Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 October 23#Template:Places in Bedfordshire/script

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:29, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Pisac}}

Of no use. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:29, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Hellenike}}

Unused, last edited in 2010, doesn't seem to have a clear purpose, creating editor is retired, and template code seems simple enough it could be replicated or replaced with plain text if required. I propose deletion. Identified as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates/Unused Templates Task Force. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Popular articles/hits}}

Not used, and lasted edited in 2008, this subtemplate makes a small formatting change to its parameter. I can't see a reason it should continue to exist. Identified as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates/Unused Templates Task Force. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:15, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Missilespecs-met}}

Not used, and last edited in 2008, this template has no purpose and is of a style inconsistent with our current formatting. I propose deletion. Identified as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates/Unused Templates Task Force. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Install Aircontent}}

Template for structuring 'related content', last edited 2007 and unused in article space (used once in talk space). Using these templates is nonstandard and what's more not user friendly or consistent with normal formatting. I propose deletion. Identified as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates/Unused Templates Task Force. Tom (LT) (talk) 06:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Listed as FLC}}

No one uses the template, and it seems that the template has been abandoned.. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 05:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Twwp}}

We don't need this template anymore, because other functions are already available. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 04:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Twwp-c}}

We don't need this template anymore, because other functions are already available. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 04:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Listed as FAC}}

No one uses the template, and it seems that the template has been abandoned Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 04:48, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. Unused and no documentation indicating how it ought to be used. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 19:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Notg4}}

It is {{unlikely}} that someone would use this template to warn a user. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 04:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Helpyou}}

Strangely, this template is not mentioned in the help process, so I think this template should be deleted. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 04:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Newsletterbot}}

The robot seems to have stopped working, so we don't need this template. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 04:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Listed as FAR}}

No one uses the template, and it seems that the template has been abandoned. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 04:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. Unused and no documentation indicating how it ought to be used. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 19:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|New RFCU request}}

Obviously, this template is no longer in use, so it is recommended to delete it. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 04:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WikiProject Phasmatodea/Categories}}

This unused project template, of an inactive project, last edited in 2007, duplicates functionality now provided as part of the overall WP template. I propose deletion Tom (LT) (talk) 03:15, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Places in Bedfordshire/script}}

Created and last edited (once) in 2006). doesn't seem to be a template at all. I propose deletion as this doesn't appear as a useful encyclopedic aid and seems to be a script intended for use once; an alternate option would be userification. Identified as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates/Unused Templates Task Force. Tom (LT) (talk) 03:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WP:CVU/IRC/Appr}}

unused and unedited since 2006. Seems to be a way to format a name in a table; unneeded now and function if ever required can simply be replaced with free text Tom (LT) (talk) 03:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).