Wikipedia:Tiers of reliability#Tier 3: reliable

{{essay|WP:TIERS|interprets=the accepted levels of evidence on Wikipedia}}

Tier 1: most reliable

{{shortcut|WP:TIER1}}

{{main|WP:SCHOLARSHIP}}

{{further|Academic publishing|Rankings of academic publishers}}

= Peer-reviewed publications =

{{further|List of academic databases and search engines|Lists of academic journals}}

  • Peer-reviewed articles in academic journals
  • Literature reviews, systematic reviews, and other review articles
  • Peer-reviewed conference papers
  • Examples:
  • {{cite journal |doi=10.1017/S0261143014000270|title='Find out what it means to me': Aretha Franklin's gendered re-authoring of Otis Redding's 'Respect' |year=2014 |last1=Malawey |first1=Victoria |journal=Popular Music |volume=33 |issue=2 |pages=185–207 |s2cid=161360928 }}
  • {{cite journal |doi=10.1080/0740770X.2016.1183981|title=Souls intact: The soul performances of Audre Lorde, Aretha Franklin, and Nina Simone |year=2016 |last1=Lordi |first1=Emily J. |journal=Women & Performance |volume=26 |issue=1 |pages=55–71 |s2cid=194498055 }}

= Academic books =

{{further|List of university presses}}

Tier 2: more reliable

{{shortcut|WP:TIER2}}

= Non-peer-reviewed academic publications =

  • Non-peer-reviewed articles in academic journals, e.g. Science [https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/03/nih-director-apologizes-structural-racism-pledges-actions] or Nature [https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00432-1]
  • Book reviews in academic journals
  • Non-peer-reviewed conference papers
  • Example: {{cite journal |doi=10.1525/jpms.2019.311002|title=Remembering Aretha Franklin |year=2019 |last1=Fink |first1=Robert |last2=Weisbard |first2=Eric |last3=Dibbell |first3=Carola |last4=Christgau |first4=Georgia |last5=Tate |first5=Greg |last6=Denise |first6=Dj Lynnée |journal=Journal of Popular Music Studies |volume=31 |issue=1 |pages=3–14 |s2cid=150034745 }}

= Mass-market books =

{{further|List of English-language book publishing companies}}

= Highly-reputable international journalism =

{{main|WP:NEWSORG}}

Tier 3: reliable

{{shortcut|WP:TIER3}}

= Tertiary sources =

{{further

|Wikipedia:Identifying and using tertiary sources |l1=Identifying and using tertiary sources (WP:TERTIARYUSE)

|Wikipedia:Tertiary-source fallacy |l2=Tertiary-source fallacy (WP:TSF)

|Wikipedia:Dictionaries as sources |l3=Dictionaries as sources (WP:DICTS)

}}

= Other generally reliable news sources =

{{further|WP:RSP|l1=WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources| Wikipedia:Otto Middleton (or why newspapers are dubious sources) |l2=Otto Middleton (or why newspapers are dubious sources) (WP:OTTO)}}

  • National and international journalism that is less than top-rated
  • Regional and local news ("Channel 5 news", local newspapers)
  • Trade publications
  • Any source listed as green at WP:RSP would be at least in this tier
  • Example: Brian McCollum (August 16, 2018). [https://www.freep.com/story/entertainment/music/2018/08/16/aretha-franklin-dies/309137002/ "Aretha Franklin dies at 76: Detroit star transformed American music"]. Detroit Free Press.

= Expert self-published =

  • Snow Lion Publications [https://www.shambhala.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/03.pdf]
  • Doctoral theses
  • Example: Charles Kronengold, interviewed by Robin Wander (August 29, 2018). [https://news.stanford.edu/2018/08/29/stanford-musicologist-reflects-multimusical-aretha-franklin/ "Stanford musicologist reflects on 'multimusical' Aretha Franklin"]. Stanford University.

Tier 4: limited use

{{shortcut|WP:TIER4}}

= Non-expert self-published =

{{further|Wikipedia:Vanity and predatory publishing |l1=Vanity and predatory publishing (WP:VANPRED) |WP:ABOUTSELF}}

  • Official websites, brochures and other promotional materials
  • Opinion/editorial (see WP:RSOPINION)
  • vanity press
  • predatory publishing
  • churnalism
  • government propaganda
  • Undergraduate and graduate theses
  • Examples:
  • [https://www.arethafranklin.net/ Aretha Franklin Official Website]
  • Michael Eric Dyson (August 16, 2018). [https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/16/opinion/aretha-franklin-church-detroit.html "The Church of Aretha Franklin: How the Queen of Soul preached to us all"] (op-ed). The New York Times.
  • Pamela J. Greene (December 1995). "Aretha Franklin: The Emergence of Soul and Black Women's Consciousness in the Late 1960s and 1970s"] (PhD dissertation). Graduate College, Bowling Green State University.

= Questionable sources =

{{further|WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources}}

  • Sources listed as yellow at WP:RSP
  • Example: Samatha Schnurr (August 16, 2018). [https://www.eonline.com/news/959719/aretha-franklin-queen-of-soul-dead-at-76 "Aretha Franklin, "Queen of Soul," Dead at 76"]. E! News.

= Primary sources =

{{further|Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources |l1=Identifying and using primary sources (WP:USEPRIMARY)}}

See also

;Policies

  • Verifiability (WP:V)
  • No original research (WP:NOR)

;Guidelines

;Explanatory supplements

;General essays

;Topic-specific essays

  • Identifying reliable sources (history) (WP:HISTRS)
  • Identifying reliable sources (law) (WP:RSLAW)
  • Identifying reliable sources (science) (WP:SCIRS)
  • Identifying reliable sources (medicine) (WP:MEDRS)
  • Identifying and using style guides (WP:STYLEGUIDES)
  • Using maps and similar sources in Wikipedia articles (WP:MAPCITE)

;Other

  • Reliable sources/Noticeboard (WP:RSN)
  • Reliable sources/Perennial sources (WP:RSP)
  • Common knowledge (WP:CK)
  • How to mine a source (WP:MINE)

Category:Wikipedia essays about reliable sources