Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 8#Template:Hexafluorides
=[[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 8|January 8]]=
== [[Template:Central Coast Mariners FC/colour]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. (Author requests deletion.) Daniel (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Central Coast Mariners FC/colour}}
No transclusions. This template was removed from use in its parent template [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3ACentral_Coast_Mariners_FC&diff=prev&oldid=435208573 in 2011] (at its previous template name), and that parent template has been fine for ten years. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Miss Universe Cambodia]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Miss Universe Cambodia}}
No transclusions. Navbox with no main article and only one other link to an existing article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:34, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Alpha Prime Racing (version 2)]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Alpha Prime Racing (version 2)}}
No transclusions. The more comprehensive and better-named template at {{tl|Alpha Prime Racing}} appears to be preferred. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly we don't need two template for exactly the same thing. {{tl|Alpha Prime Racing}} is the better name, whatever the current content. Nigej (talk) 21:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:CSM București sections]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|CSM București sections}}
No transclusions, no incoming links. Four blue links, five red links, and there is a simple list at the main article, CSM București. It appears that {{cl|CSM București}} is doing the job of this sidebar. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:06, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Just 4 sections in 3 different sports. Realistically the only likely navigation is between the two handball teams, and that's already provided by a hatnote in those 2 articles. So no need for the template. Nigej (talk) 21:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:IFIS]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:FIAV. ✗plicit 00:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|IFIS|module=|type=merge}}
- {{Tfd links|FIAV|module=|type=merge}}
Propose merging Template:IFIS with Template:FIAV.
They are nearly similar and noone understand why there are both of them. W like wiki good to know 20:59, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:Merge. It appears that {{tl|FIAV}} was created in 2007 with the images, and the six-part grid was added later. In 2010, {{tl|IFIS}} was created, even though it appears to duplicate the functionality of FIAV. I do not see any discussions about this apparent redundancy. FIAV has 419 transclusions and appears to be more complete; IFIS has 75 transclusions and should probably be converted into a redirect. Some tweaks may have to be made to the 75 transclusions of IFIS, and case-sensitivity of the parameter values may be an issue during the conversion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
::{{ping|Jonesey95}} yes, I also realised that the problem was maybe just different file names of the symbols, some start with IFIS some with FIAV (see: :commons:Category:Vexillological symbols). So renaming these files would be reasonable. Or is it better to upload copies with new names? Maybe not, this would create new redundancy in commons!? But actually there are allready "redundancies" like :File:FIAV reconstructed.svg and :File:IFIS Reconstruction.svg. --W like wiki good to know 21:59, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:::If the consensus is to merge, all of those details can be worked out. They should be pretty easy; I don't see any technical issues that would block a merge. Redundant files can be deleted once they are no longer needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:::: The files are used in other wikies, so one should leave redirects not to break the articles. Wikisaurus (talk) 23:19, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:::Should it be "reconstructed" or "reconstruction", and so on? It can not find official names, although there is [https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2017/17089-vexillology-symbols.pdf Unicode proposal] and it says "reconstruction"... Wikisaurus (talk) 23:19, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
::::Same answer as above. If there is consensus to merge, we'll figure it out. No big deal. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:50, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:CF Reus Deportiu squad]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|CF Reus Deportiu squad}}
No transclusions. No updates to this roster navbox since 2019, and the team has been dissolved, so there is no possible place for a "current roster" template to live. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Clearly intended to be the current squad Nigej (talk) 21:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 16:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - club dissolved so no need for 'current squad' template. GiantSnowman 16:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== "Rut X" templates ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Rut Agen}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Agen}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Aix}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Ampthill}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Auckland}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Aurillac}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Austin Gilgronis}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Bath}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Bay of Plenty}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Bayonne}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Bedford Blues}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Benetton}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Biarritz}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Black Rams Tokyo}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Blue Bulls}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Blue Bulls U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Blue Bulls U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Blue Bulls XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Blues}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Boland}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Boland Cavaliers}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Boland U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Boland U20}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Boland U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Bordeaux}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Bordeaux Bègles}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Border}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Border Bulldogs}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Border U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Border U20}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Border U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Bourg-en-Bresse}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Brisbane City}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Bristol Bears}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Brive}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Brumbies}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Brumbies/doc}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Buller}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Bulls}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Bush}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Béziers}}
- {{tfd links|Rut CPUT}}
- {{tfd links|Rut CUT Ixias}}
