Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/March

{{sfp create}}

By sorting the main category, I found a few more tribes to split off:

• {{cl|Aerenicini stubs}} / {{tl|Aerenicini-stub}} ~ 150 P
• {{cl|Ancylonotini stubs}} / {{tl|Ancylonotini-stub}} > 150 P
• {{cl|Anisocerini stubs}} / {{tl|Anisocerini-stub}} > 90 P

Dawynn (talk) 05:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

:Speedy support {{cl|Lamiinae stubs}} is still too big, and this can't be disputed. Agreed. Gug01 (talk) 23:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose {{tl|Nyssodrysternum-stub}} and associated category to pull 60 articles from the overflowing {{cl|Acanthocinini stubs}}. Dawynn (talk) 04:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

:Speedy support Very helpful. Gug01 (talk) 23:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose a couple of large genus splits from here.

• {{cl|Ropica stubs}} / {{tl|Ropica-stub}}. 165 P.
• {{cl|Sybra stubs}} / {{tl|Sybra-stub}}. 245 P.

Dawynn (talk) 04:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose a couple tribe-level splits from this subfamily.

• {{cl|Callichromatini stubs}} / {{tl|Callichromatini-stub}} ~ 80 P
• {{cl|Piezocerini stubs}} / {{tl|Piezocerini-stub}} > 100 P

Dawynn (talk) 03:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Speedy proposal. To pick up the following:

• {{tl|Solomons-sport-stub}} - 45 P
• {{tl|Solomons-footy-bio-stub}} - 30 P
• {{tl|Solomons-sports-venue-stub}}
• {{tl|Solomons-athletics-bio-stub}}
• {{tl|Solomons-sport-bio-stub}}

(The last three have about 10 articles total amongst them)

Dawynn (talk) 10:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose creating more country-level music stubs. We have a few, but missing some large ones. The intent of any templates is to tag stub music genres or style articles that may be specific to one country. Where possible, more specific templates should be used. Note that the "musical group" categories are sometimes placed inside the "music biography" categories. I would argue that a group breaks the concept of individual biographies.

• {{cl|American music stubs}} / {{tl|US-music-stub}}. To pick up:
• {{cl|American music biography stubs}}, {{cl|United States musical group stubs}}, {{cl|United States record label stubs}}
• {{cl|Australian music stubs}} / {{tl|Australia-music-stub}}
• {{cl|Australian musician stubs‎‎}}, {{cl|Australian musical group stubs‎}}, {{cl|Australian record label stubs}}
• {{cl|British music stubs}} / {{tl|UK-music-stub}}. To pick up:
• {{cl|British music biography stubs}}. {{cl|United Kingdom musical group stubs}}, {{cl|United Kingdom record label stubs}}
• {{cl|French music stubs}} / {{tl|France-music-stub}}
• {{cl|French music biography stubs‎‎}}, {{cl|French musical group stubs‎}}, {{tl|France-record-label-stub‎}} (39 P)
• {{cl|German music stubs}} / {{tl|Germany-music-stub}}
• {{cl|German music biography stubs‎‎}}, {{cl|German musical group stubs‎}}, {{cl|German record label stubs‎}}
• {{cl|Italian music stubs}} / {{tl|Italy-music-stub}}
• {{cl|Italian music biography stubs‎‎}}, {{cl|Italian musical group stubs‎}}, {{tl|Italy-record-label-stub‎}} (15 P)
• {{cl|Polish music stubs}} / {{tl|Poland-music-stub}}
• {{cl|Polish music biography stubs‎‎}}, {{cl|Polish musical group stubs‎}}, {{tl|Poland-record-label-stub‎}} (4 P)
• {{cl|Spanish music stubs}} / {{tl|Spain-music-stub}}
• {{cl|Spanish music biography stubs‎‎}}, {{cl|Spanish musical group stubs‎}}, {{tl|Spain-record-label-stub‎}} (5 P)

Dawynn (talk) 03:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Both the stub and permanent category for the Lamiinae are poorly sorted. Propose the following exploratory stub templates. Since many of these permanent categories will be filled at the same time as the stub category, its difficult to judge which ones may be filled to capacity. Propose categories for all which pass 60 articles.

