Wikipedia:Version 0.5 FA Review

The criteria for importance and quality apply, but the group has (after much heated discussion agreed on this consensus view for FAs:

• They should nearly all pass on quality, only failing on quality in exceptional circumstances - where we find one that is well below our modern standards.
• The vast majority of FAs should also be allowed to pass on importance, only being rejected in cases of very low importance (like Spoo) with the agreement of three reviewers signing #Importance review.

Please sign your name up if you are going to work on a section - please aim to complete the section by August 31.

Now it is August 31, please sign up for any sections that still need work, and aim to complete them by September 30. We will probably end all reviewing on September 30 (yet to be agreed).

Please remove a section and its entry if it has been completely reviewed.

Language and linguistics

NEEDS REVIEWING IN SEPTEMBER

• Eyu100^{(t|[http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Eyu100 fr]|Version 1.0 Editorial Team)} 17:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Law

NEEDS REVIEWING IN SEPTEMBER

Mathematics

NEEDS REVIEWING IN SEPTEMBER

Media

NEEDS REVIEWING IN SEPTEMBER

• Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Zzzzz 22:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Music

STILL NEEDS REVIEWING IN SEPTEMBER

• Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Zzzzz 22:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Walkerma 21:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Philosophy

NEEDS REVIEWING IN SEPTEMBER

Physics and astronomy

Mainly done.

• Titoxd^(?!?) 05:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• NCurse
• Runningonbrains 04:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Politics and government

STILL NEEDS REVIEWING IN SEPTEMBER

Walkerma 21:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Royalty, nobility, and heraldry

STILL NEEDS REVIEWING IN SEPTEMBER

Sport and games

Partly done, still NEEDS WORK

• Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Zzzzz 22:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Nifboy 06:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Runningonbrains 01:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Transport

STILL NEEDS REVIEWING IN SEPTEMBER

War

ALMOST COMPLETE: Thanks Kirill!

• Kirill Lokshin 15:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Version_0.5_Nominations&action=purge Purge page cache]

| width="32%" style="vertical-align:top;padding:1em; border:1px solid #dfdfdf; background-color:#FFDDDD" |

• Reviews should only be done by members of the review team (if you want to help sign up here).
• Reviewers then pick an area of interest to them and sign up there.
• The reviewer should not have been a significant contributor to the article under review.

As time allows, each reviewer will check articles on their list based on the criteria above. With most articles expected to pass, this should be a relatively straightforward review process, easy to complete by August 31 2006. Note that an article should only be removed from the list if it loses its FA status. After an article has been reviewed, the following process is carried out:

Image:ButtonGreen.svg

1. "Strikeout" the article name on this page, using and .
2. Place the {{V0.5|class=XX|category=YY}} template on its talk page. See {{tl|V0.5}} for details of classes and categories.
3. List the article on Wikipedia:Version 0.5 under the appropriate section.

Image:ButtonYellow.svg

If the article is of acceptable quality, but on a topic outside the scope of the V0.5 release:

1. Leave a comment next to the article name on this page
2. Leave a comment below in the importance review section.
3. After a total of three reviewers (including yourself) agree and sign that the article should not be included, strikeout the article name, using and and leave a comment such as "scope" or "importance".
4. If consensus is not reached in the importance review section, and one reviewer believes strongly that this article should be included, then the article should be passed for Version 0.5 (see above).
5. Articles that fail on importance are listed here Wikipedia:Version 0.5 FA Review/Archived nominations.

Image:ButtonRed.svg

If the article fails to meet the criteria because of quality issues:

1. Consider requesting a cleanup of the article using cleanup tags or requests on the talk page.
2. Consider nominating the article for WP:FARC.
3. Consider a clear reason on the article's talk page.'''
4. "Strikeout" the article name on this page, using and , and place a comment next to the article name indicating briefly why the article failed, and any action taken.

|}

If you think an article from your section is too obscure to be included, please list it here and sign. If two others agree and sign, and no one disagrees, strikeout the article name (using and ) and leave a comment such as "scope" or "importance". If one reviewer disagrees, the article should be included in V0.5.

{{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Aramaic language}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Gbe languages}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Ido}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Laal language}}

· Nafaanra language

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Portuguese language}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Russian language}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Split infinitive}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Stuttering}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Swedish language}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Taiwanese (linguistics)}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Tamil language}}

· Thou

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Vowel}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Vulgar Latin}}

{{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Article 153 of the Constitution of Malaysia}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Article One of the United States Constitution}}

· Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Common scold}}

· Dietrich v The Queen

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Dred Scott v. Sandford}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Equal Protection Clause}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Federalist No. 10}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|First Amendment to the United States Constitution}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|French law on secularity and conspicuous religious symbols in schools}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|James Bulger}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Lawrence v. Texas}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Paragraph 175}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Constitution of May 3, 1791}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Roe v. Wade}}

· Schabir Shaik trial

· Section summary of the USA PATRIOT Act, Title II

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Separation of powers under the United States Constitution}}

{{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Ackermann function}}

Eric Bana

Louis Armstrong

{{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Michel Foucault}}

{{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Apollo 8}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|H II region}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Herbig-Haro object}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Soap bubble}}

{{FA/BeenOnMainPage|1996 U.S. campaign finance scandal}}

{{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Anne, Queen of Great Britain}}

{{FA/BeenOnMainPage|1896 Summer Olympics}}

{{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Air Force One}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Indian Railways}}

• John Bull (locomotive)

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|London Underground}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Manila Light Rail Transit System}}

• Manila Metro Rail Transit System

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Mercedes-Benz 450SEL 6.9}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Mini}}

• Montréal-Mirabel International Airport

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|MTR}}

• O-Bahn Busway

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Panama Canal}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Pan American World Airways}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Pioneer Zephyr}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Pulaski Skyway}}

• Rail transport in India

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Ridge Route}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|RMS Titanic}}

• Rogers Locomotive and Machine Works

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Ryanair}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Space elevator}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|SS Andrea Doria}}

• Talbot Tagora

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|TGV}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Warren County Canal}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Wigwag (railroad)}}

• {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Zeppelin}}

{{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Algerian Civil War}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Battle of Hampton Roads}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Battle of Inchon}}

· Convair B-36

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Karl Dönitz}}

· First Battle of the Stronghold

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Lord's Resistance Army}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Polish September Campaign}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Siege}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Tank}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Trench warfare}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|USS Missouri (BB-63)}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|War elephant}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|War of the Spanish Succession}}

· {{FA/BeenOnMainPage|Warsaw Uprising}}

__NOTOC__

{{Version 0.5 pages}}

Version 0.5 FA Review

Version 0.5 FA Review