- {{tfd links|Rut CUT Young Guns}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Cafeteros Pro}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Canberra Vikings}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Canon Eagles}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Canterbury}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Carcassonne}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Cardiff}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Cardiff Blues}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Castres}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Cats}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Cheetahs}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Cheetahs XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Chiefs}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Chugoku Red Regulions}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Clermont}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Cobras Brasil XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Coca-Cola Red Sparks}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Colomiers}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Connacht}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Cornish Pirates}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Counties Manukau}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Country Eagles}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Coventry}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Crusaders}}
- {{tfd links|Rut DUT RHINOS}}
- {{tfd links|Rut DUT Rhinos}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Dallas Jackals}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Dax}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Doncaster Knights}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Dragons}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Drua}}
- {{tfd links|Rut EP Invitational XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Ealing Trailfinders}}
- {{tfd links|Rut East Cape XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut East Coast}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Eastern Free State}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Eastern Province}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Eastern Province Elephants}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Eastern Province Kings}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Eastern Province U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Eastern Province U20}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Eastern Province U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Eastern Transvaal}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Edinburgh}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Emerging Cheetahs}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Exeter Chiefs}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Falcons}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Falcons U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Falcons U20}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Falcons U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Far North}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Fijian Drua}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Force}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Force/doc}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Free State}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Free State Cheetahs}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Free State U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Free State U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Free State XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Gauteng Falcons}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Gauteng Lions}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Glasgow Warriors}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Gloucester}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Golden Lions}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Golden Lions U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Golden Lions U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Golden Lions XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Greater Sydney Rams}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Green Rockets Tokatsu}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Grenoble}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Griffons}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Griffons U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Griffons U20}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Griffons U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Griqualand West}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Griquas}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Griquas U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Griquas U20}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Griquas U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Hanazono Kintetsu Liners}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Harlequins}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Hartpury University}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Hawke's Bay}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Highlanders}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Hino Red Dolphins}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Honda Heat}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Horowhenua-Kapiti}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Horowhenua Kapiti}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Houston SaberCats}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Hurricanes}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Jaguares}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Jaguares XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Jersey Reds}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Kamaishi Seawaves}}
- {{tfd links|Rut King Country}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Kings}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Kintetsu Liners}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Kobelco Kobe Steelers}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Kobelco Steelers}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Kubota Spears}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Kurita Water Gush}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Kurita Water Gush Akishima}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Kyuden Voltex}}
- {{tfd links|Rut LA Giltinis}}
- {{tfd links|Rut La Rochelle}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Leeds Tykes}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Leicester Tigers}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Leinster}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Leopards}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Leopards U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Leopards U20}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Leopards U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Leopards XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Limpopo Blue Bulls}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Limpopo Blue Bulls U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Limpopo Blue Bulls U20}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Limpopo Blue Bulls U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Lions}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Lions XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut London Irish}}
- {{tfd links|Rut London Scottish}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Lowveld}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Lyon}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Manawatu}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Marlborough}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Maties}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Maties Juniors}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Melbourne Rising}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Mid Canterbury}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Mie Honda Heat}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Mighty Elephants}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Mitsubishi DynaBoars}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Moana Pasifika}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Mont-de-Marsan}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Montauban}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Montpellier}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Mpumalanga Pumas}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Munakata Sanix Blues}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Munster}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NEC Green Rockets}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NMMU Madibaz}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NMMU Young Guns}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NMU Madibaz}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NSW Country}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NSW Country Eagles}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NTT Red Hurricanes}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NTT Shining Arcs}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NWU Eagles}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NWU Pukke}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NWU Pukke Young Guns}}
