Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:LanzhouM stations

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|QingdaoM color}}
• {{Tfd links|QingdaoM lines}}
• {{Tfd links|QingdaoM stations}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/QD left/1}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/QD left/2}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/QD left/3}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/QD left/8}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/QD left/11}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/QD right/1}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/QD right/2}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/QD right/3}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/QD right/8}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/QD right/11}}
• {{Tfd links|GuiyangM color}}
• {{Tfd links|GuiyangM stations}}
• {{Tfd links|HefeiM color}}
• {{Tfd links|HefeiM stations}}
• {{Tfd links|JinanM color}}
• {{Tfd links|JinanM stations}}
• {{Tfd links|LanzhouM color}}
• {{Tfd links|LanzhouM stations}}
• {{Tfd links|WenzhouM color}}
• {{Tfd links|WenzhouM stations}}

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Qingdao Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Guiyang Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Hefei Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Jinan Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Lanzhou Metro, and Module:Adjacent stations/Wenzhou Rail Transit. Gonnym (talk) 23:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete all per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Istanbul Metro stations}}
• {{Tfd links|Istanbul Metro lines}}
• {{Tfd links|Istanbul Metro color}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/F1}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/F3}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/F4}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M1A}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M1B}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M2}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M2 Seyrantepe}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M3}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M3 MetroKent}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M4}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M4 EXT}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M5}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M6}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M7}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M8}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M9}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M11}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro left/M12}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/F1}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/F3}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/F4}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M1A}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M1B}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M2}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M2 Seyrantepe}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M3}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M3 MetroKent}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M4}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M4 EXT}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M4 SG}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M5}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M6}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M7}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M8}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M9}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M11}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M12}}
• {{Tfd links|Istanbul Metro M1 M2 style}}
• {{Tfd links|Istanbul Metro M1 M3 style}}
• {{Tfd links|Istanbul Metro M2 F style}}
• {{Tfd links|Istanbul Metro M2 M6 style}}
• {{Tfd links|Istanbul Metro M2 M7 style}}
• {{Tfd links|Istanbul Metro M3 M7 style}}
• {{Tfd links|M1 style}}
• {{Tfd links|M2 style}}
• {{Tfd links|M3 style}}
• {{Tfd links|M4 style}}
• {{Tfd links|M5 style}}
• {{Tfd links|M6 style}}
• {{Tfd links|M7 style}}
• {{Tfd links|M11 style}}

Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Istanbul Metro. Frietjes (talk) 22:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. The style templates (Template:M1 style, etc.) still need to be replaced. Gonnym (talk) 23:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:: Added a few styles that were unused. --Gonnym (talk) 23:49, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:FHR}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:FHR}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:FHR}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|FHR}}

Unused flag template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Module:Ulam spiral}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Module:Ulam spiral}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Module:Ulam spiral}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request undeletion of these modules]. ✗plicit 23:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Ulam spiral|module=Module:}}
• {{Tfd links|Ulam spiral}}

Unused module which produces the Ulam spiral template, also unused, but has been known to have color contrast issues. Seems unlikely both of these would have any use anywhere unless this could be used on Ulam spiral. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL)}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL)}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL)}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL)}}

Broken template format that duplicates sources used on Semantic Web Services Language. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:CSLI Navy OR}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:CSLI Navy OR}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:CSLI Navy OR}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request undeletion of these templates]. ✗plicit 23:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|CSLI Navy OR}}
• {{Tfd links|CSLI rank insignia OR}}
• {{Tfd links|CSLI rank insignia OF}}
• {{Tfd links|CSLI Navy OF}}

Unused military rank/insignia templates. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 27. Izno (talk) 02:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Reference_values_for_the_HICP_and_interest_rate_convergence_criteria_(2013)}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:New Byzantium succession}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:New Byzantium succession}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:New Byzantium succession}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|New Byzantium succession}}

Unused family tree chart which may not be accurate. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:Same-sex marriage opinion polls sub-nations}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:Same-sex marriage opinion polls sub-nations}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:Same-sex marriage opinion polls sub-nations}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Same-sex marriage opinion polls sub-nations}}

Unused chart. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:List of snow-producing Atlantic tropical cyclones}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:List of snow-producing Atlantic tropical cyclones}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:List of snow-producing Atlantic tropical cyclones}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|List of snow-producing Atlantic tropical cyclones}}

Unused chart. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:PLAAF aircraft inventory}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:PLAAF aircraft inventory}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:PLAAF aircraft inventory}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|PLAAF aircraft inventory}}

Unused and not needed as the same list is featured on People's Liberation Army Air Force under the current inventory section. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:Major National and State parties TN}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:Major National and State parties TN}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:Major National and State parties TN}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Major National and State parties TN}}

Unused chart of political parties in Tamil Nadu, India. Maybe it can be substituted on List of political parties in Tamil Nadu. But the parties are presented in list format. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:Razr}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:Razr}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:Razr}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Razr}}

"Template to emphasize tex by letter-spacing". Does nothing but transclude itself. Only edit history has been it's creation and a minor edit following that by two minutes. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 25. ✗plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Lonoikahaupu,_Keawepoepoe,_Keeaumoku_Pāpaiahiahi,_Kamanawa_and_Kameʻeiamoku_family_tree}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WarningsTable}}

