Login
Login

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 May 1#Template:European Youth Baseball Championship

< April 30

May 2 >

=[[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 May 1|May 1]]=

== [[Template:Liga de Fútbol Profesional Boliviano seasons]] ==

  • {{Tfd links|Liga de Fútbol Profesional Boliviano seasons}}

see Template:Bolivian Primera División ... this one seems redundant Vlz.matthew (talk) 22:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 14:03, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep - it is standard to have separate temples when there are sufficient seasons, which I say there are here (going back 70 years!), see e.g. {{tl|Ligue 1}} and {{tl|Ligue 1 seasons}}. GiantSnowman 14:06, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment - {{Ping|GiantSnowman}} , I see what you mean, but in this case, in this template

{{Bolivian Primera División}}

there is a section with all the seasons in the template;

in this template:

{{Ligue 1}}

there is no section for seasons. So I guess the right move would be to remove the seasons from the first template i mentioned, and then move them to this template:

{{Liga de Fútbol Profesional Boliviano seasons}}

Also want to note that the template above needs updating, stops at 2015-16.

== [[Template:Wikidata list script]] ==

  • {{Tfd links|Wikidata list script}}

No documentation. This template was created in 2018 and does not appear to have been adopted. I tried to make it work, but it did not propose adding any text to my common.js file (which is currently blank). This looks like an abandoned experiment. Delete from pages where it is transcluded, since it does not work. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Template:Infobox university/wikidata]] ==

  • {{Tfd links|Infobox university/wikidata}}

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Created in 2017. It pulls almost nothing from Wikidata. This looks like an abandoned test. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Template:Infobox interpretation of quantum mechanics]] ==

  • {{Tfd links|Infobox interpretation of quantum mechanics}}

No transclusions. This is a proposed template that was rejected by consensus. See the template's talk page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete: This template is inappropriate in WP. It provides a set of yes/no attributes for any given "interpretation of quantum mechanics", but these have no clear yes/no answers, and thus force the editor into thumb-sucking, as should be clear from the talk page comments. I'll add that an "interpretation of quantum mechanics" is ill-defined as well, despite the article. —Quondum 15:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete Thankfully nobody uses it, but the last thing I want to see in an article about an interpretation is such a simplistic table. Tercer (talk) 06:21, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Template:European Youth Baseball Championship]] ==

  • {{Tfd links|European Youth Baseball Championship}}

Navbox containing no links. Linked articles have been deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Template:Db-f7/Clear copyfraud]] ==

  • {{Tfd links|Db-f7/Clear copyfraud}}

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links to explain why it was created. The template appears to make a legal claim, which is probably not advisable. I read the explanation given by the template five times but emerged no clearer on what it is supposed to mean or how it is supposed to be used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete. Judging by their contributions, I think the precision of the creator's English-language writing is a little bit lower than would be ideal, and so their intent is unclear. That's unfortunately substandard for a template describing a potentially complex situation, and it's better to delete it and let them flesh out the issue in discussion at WT:CSD. I speculate that the creator is concerned with people or stock photo agencies claiming copyright over free media (see their creation {{tl|False copyright}}), thus forcing English Wikipedia down the road of tagging it as fair use instead of free. I think their ultimate goal is to get those files deleted from here, and uploaded to Commons instead. If I understand what they're going for, this template seems a little redundant to CSD F7c or F8 (depending on whether the free replacement is similar or identical). TheFeds 19:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Vestrian24Bio 09:22, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 01:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Template:Main mission failure]] ==

  • {{Tfd links|Main mission failure}}

No transclusions. No incoming links that explain why it was created. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep, since I think the intent is to indicate the degree of success of aerospace launches or tests like {{tl|Success}} and {{tl|Partial failure}}. (Do we need to categorize them? For aerospace, or just generically as outcomes?) A use case for this template might be a launch with 2 payloads, with the more important one not deployed to the correct orbit. @JFG (creator of those others) may have an opinion. TheFeds 19:16, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete unused. Vestrian24Bio 09:19, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Module:LowercaseFirstLetter]] ==

  • {{Tfd links|LowercaseFirstLetter|module=Module:}}

Delete per WP:TFD#REASONS 2. I made this module to be used on the {{tl|R from domain name}} template, but I've since created a better module: {{ml|Domain handler|}}. It does the same job and more, such as detecting top-level domains. This old module isn't used anywhere now, so it's no longer needed. If someone finds a good reason to keep it or a place where it can be used, I'll be happy to withdraw this nomination. Xoontor (talk) 10:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:Delete as per nom. Dpleibovitz (talk) 03:00, 2 May 2025 (UTC)