- {{tfd links|Rut NWU Vaal Triangle}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Namibia Kudus}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Narbonne}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Natal}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Natal Wildebeest}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Natal Wildebeeste}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Nelson}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Nelson Bays}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Nevers}}
- {{tfd links|Rut New England Free Jacks}}
- {{tfd links|Rut New Orleans Gold}}
- {{tfd links|Rut New South Wales}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Newcastle Falcons}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Nice}}
- {{tfd links|Rut North Eastern Cape}}
- {{tfd links|Rut North Harbour}}
- {{tfd links|Rut North Harbour Rays}}
- {{tfd links|Rut North Otago}}
- {{tfd links|Rut North West}}
- {{tfd links|Rut North Western Cape}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Northampton Saints}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Northern Free State}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Northern Natal}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Northern Transvaal}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Northland}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Nottingham}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Old Glory DC}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Olímpia Lions}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Ospreys}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Otago}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Oyonnax}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Pampas XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Panasonic Wild Knights}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Pau}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Perpignan}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Perth Spirit}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Peñarol}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Poverty Bay}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Provence}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Provence Rugby}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Pumas}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Pumas U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Pumas U20}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Pumas U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Queensland}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Queensland Country}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Racing 92}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Racing Métro}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Rebels}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Rebels/doc}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Reds}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Reds/doc}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Rhodes}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Richmond}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Ricoh Black Rams}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Rouen}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Rugby ATL}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Rugby United NY}}
- {{tfd links|Rut SARA}}
- {{tfd links|Rut SARU}}
- {{tfd links|Rut SWD Eagles}}
- {{tfd links|Rut SWD U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut SWD U20}}
- {{tfd links|Rut SWD U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Saitama Wild Knights}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sale Sharks}}
- {{tfd links|Rut San Diego Legion}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Saracens}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Scarlets}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Seattle Seawolves}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Selknam}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sharks}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sharks (Currie Cup)}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sharks Invitational XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sharks U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sharks U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sharks XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Shimizu Blue Sharks}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Shimizu Koto Blue Sharks}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Shining Arcs}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Shizuoka Blue Revs}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Simba XV}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Skyactivs Hiroshima}}
- {{tfd links|Rut South Canterbury}}
- {{tfd links|Rut South Eastern Transvaal}}
- {{tfd links|Rut South West Africa}}
- {{tfd links|Rut South Western Districts}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Southern Kings}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Southland}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Soyaux Angoulême}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Stade Français}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Stellaland}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Stormers}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Suntory Sungoliath}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sunwolves}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sydney}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sydney (NRC team)}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sydney Rays}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Sydney Stars}}
- {{tfd links|Rut TUT Vikings}}
- {{tfd links|Rut TUT Vikings Young Guns}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Taranaki}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Tasman}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Thames Valley}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Tokyo Sungoliath}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Toronto Arrows}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Toulon}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Toulouse}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Toyota Shokki}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Toyota Verblitz}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Transvaal}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UCT Ikey Tigers}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UCT Trojans}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UC Vikings}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UFH Blues}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UFS Shimlas}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UFS Shimlas Young Guns}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UJ}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UJ Young Guns}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UKZN Impi}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UP Tuks}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UP Tuks Young Guns}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UWC}}
- {{tfd links|Rut UWC Young Guns}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Ulster}}
- {{tfd links|Rut University of Canberra Vikings}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Utah Warriors}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Vaal Triangle}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Valence Romans}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Vannes}}