• {{tl|Agapanthiini-stub}} / {{cl|Agapanthiini stubs}}
• {{tl|Calliini-stub}} / {{cl|Calliini stubs}}
• {{tl|Crossotini-stub}} / {{cl|Crossotini stubs}}
• {{tl|Desmiphorini-stub}} / {{cl|Desmiphorini stubs}}
• {{tl|Hemilophini-stub}} / {{cl|Hemilophini stubs}}
• {{tl|Lamiini-stub}} / {{cl|Lamiini stubs}}
• {{tl|Mesosini-stub}} / {{cl|Mesosini stubs}}
• {{tl|Morimopsini-stub}} / {{cl|Morimopsini stubs}}
• {{tl|Onciderini-stub}} / {{cl|Onciderini stubs}}
• {{tl|Parmenini-stub}} / {{cl|Parmenini stubs}}
• {{tl|Phrissomini-stub}} / {{cl|Phrissomini stubs}}
• {{tl|Pteropliini-stub}} / {{cl|Pteropliini stubs}}
• {{tl|Saperdini-stub}} / {{cl|Saperdini stubs}}
• {{tl|Tragocephalini-stub}} / {{cl|Tragocephalini stubs}}

Dawynn (talk) 10:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support - probably the only way to go about with thi humungous category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

:Speedy support The {{cl|Lamiinae stubs}} is huge. Thus, I speedily support this. Gug01 (talk) 20:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

The ants of gotten out of hand. Propose the following:

• {{cl|Dolichoderinae stubs}} / {{tl|Dolichoderinae-stub}} > 300 P in addition to...
• {{cl|Dolichoderus stubs}} / {{tl|Dolichoderus-stub}} ~ 180 P
• {{cl|Dorymyrmex stubs}} / {{tl|Dorymyrmex-stub}} 61 P
• {{cl|Iridomyrmex stubs}} / {{tl|Iridomyrmex-stub}} ~ 85 P
• {{cl|Tapinoma stubs}} / {{tl|Tapinoma-stub}} ~ 75 P
• {{cl|Formicinae stubs}} / {{tl|Formicinae-stub}} > 250 P
• {{cl|Myrmeciinae stubs}} / {{tl|Myrmeciinae-stub}} ~ 125 P
• {{cl|Myrmicinae stubs}} / {{tl|Myrmicinae-stub}} > 500 P in addition to...
• {{cl|Cephalotes stubs}} / {{tl|Cephalotes-stub}} ~ 130 P
• {{cl|Crematogaster stubs}} / {{tl|Crematogaster-stub}} > 100 P
• {{cl|Ponerinae stubs}} / {{tl|Ponerinae-stub}} ~ 120 P

Dawynn (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

:Speedy support Makes sense. Also, there is seriously no {{cl|Formicinae stubs}}? Gug01 (talk) 23:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

::And if you think the stub category is out of hand, check {{cl|Lamiinae stubs}}! Gug01 (talk) 23:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

I propose creating {{cl|Iranian sports venue stubs}} - its stub tag, {{tl|Iran-sports-venue-stub}}, has [https://tools.wmflabs.org/templatecount/index.php?lang=en&name=Iran-sports-venue-stub&namespace=10#bottom 62 transclusions]. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:16, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

• Speedy support --Redrose64 (talk) 12:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp nocreate}}

I propose splitting :Category:New Zealand geography stubs by island:

• {{cl|North Island geography stubs}}/{{tl|NorthIsland-geo-stub}} - {{cl|Auckland Region geography stubs}}, {{cl|Bay of Plenty Region geography stubs‎}}, {{cl|Gisborne District geography stubs}}, {{cl|Hawke's Bay Region geography stubs}}, {{cl|Manawatu-Wanganui geography stubs}}, {{cl|Northland Region geography stubs}}, {{cl|Taranaki geography stubs}}, {{cl|Waikato geography stubs}}, {{cl|Wellington Region geography stubs}}
• {{cl|South Island geography stubs}}/{{tl|SouthIsland-geo-stub}} - {{cl|Canterbury, New Zealand geography stubs‎}}, {{cl|Marlborough Region geography stubs}}, {{cl|Nelson and Tasman District geography stubs}}, {{cl|Otago geography stubs}}, {{cl|Southland, New Zealand geography stubs}}, {{cl|West Coast, New Zealand geography stubs‎}}

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:43, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

