Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Assessment

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Navigation}}

Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject Baseball! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Baseball articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{tl|WikiProject Baseball}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of :Category:Baseball articles by quality and :Category:Baseball articles by importance. The quality and importance ratings serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist. ({{WP1|Baseball}})

Frequently asked questions

; How can I get my article rated? : As a member of the WikiProject Baseball, you can do it yourself. If you're unsure, list it in the requesting an assessment section below.

; Who can assess articles? : Any member of WikiProject Baseball is free to add—or change—the rating of an article, but please follow the guidelines.

; Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

; Where can I get more comments about my article? : Contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball who will handle it or assign the issue to someone. You may also list it for a Peer review.

; What if I don't agree with a rating? : Relist it as a request or contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball who will handle it or assign the issue to someone.

; Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department, or to contact the Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball directly.

Instructions

=Quality assessment=

{{Assessment Class Summary|banner=WikiProject Baseball|topic=Baseball}}

= Quality scale =

Note: A B-class article should have at least one reference.

{{Grading scheme

|Project = Baseball

|FA_example = Jackie Robinson

|A_example = N/A

|GA_example = Chris Young (pitcher)

|B_example = Fenway Park

|C_example = Home run

|Start_example = Reggie Baldwin

|Stub_example = Fair ball

|FL_example = List of Atlanta Braves team records

|List_example = List of National League Division Series broadcasters

|Book_cat = yes

|Book_example = Book:Major League Baseball awards

|Cat_cat = yes

|Cat_example = :Category:Baseball

|Dab_cat = yes

|Dab_example = Baseball (disambiguation)

|FM_cat = yes

|FM_example = :File:Babe Ruth2.jpg

|File_cat = yes

|File_example = :File:Bosb.png

|Portal_cat = yes

|Portal_example = Portal:Baseball

|Project_cat = yes

|Project_example = Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball

|Redirect_cat = yes

|Redirect_example = New York Giants (NL)

|Template_cat = yes

|Template_example = Template:Baseball

|NA_cat = yes

|NA_example = N/A

}}

=Importance assessment=

{{Assessment Importance Summary|banner=WikiProject Baseball|topic=Baseball}}

= Importance scale =

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of baseball. Importance does not equate to quality; a featured article could rate 'mid' on importance.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated. Rate international region/country-specific articles from the perspective of someone from that region.

{{Importance scheme

|topic = Baseball

|impn =

|Top_text = Subject is a "core" or "key" topic for Baseball, or is generally notable to people other than students of Baseball. They define and determine the subject of the Baseball WikiProject.

|Top_example = Baseball

|High_text = Subject is notable in a significant and important way within the field of Baseball, but not necessarily outside it.

|High_example = Sandy Koufax

|Mid_text = Subject contributes to the total subject of the Baseball WikiProject. Subject may not necessarily be famous.

|Mid_example = At bats per home run

|Low_text = Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within the field of Baseball, and may have been included primarily to achieve comprehensive coverage of another topic.

|Low_example = San Pedro de Macorís

|NA = yes

|NA_text =

|NA_example = :Category:Baseball

|Unknown = yes

|Unknown_text =

|Unknown_example= ???

}}

Statistics

=Current status=

{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Baseball articles by quality statistics}}

Requesting an assessment or reassessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead.

Add articles here! Newest requests on the BOTTOM

Assessment

Baseball