Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Assessment#Importance scale
Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Korea! This department focuses on assessing the quality and importance of Wikipedia's Korea-related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{tl|WikiProject Korea}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of :Category:Korea-related articles by quality and :Category:Korea-related articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
; How can I get my article rated? : Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
; Do the ratings matter? : Not really; most non-Wikipedians are unaware that they exist. Ratings are mostly tools for letting the WikiProject know which articles are in need of improvement.
; Who can assess articles? : Anybody. You can even assess your own articles; just try to be objective.
; Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases.
; What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department. Further information can also be found at the WikiProject Council's article assessment FAQ.
Instruction
{{See also|Template:WikiProject Korea}}
An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{tl|WikiProject Korea}} project banner on its talk page:
|class=
|importance=
}}
= Quality scale =
{{Grading scheme|Project = Korea-related|List_cat = yes
|FA_example = [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BTS&oldid=1105248386 BTS]
(as of August 2022)
|FL_example = [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_South_Korea&oldid=1141937937 List of World Heritage Sites in South Korea]
(as of March 2023)
|GA_example = [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sakhalin_Koreans&oldid=221125914 Sakhalin Koreans]
(as of June 2008)
|B_example = [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kisaeng&oldid=224113200 Kisaeng]
(as of July 2008)
|C_example = [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soju&oldid=224572865 Soju]
(as of July 2008)
|Start_example = [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Eun-ju&oldid=221446613 Lee Eun-ju]
(as of June 2008)
|Stub_example = [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chollima_%28website%29&oldid=225477439 Chollima (website)]
(as of July 2008)
|List_example = [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_monarchs_of_Korea&oldid=222810936 List of monarchs of Korea]
(as of July 2008)
}}
= Importance scale =
{{Importance scheme
|Project = Korea-related
|Top_text = Subject is a key entry point for Korea and is crucial for understanding Korea. A must-have for any good encyclopedia.
|High_text = Subject has a wide range of notability. Includes subjects with a high international profile, primary administrative divisions, keystone articles for major categories.
|Mid_text = Subject is notable within its particular field of study or place. Includes higher-profile individuals, most secondary administrative divisions, any category-main articles.
|Low_text = Subject is mainly of specialist interest, perhaps covering a small topic area. Includes lower-profile individuals, most tertiary administrative divisions.
|Top_example = Korean War, Kimchi, Seoul
|High_example = Ban Ki-moon, Daegu, Gwangju Uprising
|Mid_example = Samgyeopsal, Oh Se-hoon, .kr
|Low_example = Uiwang Station, OMG (single album), Yangcheon Heo clan
}}
Requesting an assessment
If you would like an outside opinion on a new quality rating for an article, please feel free to list it below.
Note: This is only to rate the article on quality (class and importance) - you will probably not get feedback on the article.
If you desire comments please use the peer review process.
If you assess an article, please remove it so others will not waste time reviewing the same article(s).
It is also helpful to leave a brief note on article's talk, under a heading "B-class review", stating why the article was failed (or that it was reviewed and passed).
Make sure to check the overview on how to assess a Biography article for details on how to assess. Thanks!
Articles submitted here will not be rated above 'B'; see Wikipedia:Good articles and Wikipedia:Featured articles for higher assessments.
Edit this section and place request here:
Current status
{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Korea-related articles by quality statistics}}
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Progress}}
Assessment log
:The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Korea-related articles by quality log