Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Louisiana State University/Introduction to Information and Society (Fall 2017)

{{start of course week|2017-08-21}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Introduction to the Wikipedia project}}

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

• [http://wikiedu.org/editingwikipedia Editing Wikipedia] pages 1–5
• [http://wikiedu.org/evaluatingwikipedia Evaluating Wikipedia]

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-08-28}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia}}

•  Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. 
•  It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade. 
•  When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page. 

{{assignment milestones|Everyone has a Wikipedia account}}

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-09-04}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Discussion: What's a content gap?}}

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

• Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
• What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
• Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
• What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-09-11}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia}}

• Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
• Create a section in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MyPage/sandbox your sandbox] titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings. 
• Read the Wikipedia article about the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_divide Digital Divide] and the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_divide_in_Canada Digital Divide in Canada] to learn how your article might look when you complete your final assignment. 
• As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these): 
• Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
• Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
• Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
•  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? 
• Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
•  Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? 
• How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
• How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
• Post a summary of your answers to your "Article evaluation" section in your sandbox.

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-09-18}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Add to an article}}

• Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
•  The [https://tools.wmflabs.org/citationhunt/en Citation Hunt] tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement. 
• You will receive technical feedback on your use of Wikipedia after this week.

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-09-25}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Discussion: Thinking about sources and plagiarism}}

• Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
• What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
• What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
• What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?

{{assignment|Assignment - Best practices for working in groups}}

• Everyone in the course has been assigned a topic. Please review the Students tab above to see who else has been assigned your topic. This is your group.  
• Make sure everyone in the group is assigned to the same Wikipedia article on the Students tab of this course page. 
• Your group will have a discussion forum you can use in Moodle that only your group members and the instructor can see. Introduce yourself to your group members.
• Every group will be creating a new article stem for their assigned article. Each group member will create a section, and the group will collaborate to create the lead.
• Select one group member whose Sandbox space you'll all share to draft your article. Each person should link to that shared Sandbox from their own Sandbox page. A sandbox is like any other page on Wikipedia, and anyone can edit it. 
•  Wikipedia doesn't allow multiple people to edit from different devices at the same time. If you're working together in person, one person should add the work to the Sandbox. If you are all working independently, make small edits and save often to avoid "editing conflicts" with classmates. Make sure that you're logged in under your own Wikipedia account while editing in your classmate's sandbox to ensure your edits are recorded. 
•  Don't create a group account for your project. Group accounts are prohibited. 

{{assignment|Assignment - Review your topic & find your sources}}

• Review page 6 of your [http://wikiedu.org/editingwikipedia Editing Wikipedia] guidebook.
• In [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MyPage/sandbox your group sandbox], write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article. 
• Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add to your groups article? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page. Decide what sections you want to draft for your article and pick one group member to draft each one. 
• Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography. 

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-10-02}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Draft your article}}

•  Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MyPage/sandbox your sandbox]. 
•  A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_Lovelace Ada Lovelace]. See [http://wikiedu.org/editingwikipedia Editing Wikipedia] page 9 for more ideas. 

{{assignment milestones|Everyone has started writing}}

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-10-09}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Discussion: Thinking about Wikipedia}}

• What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
• What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
• On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
• If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?

{{assignment|Assignment - Expand your draft}}

• Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
• If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MyPage/sandbox your sandbox] to request notes.

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-10-16}}

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-10-23}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Peer review and copy edit}}

• First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
•  You are assigned a fellow group's article to peer review and copy edit. On the Articles tab, find the article that you are assigned to review.
• Find the link to your assigned peer review article on Moodle.
•  Peer review your classmates' draft. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article that your fellow students are working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians. 
•  As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic? 

{{assignment milestones|Peer reviews are complete}}

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-10-30}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Respond to your peer review}}

• Read [http://wikiedu.org/editingwikipedia Editing Wikipedia] pages 12 and 14.
• Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions. 
• Post a summary of how your group addressed the peer review comments on your group sandbox's talk page.

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-11-06}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia}}

• Read [http://wikiedu.org/editingwikipedia Editing Wikipedia] page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
• You can also review the Sandboxes and Mainspace online training.

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-11-13}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Continue improving your article}}

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

• Read [http://wikiedu.org/editingwikipedia Editing Wikipedia] page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
• Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take the 'Contributing Images and Media Files' training before you upload an image.

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-11-20}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Polish your work}}

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Content Expert at any time if you need further help!

{{end of course week}}

{{start of course week|2017-11-27}}

{{assignment|Assignment - Final article}}

It's the final week to develop your article.

• Read [http://wikiedu.org/editingwikipedia Editing Wikipedia] page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
• Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Content Expert at any time!

{{assignment|Assignment - Reflective essay}}

• Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article? 
• Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. 
• Peer Review: What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article? 
• Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback? 
• Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important? 

{{assignment milestones|All article edits are complete}}

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.

{{end of course week}}