Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Assessment#Quality and importance tables

Welcome to the assessment department of the United States WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about the United States or the people of the United States. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{tl|WikiProject United States}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed into the appropriate sub-categories of :Category:United States articles by quality and :Category:United States articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

: See also the general assessment FAQ

; 1. What is the purpose of the article ratings? : The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.

; 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? : Just add {{tl|WikiProject United States}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.

; 3. Someone put a {{tl|WikiProject United States}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? : Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the project talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article).

; 4. Who can assess articles? : Any member of WikiProject United States is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.

; 5. How do I rate an article? : Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.

; 6. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

; 7. What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.

; 8. Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

; 9. What if I have a question not listed here? : If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Instructions

= Quality assessment =

{{Assessment Class Summary|banner=WikiProject United States|topic=United States}}

== Quality scale ==

{{Grading scheme

|Project = United States

|FA_example = Statue of Liberty

|A_example = 24th Infantry Division (United States)

|GA_example = South Dakota

|B_example = New York City

|C_example = Civil rights movement

|Start_example = AFL–CIO

|Stub_example = Flora of the United States

|FL_example = List of United States cities by population

|List_example = List of capitals in the United States

|Book_cat = yes

|Book_example = Book:Political divisions of the United States

|Cat_cat = yes

|Cat_example = :Category:United States

|Dab_cat = yes

|Dab_example = New Amsterdam (disambiguation)

|FM_cat = yes

|FM_example = :File:American World War II senior military officials, 1945.JPEG

|File_cat = yes

|File_example = :File:Flag of the United States.svg

|Portal_cat = yes

|Portal_example = Portal:United States

|Project_cat = yes

|Project_example = Wikipedia:WikiProject United States

|Redirect_cat = yes

|Redirect_example = List of United States submarine classes

|Template_cat = yes

|Template_example = Template:United States topics

|NA_cat = yes

|NA_example = User:BrendelSignature/Income inequality in the United States

}}

= Importance assessment =

{{Assessment Importance Summary|banner=WikiProject United States|topic=United States}}

== Importance scale ==

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of the United States.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

{{Importance scheme

|topic = United States

|Top_example = United States, New York City, Washington, D.C.

|High_example = Austin, Texas

|Mid_example = Fat Man, Federal Communications Commission

|Low_example = 509th Tactical Fighter Squadron

|NA = yes

|NA_example = Template:United States topics

|Unknown = yes

}}