikis to use. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Väätsa Parish}}

Not used because the template has been replaced by another template. -- Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Parish no longer exists. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Use she}}

Deleted because it is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Also note that this template populates dated "Use she pronouns from month year" categories, which don't exist. If this had ever been used, then someone would have done something about that REDNOT violation. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Use he}}

Could not be used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete as unused. Also note that this template populates dated "Use he pronouns from month year" categories, which don't exist. If this had ever been used, then someone would have done something about that REDNOT violation. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 6. Izno (talk) 22:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Unreferenced2}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|UNDtest}}

This template is unused and therefore needs to be deleted. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Abandoned test from 2014. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Unblock new/1}}
• {{Tfd links|Unblock new/2}}
• {{Tfd links|Unblock new/3}}

No one is using the template. Maybe we should delete it. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 03:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Admin note I have combined these three templates into one nomination, as they are in the same group. Primefac (talk) 13:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Keep It makes no sense to nominate the subtemplates for deletion separately. I've instead nominated the parent template for deletion, and when it is deleted the subtemplates can be G8ed. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Comment can this be closed and bundled into the {{tl|unblock new}} deletion request directly? -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 16:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).