Wikipedia:WikiProject Cold War/Assessment
Welcome to the assessment department of the Cold War WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Cold War and related subjects. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{tl|WikiProject Cold War}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of :Category:Cold War articles by quality and :Category:Cold War articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
; How can I get my article rated? : Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
; Who can assess articles? : Any member of the Cold War WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
; What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
; Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
{{Assessment Class Summary
|banner = WikiProject Cold War
|topic = Cold War
}}
----
{{Assessment Importance Summary
|banner = WikiProject Cold War
|topic = Cold War
}}
= Quality scale =
{{grading scheme|Project=Cold War}}
= Importance scale =
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of the Cold War.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
{{Importance scheme
|topic=Cold War
|Top_example=Dissolution of the Soviet Union
|High_example=End of World War II in Europe
|Mid_example=Communist Party of China
|Low_example=Kitchen Debate
}}
= Requesting an assessment =
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
- South African Border War has been reworked and had all its referencing issues tweaked with the addition of new sources and the removal of unsourced information. Should be reassessed. --Katangais (talk) 22:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Assessment log
:The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Cold War articles by quality log}}
Worklist
:The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Cold War articles by quality}}