Login
Login

Wikipedia:WikiLeaks is not part of Wikipedia

{{for|WikiLeaks' entry on the list of perennial sources|Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#WikiLeaks}}

{{nutshell|The website WikiLeaks, which publicizes leaked information, is not in any way affiliated with Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation. It is an entirely separate website run by people who have no connection to Wikimedia.|shortcut=WP:WIKILEAKS|shortcut2=WP:NOTLEAKS}}

File:WikiLeaks is not a Wikimedia project.png

WikiLeaks is not affiliated with Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation in any way whatsoever.

"Wiki" is a generic word that anyone can use; it is not a brand name or trademark. A wiki is any website that allows the creation and editing of interlinked webpages via a web browser. There are many wikis in existence, run by various organizations, which contain various types of content; thus, albeit one of the largest and best-known examples, Wikipedia is only one wiki among many. The term "wiki" was coined in 1994–1995 by Ward Cunningham, the inventor of the concept, who also created its first implementation.See History of wikis The term was thus already in existence prior to the advent of Wikipedia (6–7 years later, in 2001),See History of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation therefore does not claim ownership of the term in any way.{{cite news |url=https://blog.wikimedia.org/2010/12/09/whats-in-a-name-in-the-case-of-wiki-lots-of-things/ |title=What's in a name? In the case of 'wiki', lots of things. |date=9 December 2010 |work=Wikimedia blog |publisher=Wikimedia Foundation |accessdate=2010-12-12}}

The Wikimedia Foundation has officially stated that there is no relationship between WikiLeaks and Wikipedia or Wikimedia. In an 11 August 2010 article in The Daily Telegraph (London), Wikipedia's co-founder Jimmy Wales stated that he has had no connection with the Wikileaks.org website.{{cite news |url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/100005434/jimmy-wales-people-think-im-responsible-for-wikileaks/ |title=Jimmy Wales: people think I'm responsible for Wikileaks |last=Richmond |first=Shane |date=11 August 2010 |work=Media blog (The Daily Telegraph) |location= London |accessdate=2010-12-01}}

Despite its name, since at least May 2010, WikiLeaks includes no wiki features, like editing or commenting by readers.{{cite news |url=http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/05/wikileaks-assange-returns |title=WikiLeaks Gets A Facelift |work=Mother Jones |location= San Francisco |author=Gilson, Dave |date=19 May 2010 |accessdate=17 June 2010}}

Domain name registration history

The domain names wikileaks.com, wikileaks.net, wikileaks.us, wikileaks.biz, and wikileaks.mobi previously had a "Registrant"{{cite web |url=http://whois.domaintools.com/wikileaks.com|title=WikiLeaks.com - WikiLeaks Information|publisher=DomainTools|accessdate=2010-12-01}} or "Registrant Organization"{{cite web |url=http://whois.domaintools.com/wikileaks.us|title=WikiLeaks.us - WikiLeaks Information|publisher=DomainTools|accessdate=2010-12-01}} listed as Jimmy Wales' company Wikia, and some had Michael Davis (who is Chief Operating Officer of Wikia),{{cite web |url=http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User:Mdavis|title=User:Mdavis|work=Wikia Community Central|publisher=Wikia|accessdate=2010-12-01}} listed for "Registrant Name". These sites showed content from wikileaks.org. This is perhaps the basis for some of the confusion regarding Wikipedia and WikiLeaks; however, Wikia and the Wikimedia Foundation are for the most part separate organizations.

In response to a question on his talk page on 8 December 2010, Wales stated:{{cite web |url=http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=401165971&oldid=401142171|title=Diff of past revision of User talk:Jimbo Wales|last=Wales|first=Jimbo|date=8 December 2010|work=Wikipedia|publisher=Wikimedia Foundation|accessdate=2010-12-16|authorlink=User:Jimbo Wales}}

:To answer your question, when Wikileaks first launched they put out a press release calling themselves something like "the Wikipedia of secrets". We had no idea who they were, whether it was a scam or spam or who knows what, so some domain names were registered defensively. We contacted them immediately to see what was going on and they apologized for being careless with the Wikipedia name and everything was sorted right away with no problems... except for them actually concluding the technical aspects of the transfer.

Further, according to a previous statement by Wales on 1 October 2010:{{cite web |url=http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikileaks_is_not_part_of_Wikipedia&diff=prev&oldid=388077595|title=Diff of past revision of Wikipedia:WikiLeaks is not part of Wikipedia|last=Wales|first=Jimbo|date=1 October 2010|work=Wikipedia|publisher=Wikimedia Foundation|accessdate=2010-12-01|authorlink=User:Jimbo Wales}}

:Wikia does not serve any of the sites. The CNAME records in DNS direct the traffic to www.wikileaks.org.

:The domain names were legally transferred to Wikileaks a long time ago, but for unknown reasons, Wikileaks never completed the technical aspects of the transfer. Wikia has made multiple requests to them to do so, with no result yet. Mr. Assange has indicated that he is very busy right now, which seems likely to be true, given recent news events.

On 27 January 2011, the domain name registrations were finally assigned to Julian Assange.{{cite news |url=http://domainnamewire.com/2011/01/29/julian-assange-now-owns-wikileaks-com/|title=Julian Assange Now Owns WikiLeaks.com|date=29 January 2011|work=Domain Name Wire|accessdate=2011-01-30}}

See also

References

{{Reflist}}

Further reading

External links

  • {{cite news |url=http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/12/09/what%E2%80%99s-in-a-name-in-the-case-of-%E2%80%98wiki%E2%80%99-lots-of-things/|title=What's in a name? In the case of 'wiki', lots of things.|date=9 December 2010|work=Wikimedia blog|publisher=Wikimedia Foundation|accessdate=2010-12-12|archiveurl=//web.archive.org/web/20101213234837/http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/12/09/what%E2%80%99s-in-a-name-in-the-case-of-%E2%80%98wiki%E2%80%99-lots-of-things/|archivedate=2010-12-13}}
  • {{cite news |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/wiki-giants-on-a-collision-course-over-shared-name-2065561.html|title=Wiki giants on a collision course over shared name|last1=Rawlinson|first1=Kevin |first2=Tom |last2=Peck|date=30 August 2010|work=The Independent|accessdate=2010-12-01}}
  • {{cite news |url=http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/09/28/2010-09-28_wikipedia_cofounder_jimmy_wales_slams_wikileaks_its_not_even_a_wiki.html|title=Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales slams WikiLeaks: It's not even a 'wiki'|last=Sheridan|first=Michael|date=28 September 2010|work=New York Daily News|accessdate=2010-12-01}}
  • {{cite news |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/andrew-clark-on-america/2010/aug/30/wikipedia-wikileaks|title=Not much love lost between Wikipedia and WikiLeaks|last=Clark|first=Andrew|date=30 August 2010|work=The Guardian|accessdate=2010-12-01}}

WikiLeaks is not part of Wikipedia

__NOTOC__