- {{tfd links|Rut WSU All Blacks}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Waikato}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Wairarapa Bush}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Wanganui}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Waratahs}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Waratahs/doc}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Wasps}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Wellington}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Welwitschias}}
- {{tfd links|Rut West Coast}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Western Province}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Western Province League}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Western Province U19}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Western Province U21}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Western Sydney Rams}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Western Transvaal}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Winelands}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Wits}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Wits Young Guns}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Worcester Warriors}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Yamaha Júbilo}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Yokohama Canon Eagles}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Yorkshire Carnegie}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Zebre}}
- {{tfd links|Rut Zebre Parma}}
This is a bit of a procedural nomination for the templates listed here; following this discussion (permalink), in which the {{((}}Rut X{{))}} templates were replaced by {{tlf|Rut|X}}, mainly to avoid the necessity of having a template for every team. This replacement has been performed, so all that's left is to rubber-stamp the deletion of the individual team templates. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all Procedural deletion following template replacement thanks to the great work by Primefac. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:09, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all Excellent work. Nigej (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. See Template talk:Rut for details on the migration process, which I believe is complete at this time. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:Delete as simple cleanup. The templates are now permanently unused so serve no more use. :Category:Rus templates by country should probably also receive the same treatment. Gonnym (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
::Rus templates are different to Rut templates (Rut templates are for teams, Rus templates are for stadia) so I wouldn't delete at this stage as they haven't been updated yet and are all still in use in their original form, but Primefac is aware and will likely do the same changes for this when he has the time to do so. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 12:25, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
:::However :Category:Rut templates and it's subcategories can be nominated if the result of this discussion is delete. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 15:09, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
::::Correct; should this TFD be closed as delete, the category and its subcategories can be deleted via WP:G8. Primefac (talk) 17:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Discussed in Discord]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Discussed in Discord}}
No transclusions, no documentation. Created in mid-2020, and does not appear to have been used after almost two years. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment it seems like this should exist, if we are using Discord for official/administrative/technical Wikipedia conversations, like IRC did, since the description at WP:DISCORD mentions, this seems to be occurring, even if not WMF sanctioned -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 00:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Doc added; fixed an error in the box (the option for "small"=no was incorrect, it shouldn't exist as an option) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 00:53, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No one is using, not even the creator. I don't think any of the Discord users are aware of its existence. I'm not aware of an IRC equivalent. -- ferret (talk) 04:50, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Ferret. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:13, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Something we can do without. Nigej (talk) 17:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Development regions of Romania]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Development regions of Romania}}
No transclusions. Has been replaced by the more comprehensive {{tl|NUTS-RO}} in the articles that it links to. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as unused. As noted there is a preferred alternative. Nigej (talk) 18:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Derbyshire districts map]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 00:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Derbyshire districts map}}
No transclusions. Was apparently used at Derbyshire for a while, but this article content has been replaced with actual in-article content instead of a template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:19, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Whilst admitting I wasn't aware of this template until it appeared in Article Alerts at Wikipedia:WikiProject Derbyshire, I can see that it is very well-constructed, accurate and informative and does have potential uses, especially as it enables interactive zooming in. For example, now I know it exists, I'm minded to use it in the upper part of that project page, which I try to keep up-to-date, and feel it could be more helpful than the current map at List of civil parishes in Derbyshire. Because of its quality, I feel this is a good example of not deleting something that would be difficult to replace and could still be used in the future. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:12, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- :I have now made small modifications and utilised this interactive template in the introduction at WP:Derbyshire. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Nick Moyes, whose arguments I find very persuasive. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment from nominator. I am happy for this to be kept as long as it is transcluded somewhere. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Defacto rulers of Japan]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Defacto rulers of Japan}}
No transclusions, no incoming links. This content appears to be formatted better in articles like Sesshō and Kampaku. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unused. Minute overlapping text makes it pretty unintelligible. If something is required in the future I don't think this would form the basis of it. Nigej (talk) 19:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Hexafluorides]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There seems to be some indication that splitting, merging, or otherwise modifying the existing templates is necessary, but no one seems keen on outright deletion or straight merging through any of the proposed suggestions. There's no prejudice against any of the above (merging, splitting, etc) but it might take a bit more discussion on the related template's talk page(s) and/or involving the Chemistry WikiProject for their opinion(s). If one or more of these templates ends up disused or otherwise a consensus forms from subsequent discussions, there is no prejudice against renomination here. Primefac (talk) 21:41, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
{{anchor|Template:Fluorides}}
- {{Tfd links|Hexafluorides|module=|type=merge}}
- {{Tfd links|Fluorides|module=|type=merge}}
- {{Tfd links|Fluorine compounds|module=|type=merge}}
Propose merging Template:Hexafluorides with Template:Fluorine compounds.
Propose merging Template:Fluorides with Template:Fluorine compounds.