:Weak support for cats, but oppose templates. Not really sure why you'd want to make templates. Container categories, fine, but as things stand there are only two stubs which would take a NorthIsland-geo-stub and none which would take a SouthIsland-geo-stub. You'd also run into problems with {{cl|Southland, New Zealand geography stubs}}, since Southland includes both part of the South Island and all of Stewart Island, NZ's third-largest island. Grutness...wha? 12:51, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

:I appreciate that this is stale, but nonetheless, oppose. This doesn't really feel necessary. All the regions have their own standalone subcats with 60+ articles, so what needs tidying up? It's only 16, not as if we're dealing with hundreds of them; all the results appear on one page. There is no other NZ stub cat that I can see which splits them into north/south island. Feels like a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 22:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

I propose creating bridge-struct-stub tags for any country which currently doesn't have one (e.g {{tl|Chile-bridge-struct-stub}}), upmerged to the continent-level bridge (structure) categories (create these where the category doesn't exist, if there are enough in the continent), as well as the national building and structure stub category and the transport(ation) stub category, if each one exists. While {{cl|Bridge (structure) stubs}} isn't oversized, some of the continent-level categories are, and where no such stub tag exists, these stubs have 3 stub tags on them. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Speedy proposal. To pick up:

• {{tl|FrenchPolynesia-bio-stub}} (32 P)
• {{tl|FrenchPolynesia-footy-bio-stub}} (36 P)
• {{tl|FrenchPolynesia-mayor-stub}} (1 P)

Dawynn (talk) 09:25, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support, assuming no significant overlap between usage of the first 2 tags. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 22:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Speedy request. To go with the other continental history categories. Will pick up:

• {{cl|Canadian history stubs}} (4 C, 219 P)
• {{cl|Mexican history stubs}} (114 P)
• {{cl|United States history stubs}} (4 C, 487 P)
• {{tl|Cuba-hist-stub}}
• {{tl|Haiti-hist-stub}}

Dawynn (talk) 18:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:Speedy support Helpful with the organization structure. Gug01 (talk) 19:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp top|withdrawn}}

Speedy request. The current {{cl|Saint Helena stubs}} is a properly supportable category. But it is overpopulated with extra templates. So leave {{tl|SaintHelena-stub}} and {{tl|SaintHelena-geo-stub}} in the Saint Helena category (with 85 pages total), but upmerge the current category to the SH, A & TdC category. Move these templates to the new category:

• {{tl|Ascension-geo-stub}} (4 P)
• {{tl|Ascension-stub}} (12 P)
• {{tl|TristandaCunha-geo-stub}} (4 P)
• {{tl|TristandaCunha-stub}} (20 P)

Dawynn (talk) 17:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:Closer investigation shows that {{tl|SaintHelena-stub}} and {{tl|SaintHelena-geo-stub}} can apply to the larger area. (This is also done with other areas, for instance Trinidad and Tobago tags simply state Trinidad, but can apply to both) Thus, I'm going to cancel this proposal and go through WP:CFD to rename the category. Dawynn (talk) 03:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Speedy request. To pick up the following:

• {{cl|Solomon Islands politician stubs}} - (39 P). Undersized on its own, but makes a solid contribution to the parent people category.
• {{tl|Solomons-athletics-bio-stub}} - (5 P)
• {{tl|Solomons-footy-bio-stub}} - (22 P)
• {{tl|Solomons-bio-stub}} - (10 P)
• {{tl|Solomons-sport-bio-stub}} - (1 P)

Dawynn (talk) 04:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Speedy request. To pick up the following:

• {{tl|Macau-bio-stub}} (53 P)
• {{tl|Macau-sport-bio-stub}} (9 P)
• {{tl|Macau-athletics-bio-stub}} (1 P)
• {{tl|Macau-footy-bio-stub}} (26 P)

Dawynn (talk) 03:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:Speedy support Gug01 (talk) 13:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Speedy request. To pick up {{tl|Réunion-bio-stub}} (84 P). Dawynn (talk) 02:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Speedy proposal. We already have a full {{cl|Equatoguinean sportspeople stubs}}. This is a natural parent category. Will also pick up:

• {{tl|EquatorialGuinea-bio-stub}} (13 P)
• {{tl|EquatorialGuinea-politician-stub}} (17 P)