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. Created six months ago. OK to userfy if the creator wants to keep working on it. Creator's account is globally locked. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete reading the code, this is supposed to be used for warnings of flash flooding, a highly local issue, that seems to break WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTSOCIAL and WP:DISCLAIMERS -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:Edgar Lungu Cabinet 2016}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:Edgar Lungu Cabinet 2016}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:Edgar Lungu Cabinet 2016}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Edgar Lungu Cabinet 2016}}

Unused with no mainspace for use. Was being transcluded as a link in a navbox before removal. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:If wanted, this can be subst to 2016 Zambian general election. Gonnym (talk) 12:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Nbbt links}}

No transclusions or incoming links. Created in 2015, no substantive edits since then. It appears that this template has not been adopted anywhere. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:40, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:Comparison of Macintosh laptop models}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:Comparison of Macintosh laptop models}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:Comparison of Macintosh laptop models}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Comparison of Macintosh laptop models}}

Unused. Information related to this is already featured on Comparison of current Macintosh models. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Pakistan Armed Forces sidebar}}

This infobox has no transclusions, having apparently been incorporated into the only possible place for it, Pakistan Armed Forces, at some point. Not usable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 27. Izno (talk) 02:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Lang-may}}
• {{tfd links|Lang-mol}}
• {{tfd links|Lang-roa-leo}}
• {{tfd links|Lang-roa-nor}}
• {{tfd links|Lang-lom-ber}}
• {{tfd links|Lang-1bd}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Istanbul mass transit color}}
• {{Tfd links|Adjacent stations/Istanbul mass transit|module=y}}

No transclusions. Replaced with :Module:Adjacent stations/Istanbul Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
• delete (note that I corrected the replacement module name above). Frietjes (talk) 17:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Alihodzic}}

Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:Delete. Created by a user with 3 edits. Might even have been an incorrect attempt in using a citation. Gonnym (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:AMD Ryzen Mobile 3000 series}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#Template:AMD Ryzen Mobile 3000 series}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:AMD Ryzen Mobile 3000 series}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request undeletion of these templates]. ✗plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|AMD Ryzen Mobile 3000 series}}
• {{Tfd links|AMD Zen 2 based desktop APUs}}

Unused charts. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Benson-Convertibles}}

Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:Delete. Created 8 years ago and is unused. Gonnym (talk) 09:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Saltivska style}}
• {{Tfd links|Kholodnohirsko-Zavodska style}}

No transclusions. Pages using it have been updated to use :Module:Adjacent stations/Kharkiv Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Town and Cantonment wise map of Lahore}}

Unused map template. File image is already used on dozens of articles across Wikipedia including two other used templates. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:Delete. Template:Lahore City District is used instead. Gonnym (talk) 09:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Hong Kong Public Organizations}}

A giant mass of text with only four links to articles. Currently used on a draft submitted for review of the same name, Draft:Hong Kong Public Organizations. This does not aid in navigation. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:Delete. Wow. This isn't how a navbox should be used. Gonnym (talk) 09:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Shmee150 graphical timeline}}

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Shmee150 is a car youtuber -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 18:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Affleck-On Track}}

Unused citation template. The exact citation is used outside of template space on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=500&offset=0&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns100=1&ns101=1&ns118=1&ns119=1&ns710=1&ns711=1&ns828=1&ns829=1&ns2300=1&ns2301=1&ns2302=1&ns2303=1&search=Affleck%2C+Fred+%281978%29.+On+Track%3A+The+Making+of+Westrail%2C+1950%E2%80%931976.+Perth%3A+Westrail. 19 pages]. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Speedy keep Thanks for the heads up. There were two difficulties leading to the non-use of the template. First, an editor had discovered that there was a technical problem with the way the template citation linked with sfn inline tags. Instead of fixing that technical problem, the editor deleted the template from the article and substituted a custom made citation. Secondly, various articles have had a custom citation added by other editors in apparent ignorance of the citation template. Both of these difficulties of course defeated the very purpose of the citation template, which is to ensure that a frequently cited book is properly cited uniformly throughout the encyclopedia. I have now fixed the technical problem (which required only the removal of one of the template citation's parameters) and have been adding the template to the pages where it should have been used but wasn't. That should lead to a keeping of the template, which is now on multiple articles as intended. Bahnfrend (talk) 06:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
• :"Speedy keep" a first comment is very meaningless. Gonnym (talk) 08:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Keep per Bahnfrend's explanation, and the high level of utility of the book in the history of rail transport in western australia. JarrahTree 07:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
• Keep, now that it is transcluded in a dozen articles. I have fixed the false-positive sfn errors. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
• Comment This can be closed now since the formatting has been fixed and is now used on the same articles I pointed out in the nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:50, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Second French intervention in Mexico infobox}}

An infobox for this conflict already exists on Second French intervention in Mexico as part of the article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:04, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:There is certainly no benefit in duplication. The sole issue is whether the infobox, which is very large, is better hosted as a separate template or as a part of an already big article. —Brigade Piron (talk) 07:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:Delete as infoboxes should be used directly inside the article. The only reason an infobox like this looks big is because the usage of references inside the infobox contrary to MOS:INFOBOXREF. Gonnym (talk) 08:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

:::Is the statement that "infoboxes should be used directly inside the article" an actual policy, or a statement of preference? Even without references, it would be pretty big. —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

::::Infoboxes are big, tables are big, prose sections are big. Should we start moving everything to stand-alone templates now? Gonnym (talk) 09:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).