Looks like the first is already covered by the second and the second is covered by the third. ~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:22, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- I would recommend splitting Fluorine compounds and fluorides templates more so that there is less overlap as there are a very large number of fluorine compounds. Fluorides template can concentrate on simple inorganic and ionic compounds. But I agree with merging hexafluorides with fluorides template, as it is just a subcollection. Fluorine compounds can stick with complex molecular compounds, and fluoroanions. Drop the periodic table from it.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note Template:tetrafluoroborates also overlaps Template:Fluorine compounds. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:32, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- If Template:Tetrafluoroborates have enough articles inside, it should have it's own template. --Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 03:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- That's what I think too. Instead it could be separated/split from Template:fluorine compounds, which can end up linking the major classes, or odd substances that don't fit in. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:11, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- I think the merge into one or the other of the two fluorides/fluorine compounds would be trivial, whereas it's not obvious to me that they should be split. No strong opinion here. --Izno (talk) 05:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- My opinion for these templates:
- Template:Fluorides put binary fluorine compounds(only fluorine and one other element).
- Template:Fluorine compounds put oxofluorides, salts of those fluoroanions(such as (NH4)SiF6), organofluorine compounds and any fluorine compound except binary fluorides.
- Templates about fluoroanions(such as Template:Tetrafluoroborates, Template:Hexafluorophosphates) can be created if they have enough articles inside.
- Template:Hexafluorides...I don't care.
--Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 14:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Calphotos/url]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Calphotos/url}}
Unused subtemplate of calphotos. User:GKFXtalk 09:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment it's too inflexible to use, as it takes the pagename directly without parameter input options, so if the page is disambiguated, it could go off kilter -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 01:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Flush left]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Flush left}}
Unused template to apply an (arbitrary?) negative left margin. User:GKFXtalk 09:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I suspect this template depends on the skin you are using on Wikipedia. It should display incorrectly if the skin doesn't use an offset of 1.8em padding to the left bar margin. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 01:11, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Infobox Buddha]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 00:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Infobox Buddha|module=|type=merge}}
- {{Tfd links|Infobox deity|module=|type=merge}}
Propose merging Template:Infobox Buddha with Template:Infobox deity.
The template has many overlapping attributes with the deity infobox, which is more comprehensive. Redtigerxyz Talk 06:37, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment depending on how you look at it, a Buddha is a saint {{tl|infobox saint}} or a diety or something else -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 01:23, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment would the merge be a subtemplate of the remaining fields, that hooks into the "mother" template using a {{para|module#}} to activate it? (similarly to how {{tl|infobox person}} works) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 16:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Anyone who knows anything about Buddhism knows that Buddha is a title meaning "awakened one" (see Buddhahood). It refers to a person, not a deity. While it may be true that some revere Gautama Buddha as akin to a diety, other Buddhas are more like gurus or saints. Peaceray (talk) 16:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- oppose As far as I know Buddha is not a god.Slatersteven (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - Buddhas are humans, not deities. Buddhas have different qualities and background than deities. They have teachers, students, and lineages, none of which are or should be in the deity template. Skyerise (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment the nominator did not follow correct procedure: did not notify interested Wikiprojects - not WP Buddhism or WP Religion, which would obviously be interested projects, or the template's creators or maintainers. From this I am left to wonder: are they anti-Buddhist? certainly they are not knowledgeable about Buddhism if they could think this a reasonable proposal. I suggest they withdraw the nomination due to procedural omissions. Skyerise (talk) 16:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- oppose Buddhism is related to deities, though not a subset of them. --- FULBERT (talk) 18:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Strong oppose If by "deity" we are referring to gods or goddesses, Buddhas does not fit the description, as has been already noted above. And so it would be a factual error to merge them into one as that would assume Buddhas are deities. If the current infobox lacks anything relevant that the deity-infobox has, just add those parameters to the Buddha-infobox? Sigvid (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Constituencies in Pays de la Loire]] and similar ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:54, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Constituencies in Pays de la Loire}}
- {{Tfd links|Constituencies of Ain}}
- {{Tfd links|Constituencies in Vendée}}
- {{Tfd links|Constituencies in Pyrenees-Atlantiques}}