Dawynn (talk) 01:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support Helpful with the organization. Gug01 (talk) 19:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

I propose creating {{cl|Northern Territory stubs}}/{{tl|NorthernTerritory-stub}} - this should pick up {{cl|Northern Territory geography stubs}} (189 stubs), as well as all of the pages listed here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support Over 60 stubs in stub category, helps with organization. Gug01 (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Speedy proposal: {{tlx|NewZealand-railstation-stub}} with {{cl|New Zealand railway station stubs}} to pick up all 73 of the articles remaining in {{cl|Oceanian railway station stubs}} (all of which are NZ) plus 40 or so in {{cl|New Zealand rail transport stubs}}. Category will be sub to those two plus {{cl|New Zealand building and structure stubs}} and {{cl|Railway stations in New Zealand}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:25, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support assuming the accuracy of the proposal. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support Logical. Gug01 (talk) 20:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

I propose creating {{cl|South Australia building and structure stubs}}/{{tl|SouthAustralia-struct-stub}} - this should pick up at least the [https://tools.wmflabs.org/templatecount/index.php?lang=en&name=SouthAustralia-school-stub&namespace=10#bottom 37] {{tl|SouthAustralia-school-stub}}s and the [http://tools.wmflabs.org/quick-intersection/index.php?lang=en&project=wikipedia&cats=Railway+stations+in+Australia%0D%0AAll+stub+articles&ns=0&depth=-1&max=30000&start=0&format=html&redirects=&callback= 35] {{tl|SouthAustralia-railstation-stub}}s (proposed below). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

I propose the following:

• {{tl|Australia-railstation-stub}}/{{cl|Australia railway station stubs}} - [http://tools.wmflabs.org/quick-intersection/index.php?lang=en&project=wikipedia&cats=Railway+stations+in+Australia%0D%0AAll+stub+articles&ns=0&depth=-1&max=30000&start=0&format=html&redirects=&callback= 447 stubs], including:
• {{tl|NewSouthWales-railstation-stub}}/{{cl|New South Wales railway station stubs}} - [http://tools.wmflabs.org/quick-intersection/index.php?lang=en&project=wikipedia&cats=Railway+stations+in+New+South+Wales%0D%0AAll+stub+articles&ns=0&depth=-1&max=30000&start=0&format=html&redirects=&callback= 105 stubs]
• {{tl|Queensland-railstation-stub}} (upmerged) - [http://tools.wmflabs.org/quick-intersection/index.php?lang=en&project=wikipedia&cats=Railway+stations+in+Queensland%0D%0AAll+stub+articles&ns=0&depth=-1&max=30000&start=0&format=html&redirects=&callback= 12 stubs]
• {{tl|SouthAustralia-railstation-stub}} (upmerged) - [http://tools.wmflabs.org/quick-intersection/index.php?lang=en&project=wikipedia&cats=Railway+stations+in+South+Australia%0D%0AAll+stub+articles&ns=0&depth=-1&max=30000&start=0&format=html&redirects=&callback= 35 stubs]
• {{tl|Victoria-railstation-stub}}{{tl|VictoriaAU-railstation-stub}}/{{cl|Victoria (Australia) railway station stubs}} - [http://tools.wmflabs.org/quick-intersection/index.php?lang=en&project=wikipedia&cats=Railway+stations+in+Victoria+(Australia)%0D%0AAll+stub+articles&ns=0&depth=-1&max=30000&start=0&format=html&redirects=&callback= 274 stubs]
• {{tl|WesternAustralia-railstation-stub}} (upmerged) - [http://tools.wmflabs.org/quick-intersection/index.php?lang=en&project=wikipedia&cats=Railway+stations+in+Western+Australia%0D%0AAll+stub+articles&ns=0&depth=-1&max=30000&start=0&format=html&redirects=&callback= 18 stubs]

