Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Assessment#Statistics

; How can I get my article rated? : Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

; Who can assess articles? : Any member of the Film WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.

; What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

; Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Assessment/Summary}}

In lieu of a moribund importance rating, the project has deprecated the importance parameter in favor of a targeted drive towards "core"-type articles as determined by consensus in external lists and polls rather than individual editorial whim. This work is concentrated at the Core department of this WikiProject.

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Assessment/Grading scheme}}

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. (Note that this is not required; any editor may assess or re-assess an article on their own, if acting in good faith.)

If you assess an article, please strike it off so that other editors will not waste time going there too. Comments are not mandatory and any should be left at the article's talk page; the list below will be wiped periodically.

If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please list it for peer review instead.

• DaVinci Resolve - Requesting re-assessment, following significant expansion compared to original article. User:IAmTheNeil
• Buenos Aires International Festival of Independent Cinema
• Mar del Plata International Film Festival
• Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (film) – assessment against B-class criteria. El Millo (talk) 06:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
• LuckyChap Entertainment I have added a considerable amount of information to this article, creating new sections and adding important detailed information, backed up with plenty of citations, so I don't think it should be rated as a stub class article anymore... Thanks! --Tasrockstar (talk) 01:13, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
• Answered at Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Assessment#2021. — Bilorv (talk) 23:36, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
• The Waiting City - Hello! I've added various new sections to this stub article and would love if someone could take a look at it to revise its assessment rating. When I first started editing, it was a Stub-class article but I believe it could now be classified under a new assessment rating. I have added new sections and included many citations throughout it as well. I would greatly appreciate any feedback on the article's talk page too. Thank you! Kaexkae (talk) 12:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
• Herostratus (film) The article is currently listed as a stub class article and the original article had very little information as the film is quite old. I have updated it with significantly more sources and information regarding the film's production, reception, and the themes. Any review or advice for improving it further would be appreciated, but as is I think it should be beyond a stub class article. DoingItForTheCredit (talk) 14:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
• The King (2017 American film) Hi there- my article has been rated as a 'C class' article but is currently under review for 'B Class' status. I was wondering if someone could please review it for me. Thank you so much! Husseyp (talk) 06:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
• Ghost Messenger has been edited a lot past two years and is ready for reassessment. Ppg409 (talk) 5:59, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

::{{re|User:Ppg409}} Hi, I reviewed your page and really enjoyed it! Unfortunately, I left it as a start class. You have a lot of detail, but it needs a little work to be a balanced page and meet wiki style.

• Oyster Farmer appears to be suitable for upgrading from a stub.Michaelwallace22 (talk) 00:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

::{{re|User:Michaelwallace22}} Certainty no longer a stub! I know this request is from years ago, but you did a lot of great work on this one. (The James Bond fact was fun!) I put it as C-class. I think the Themes and Plot sections could be even better with some edits and with the citations cleaned up! - SquawkGuard (talk) 07:11, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

• Roadrunner: A Film About Anthony Bourdain - I expanded the article a bit; it's currently ranked at Start-class, but I believe it could be C-class. Isi96 (talk) 04:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

:*{{re|Isi96}} I've left this at start-class because of the lack of sufficient summary and the massive coverage imbalance. It reads more like a "Controversy of Roadrunner" article but missing enough detail about the background of the film even for that focus. Kingsif (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• Shershaah, currently listed as Start Class. The article is a magnet for disruption and vandalism these days; I am listing it as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shershaah&oldid=1039304241 of this permalink] 2405:201:4013:80F1:8C80:A00F:E9B2:6937 (talk) 00:47, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
• Windsor International Film Festival - Currently out of date, and is severely needed of change. A major, impactful organization and event for the City of Windsor, Ontario, and within the film and film festival industry.
• I Not Stupid the current plot is outdated in format. There was a new format but was reverted due to poor grammar and copyediting, but a help is appreciated for the article. Please aim to keep the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I_Not_Stupid&diff=1057087579&oldid=1057086755 new format] as well as retaining the Good Article Class because it is correct and actual, but with a few cleanup. 122.11.214.200 (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
• Make It Funky (film) - I added this new article recently and supplied a class=Start value on the talk page. But I wonder if it might qualify for a higher assessment? ORES via Rater suggests B class, but I know better than to self-assign. Thank you. NOLA1982 (talk) 21:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
• Sher Mountain Killings Mystery- I have expanded this stub article by 2000 words for a university assignment. Would appreciate it if it could be reviewed. Thank you. JejuToSyd (talk) 18:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)JejuToSyd (talk) 09:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

::{{re|User:JejuToSyd}} You made a Stub a C-class! (And hopefully you got an A-in-class at your university) Fixing citations and edits for flow and balence would improve this page even more. - SquawkGuard (talk) 07:41, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

• Khartoum (film) currently rated as Start but more content has been added since it was last assessed. HerbertGP36 (talk) 17:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
• Kisapmata currently rated as C-class, has not yet been checked against criteria of B-Class. 08:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
• Vertigo currently rated as B-class but has seen a lot of changes since its last assessment. --Immacritic101 (talk) 22:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
• Adventure film has been expanded upon from [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adventure_film&oldid=1224774685 this], where it was tagged as requiring work since 2007 (!) to its current state. It was previously a start, and I would like a re-assessment. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• The Dead Girl's Feast - Newly created article on Brazilian Drama, translated from the Portuguese wiki. ChemicalBear (talk) 22:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

::{{re|User:ChemicalBear}} Hi ChemicalBear! It's great to see new film pages and this is a cool movie too! It is still a Start-Class, but it's a great beginning. You need to add more sources. (Published reviews from critics are great for this!) I did some style form edits on the page too, check 'em out and keep editing! — SquawkGuard (talk) 23:27, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

• If He Hollers, Let Him Go! (film) - I have greatly expanded it and added some sources. It does not have many sources, so I do not think other sections could be added but I do not think that it is still stub-class. Easternsahara (talk) 21:15, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

::{{re|User:Easternsahara}} I saw that Peer Review beat us to the page, but Congrats on the Start-Class! I hope you keep on improving it! Tarlby's peer review has some great advice. — SquawkGuard (talk) 03:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

{{Transcluded section|Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Film articles by quality statistics}}

{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Film articles by quality statistics}}

{{/Task forces}}

:The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Film articles by quality log

da:Kategori:Filmartikler efter kvalitet

Film