No transclusions. {{tl|French National Assembly constituencies}} appears to be the preferred navbox; it is much more comprehensive. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:33, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as unused. All a bit of a mess. As noted we have {{tl|French National Assembly constituencies}} which covers the whole of France. We have templates for some of the 18 regions like the Pays de la Loire one and {{tl|Constituencies in Normandy}} and we have templates for some of the 100-odd departments like the Ain, Vendée, Pyrenees-Atlantiques ones but also others like {{tl|Constituencies in Landes}} which are used. Sometimes we have articles like Loire-Atlantique's 1st constituency which have two templates, generally undesirable when they're covering the same thing. Seems to me that the regional-level ones are about the right size for useful navigation. The department-level templates are often too small and the national-level one is perhaps too large. Nigej (talk) 10:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- :@Nigej I'm left confused by your last statement. If the regional level should be kept, why did you vote to delete Template:Constituencies in Pays de la Loire? Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- ::Because it's unused. Happy to keep if that's the way the discussion goes. Nigej (talk) 14:09, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Companies trading in the La Paz Stock Exchange]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Companies trading in the La Paz Stock Exchange}}
No transclusions. The main article for this navbox is poorly sourced, with no reference to companies that trade in the exchange, whatever that might mean. The companies' articles do not mention that they trade in the exchange. I don't think that the articles listed in this navbox are verifiably tied together in a way that justifies a navbox for them. A category would work just fine, if there is some characteristic that they actually have in common. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A pretty random selection of companies. As noted it's better covered by categories. Nigej (talk) 10:26, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Commonwealth realms map]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Commonwealth realms map}}
No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links. There is an equivalent map at Commonwealth realm, which is the logical place for this article content. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Basically a duplicate of the file. If we need to transclude the file to multiple pages, we simply transclude the file. Unnecessary. Unused. DrKay (talk) 08:09, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above. as noted, we don't need a separate template for a map. Nigej (talk) 10:27, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Category pair/core]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:52, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Category pair/core}}
No transclusions. No longer needed after the parent template [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3ACategory_pair&type=revision&diff=1060715980&oldid=860453819 was converted to Lua]. This should be routine housekeeping. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Cat more if exists/core]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Cat more if exists/core}}
No transclusions. No longer needed after [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3ACat_more_if_exists&type=revision&diff=981634437&oldid=947163987 the parent template was converted to use Lua]. This should be routine housekeeping. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Campaignbox Sit-in movement]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Campaignbox Sit-in movement}}
No transclusions. Covered much more comprehensively by {{tl|Sit-in movement}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Basically {{tl|Sit-in movement}} with all the red links removed and turned into a sidebar. We don't need both and I think the navbox approach is better. Nigej (talk) 17:11, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Campaignbox communist rebellion in the Philippines]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Campaignbox communist rebellion in the Philippines}}
No transclusions. Created in 2015. Appears to have been superseded by navboxes, including {{tl|The Marcoses}} and {{tl|Martial EDSA}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:06, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:I created it while expanding the Communist rebellion in the Philippines article years ago. After a while I stopped watching that page because of constant edit warring on it and it seems like someone removed it. I think I can serve a purpose if someone includes more articles into it (or at least redlinks), otherwise just delete it.--Catlemur (talk) 08:46, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Lanlp 1]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Lanlp 1}}
While this template is tagged as transclusionless, I don't really think this is being used. The fact that it has no documentation or talk page is also a red flag. Gonnym (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:Delete, it served a purpose in Help:Template until [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help%3ATemplate&diff=prev&oldid=407880555 this edit 18:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)] by {{u|Kotniski}}. — Jeff G. ツ 00:54, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Box/main]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:04, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Box/main}}
Unused subtemplate. User:GKFXtalk 00:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per G7 Unused subtemplate of the box template created by me that serves no purpose.– BrandonXLF (talk) 00:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
== [[Template:Box-shadow border/css]] ==
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 14:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- {{Tfd links|Box-shadow border/css}}
Unused subtemplate, seems to have been used for applying CSS vendor prefixes to box-shadow. User:GKFXtalk 00:03, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).