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

• Speedy support for NSW and Vic. I should suggest that {{tlx|VictoriaAU-railstation-stub}} would be a better name because of ambiguity - we already have {{tlx|VictoriaAU-rail-transport-stub}}, not to mention {{tlx|VictoriaAU-stub}} (also {{tlx|VictoriaAU-gov-stub}} {{tlx|VictoriaAU-school-stub}} {{tlx|VictoriaAU-geo-stub}} {{tlx|VictoriaCountyTX-geo-stub}} {{tlx|VictoriaLand-geo-stub}} {{tlx|VictoriaNS-geo-stub}}. Support for all the other templates - presumably {{tlx|Australia-railstation-stub}} is to catch the stations in ACT, NT, Tasmania. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
• :Noted comment about Victoria. And the Australia-level tag is both to catch the few regions without enough railway station stubs to justify a tag, and for the use of other editors who may crete/sort Australia railway station stubs and not want to take the time to check which part of Australia it's in. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
• ::Er, you struck {{tl|Victoria-railstation-stub}} and replaced it with... {{tl|Victoria-railstation-stub}} (no difference). --Redrose64 (talk) 20:22, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

I propose {{cl|Queensland building and structure stubs}}/{{tl|Queensland-struct-stub}} - this should at least pick up {{cl|Queensland airport stubs}} and {{cl|Queensland school stubs}}, each of which having more than 60 stubs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support Gug01 (talk) 19:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

New family proposals to help split up the oversized {{cl|Spider stubs}}:

• {{cl|Agelenidae stubs}} / {{tl|Agelenidae-stub}} - 90 P
• {{cl|Linyphiidae stubs}} / {{tl|Linyphiidae-stub}} - 491 P
• {{cl|Zodariidae stubs}} / {{tl|Zodariidae-stub}} - 114 P

Dawynn (talk) 10:18, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support Seems obvious, just helps. I don't see how anyone can oppose, so if no one else comments I'll close the review tomorrow. Gug01 (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Speedy request. To pick up {{tl|Deltaproteobacteria-stub}} which has now reached 60 articles. Dawynn (talk) 11:59, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support. I'll close it since its a speedy request. Gug01 (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Adding these handful of templates will provide a -politician-stub template for all recognized countries and dependencies with more than 50,000 people:

• {{tl|Réunion-politician-stub}} ~ 30 P
• {{tl|Macau-politician-stub}} ~ 40 P
• {{tl|FrenchPolynesia-politician-stub}} ~ 15 P
• {{tl|Curaçao-politician-stub}} ~ 10 P
• {{tl|Jersey-politician-stub}} ~ 55 P
• {{tl|Guernsey-politician-stub}} ~ 15 P

Dawynn (talk) 12:33, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support Seems like a good template network here. Gug01 (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose the following sport templates. This will provide -sport-stub templates for all recognized countries and dependencies with a population > 150,000 people:

• {{tl|Guadeloupe-sport-stub}} / {{cl|Guadeloupean sport stubs}} ~ 80 P
• {{tl|Martinique-sport-stub}} / {{cl|Martiniquais sport stubs}} ~ 95 P
• {{tl|NewCaledonia-sport-stub}} / {{cl|New Caledonian sport stubs}} ~ 80 P
• {{tl|FrenchPolynesia-sport-stub}} / {{cl|French Polynesian sport stubs}} ~ 85 P
• {{tl|FrenchGuiana-sport-stub}} ~ 40 P

Dawynn (talk) 12:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:Speedy support Agree. Makes sense for all templates. Gug01 (talk) 19:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose the following templates. This will provide -struct-stub templates for all countries and dependencies with more than 275,000 people:

• {{tl|PapuaNewGuinea-struct-stub}} / {{cl|Papua New Guinean building and structure stubs}} ~ 110 P
• {{tl|PuertoRico-struct-stub}} / {{cl|Puerto Rican building and structure stubs}} ~ 260 P
• {{tl|Jamaica-struct-stub}} / {{cl|Jamaican building and structure stubs}} ~ 190 P
• {{tl|Trinidad-struct-stub}} ~ 30 P
• {{tl|EastTimor-struct-stub}} ~ 25 P
• {{tl|Réunion-struct-stub}} ~ 8 P
• {{tl|Solomons-struct-stub}} ~ 30 P
• {{tl|Guadeloupe-struct-stub}} ~ 10 P
• {{tl|Martinique-struct-stub}} ~ 5 P
• {{tl|Bahamas-struct-stub}} / {{cl|Bahamian building and structure stubs}} ~ 80 P

Dawynn (talk) 12:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:I'd support this, but I don't think there is need for {{tl|Martinique-struct-stub}} because it has only 5 pages. Gug01 (talk) 23:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

::Yeah, I'm thinking Martinique, Réunion, and Guadeloupe can wait for now. Dawynn (talk) 01:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose the following absent templates. This provides -bio-stub templates for all recognized countries and dependencies with more than 10,000 people:

• {{tl|Guadeloupe-bio-stub}} / {{cl|Guadeloupean people stubs}} ~ 200 P
• {{tl|Mayotte-bio-stub}} ~ 20 P
• {{tl|IsleofMan-bio-stub}} / {{cl|Manx people stubs}} ~ 470 P
• {{tl|Caymans-bio-stub}} / {{cl|Caymanian people stubs}} ~ 90 P
• {{tl|SintMaarten-bio-stub}}
• {{tl|SaintMartin-bio-stub}}
• {{tl|Åland-bio-stub}} ~ 45 P
• {{tl|CaribbeanNetherlands-bio-stub}} ~ 13 P
• {{tl|Anguilla-bio-stub}} / {{cl|Anguillan people stubs}} ~ 90 P

Dawynn (talk) 12:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:Could you please say how many stubs articles would go in the stub categories? Gug01 (talk) 20:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

::Thanks for that. Helped me see where categories will fill in quickly. I cancelled the Sint Maarten / Saint Martin request because catscan only showed 11 articles between the two. Dawynn (talk) 22:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

:OK. I'll close the debate now. Gug01 (talk) 23:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Even though we have an overpopulated {{cl|Svalbard geography stubs}}, there is no parent category to put this in. Propose template {{tl|Svalbard-stub}} and category {{cl|Svalbard stubs}}. The category will pick up the aforementioned geography category as well as existing template {{tl|Svalbard-church-stub}}. Add in new templates {{tl|Svalbard-bio-stub}} and {{tl|Svalbard-struct-stub}} to round things out. Dawynn (talk) 12:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Hi folks - long time no see. Proposing an upmerged {{tl|NewZealand-photographer-stub}} to feed into {{cl|Photographer stubs}} and {{cl|New Zealand artist stubs}}. Speediable S2. Currently looks like about 25-35 articles which could take this template. Grutness...wha? 00:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:There were 39. Grutness...wha?

Similar speediable templates for {{tl|Canada-photographer-stub}} and {{tl|Australia-photographer-stub}} look useful. Grutness...wha? 00:35, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Support Go ahead. Gug01 (talk) 20:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

A bunch of other templates that are ready for categories. Propose speedy approval:

• {{cl|Red dwarf star stubs}} / {{tl|Reddwarf-star-stub}} - 71 transclusions
• {{cl|1950s play stubs}} / {{tl|1950s-play-stub}} - 61 transclusions
• {{cl|2010s play stubs}} / {{tl|2010s-play-stub}} - 60 transclusions
• {{cl|American journalist, 1910s birth stubs}} / {{tl|US-journalist-1910s-stub}} - 63 transclusions
• {{cl|1980s hip hop album stubs}} / {{tl|1980s-hiphop-album-stub}} - 73 transclusions
• {{cl|Burma university stubs}} / {{tl|Burma-university-stub}} - 69 transclusions
• {{cl|2010s hip hop single stubs}} / {{tl|2010s-hiphop-single-stub}} - 157 transclusions
• {{cl|English cricket biography, 1990s births stubs}} / {{tl|England-cricket-bio-1990s-stub}} - 60 transclusions
• {{cl|Sint Maarten stubs}} / {{tl|SintMaarten-stub}} - 63 transclusions

Dawynn (talk) 13:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

:I presume {{cl|Red dwarf star stubs}}, not {{cl|Red dwarf start stubs}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:29, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

::Thanks for that. Corrected. Dawynn (talk) 22:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose the following new geography splits for which I could find no prior proposal. As all of these have passed the 60 mark, proposing speedy approval:

• {{cl|Bueng Kan Province geography stubs}} / {{tl|BuengKan-geo-stub}} - 60 transclusions
• {{cl|Gilgit–Baltistan geography stubs}} / {{tl|GilgitBaltistan-geo-stub}} - 66 transclusions
• {{cl|Kadapa district geography stubs}} / {{tl|Kadapa-geo-stub}} - 63 transclusions
• {{cl|Karimnagar district geography stubs}} / {{tl|Karimnagar-geo-stub}} - 75 transclusions
• {{cl|Ljubljana geography stubs}} / {{tl|Ljubljana-geo-stub}} - 61 transclusions
• {{cl|Pasco Region geography stubs}} / {{tl|Pasco-geo-stub}} - 60 transclusions
• {{cl|Visakhapatnam district geography stubs}} / {{tl|Visakhapatnam-geo-stub}} - 82 transclusions
• {{cl|West Godavari district geography stubs}} / {{tl|WestGodavari-geo-stub}} - 60 transclusions

Dawynn (talk) 12:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose the following new speedy splits:

• {{cl|Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Registered Historic Place stubs}} / {{tl|MecklenburgCountyNC-NRHP-stub}} - 98 transclusions
• {{cl|Guilford County, North Carolina Registered Historic Place stubs}} / {{tl|GuilfordCountyNC-NRHP-stub}} - 92 transclusions

Dawynn (talk) 10:41, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose the following new speedy splits.

• {{cl|Musotiminae stubs}} / {{tl|Musotiminae-stub}} - 184 transclusions
• {{cl|Evergestinae stubs}} / {{tl|Evergestinae-stub}} - 120 transclusions
• {{cl|Schoenobiinae stubs}} / {{tl|Schoenobiinae-stub}} - 267 transclusions
• {{cl|Bagridae stubs}} / {{tl|Bagridae-stub}} - 63 transclusions
• {{cl|Clostridia stubs}} / {{tl|Clostridia-stub}} - 128 transclusions

Dawynn (talk) 10:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support Support the taxonomy splits. Gug01 (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

::I'll close the review by tomorrow if nobody else comments. Gug01 (talk) 22:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp nocreate}}

I propose that the {{cl|Haliplidae stubs}} is created. It will contain 20 articles (nearly all the articles in the {{cl|Haliplidae}}). Gug01 (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

:Oppose. There is already an upmerged template for this family. As noted, the template has not been adequately filled (please see guidelines above), and the parent ({{cl|Adephaga stubs}}) does not need splitting at this time. Even the parent contains less than 100 articles - a fair, but small size for a stub category. Dawynn (talk) 09:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose a category for {{tl|Staphylinidae-stub}}. Should contain more than 30 articles. Makes sense since I'm planning to create some more. Gug01 (talk) 21:19, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

:Support under modified name. The tag is used on 77 articles, so I approve making a category, but please name it {{cl|Staphylinidae stubs}}, instead. This will align the stub category with the permanent category ({{cl|Staphylinidae}}). Dawynn (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

::Sure. Agreed. I'll make the category. Gug01 (talk) 22:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose an exploratory template and potential category.

• {{cl|Women's golf tournament stubs}} / {{tl|womens-golf-tournament-stub}}

Dawynn (talk) 12:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

::How about a split by country? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:08, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

::I could go for that. To begin with, how about building a couple of exploratory templates, with categories, if enough articles exist.

::* {{tl|US-golf-tournament-stub}} / {{cl|American golf tournament stubs}}

::* {{tl|UK-golf-tournament-stub}} / {{cl|British golf tournament stubs}}

::Dawynn (talk) 09:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Split out the two largest tribes:

• {{tl|Erionotini-stub}} / {{cl|Erionotini stubs}}‎ (> 350 P)
• {{tl|Hesperiini-stub}} / {{cl|Hesperiini stubs}}‎ (> 90 P)

Dawynn (talk) 12:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

:Agreed. Very necessary. Please do it quick before the category reaches above 900. Gug01 (talk) 21:15, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

{{sfp create}}

Propose splitting by subfamily. Build permanent categories while building stub categories. Build templates first, categories if more than 60 articles.

• {{tl|Dexiinae-stub}} / {{cl|Dexiinae stubs}}. Main article: Dexiinae
• {{tl|Exoristinae-stub}} / {{cl|Exoristinae stubs}}. Main article: Exoristinae
• {{tl|Phasiinae-stub}} / {{cl|Phasiinae stubs}}. Main article: Phasiinae
• {{tl|Tachininae-stub}} / {{cl|Tachininae stubs}}. Main article: Tachininae

Dawynn (talk) 12:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

:Yes. Go ahead. Gug01 (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

{{sfp bottom}}

Proposals 2015 03