Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-06-07/News and notes

According to a [http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/198354 post] by William Pietri, project manager for the Flagged Revisions Deployment Project, the flaggedrevs extension will be deployed on the English Wikipedia on June 14.

Unlike other projects such as the German Wikipedia (where the extension has been live since 2008), the English Wikipedia will make use of only the "flagged protection" feature, which has been renamed "pending changes" following extensive discussion on the mailing list Foundation-l and the terminology subpage. It allows administrators to apply a new kind of protection to a page, under which it can still be edited by every user, but the change will not be visible (in the default view) to unregistered users unless it has been made or confirmed by a trusted user.

{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Series/Pending changes}}

The feature will be activated only for a trial, which is expected to last two months and will be limited to a maximum of 2,000 pages. The trial is likely to generate considerable media attention, given the fact that its mere announcement last August has already received coverage (see Signpost story).

A new help page, with which Pietri has requested assistance, is here. Some diagrams explaining the terminology are here. The feature can be tested out before deployment on the [http://flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page flaggedrevs test wiki].

There was some debate in a recent RfC on whether or not the trial configuration should involve the separate "Reviewers" user rights group or use the existing "Autoconfirmed" group as the trusted users group. Some technical details of the deployment are [http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/wikitech/198480 still being hammered out].

The following table summarizes permissions under current settings for the trial (more details here):

See also the Signpost's backgrounder on the history of the extension (An extended look at how we got to flagged protection and patrolled revisions, August 2009) and other Signpost coverage dating back to 2006.

The Wikimedia Foundation has hired two new employees: Zack Exley will be Wikimedia's new Chief Community Officer, and Barry Newstead will be the Chief Global Development Officer. According to an FAQ about the positions Exley will be in charge of programs, including Fundraising, Reader relations, Public outreach, and volunteer coordination; Newstead will be in charge of Communications and Business Development.

Zack Exley has worked in high-profile positions organizing fundraising and volunteer activities for MoveOn.org, the 2004 U.S. presidential campaign of John Kerry, and the UK Labour Party's 2005 election campaign. In recent years he has advised other organizations on similar issues, including the ACLU, Amnesty International, the NAACP, the International Rescue Committee and Greenpeace USA. He also ran the parody website gwbush.com.

Barry Newstead is currently a partner at the strategy consultancy firm The Bridgespan Group, where he has been leading the team assisting the Foundation in the Strategic Planning process since last year. Newstead has written a [http://hbr.org/search/Barry%20Newstead series of blog postings] about the process on the web site of the Harvard Business Review. In [http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2009/10/putting_the_open_in_wikimedias.html one] of his first postings, Newstead expressed concern that the inner Wikipedia community might not be "open to more radical strategic options that might advance the vision", citing the "near-taboo" of advertising as one possible example. However, in a [http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2010/03/from_haiti_to_the_oscars_wikim.html later posting], Newstead offered huge praise for the contributions of Wikipedia volunteers to the strategy process.

Originally, the Foundation had set out to hire a Chief Development Officer, responsible for fundraising (a common position in non-profits) and a Chief Global Program Officer (responsible for relations with Wikipedians and readers). According to a Q&A and a separate [http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/198193 announcement] to the community by the Foundation's executive director Sue Gardner, the CDO role was expanded to that of a Chief Community Officer, at the suggestion of Exley, who argued that donors should be regarded as part of the same community as editors and readers, instead of being treated separately.

According to Gardner, filling these positions is the result of a search process of "many months", and "completes the C-level hiring, with the exception of the Chief Human Resources Officer", which is expected to be announced within six weeks. (The other two C-level posts are the Chief Financial and Operating Officer, filled by Véronique Kessler since 2008, and the Chief Technical Officer, for which Danese Cooper was hired earlier this year – see Signpost coverage – following the departure of Brion Vibber.)

File:An Van Camp with Dürer block.jpg

File:Decorated battleaxe.JPG battle-axe head on display in the British Museum, photographed during the Backstage Pass tour]]Last week, User:Witty lama (Liam Wyatt) began his five-week stay at the British Museum as volunteer Wikipedian in Residence (see earlier Signpost coverage). Representing the largest ever wikimeetup in the UK, 40 Wikimedians joined him last Friday for a [http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Backstage_Pass Backstage Pass] event, consisting of private tours of some of the museum's public and non-public areas, followed by discussions and on-wiki collaboration with the staff (cf. Signpost coverage of the announcement).

In an article titled [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/05/arts/design/05wiki.html Venerable British Museum Enlists in the Wikipedia Revolution], The New York Times covered the event at length, explaining that the British Museum's motivation to collaborate with Wikipedia is "to help ensure that the museum’s expertise and notable artifacts are reflected in that digital reference’s pages". The article noted that museums and Wikipedia have as their common interest "educating the public: one has the artifacts and expertise, and the other has the online audience", but also mentioned possible conflicts, recalling the legal threats issued last year by the National Portrait Gallery, but [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-June/058731.html not subsequently pursued], against a Commons user who had uploaded high-resolution scans of public domain images from the Gallery's collection (see Signpost coverage). Regarding the Wikimedia side, the NYT quoted Wyatt's objection to what he saw as free culture "extremism": "‘Content liberation’ is the phrase that has been used within the Wikimedia community, and I hate that: they see them as a repository of images that haven’t been nicked yet." (The term "content liberation" has been used in the past by German Wikipedian Mathias Schindler, now project manager at Wikimedia Germany, who had negotiated large scale image donations from Bundesarchiv and Deutsche Fotothek.)

Among the results of the tour are photos and [http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Backstage_Pass#Results_of_the_day new articles] (including several DYK nominations) about the British Museum's artefacts. Unknown to Wyatt, one participant also started the article Wikipedian in Residence.

The Signpost is delighted to report the announcement of the British Museum's Featured Article Prize: five prizes of £100 (≈$140/€120) at their [http://www.britishmuseumshoponline.org/ shop/bookshop] for new Featured Articles on topics related to the British Museum in any Wikipedia language edition. Ideally, the topics will be articles about collection items.

The rollout of the new user interface on May 13 brought some controversial changes, among them the relocation of the search box, some of the modifications to the Wikipedia logo (see Signpost coverage) and making Wikipedia inaccessible for some rare browsers (on [http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/wikitech/196399 Blackberry and PS3]). The controversy about another change culminated only recently, raising fundamental questions about the relationship between volunteer and paid developers, or more generally the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia foundation.

In the default view of the new user interface, the interlanguage links to articles about the same topic in other Wikipedia language versions are hidden behind a link titled "Languages" (using the "[http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/UsabilityInitiative/Vector/Modules/CollapsibleNav/ CollapsibleNav]" JavaScript module). Once a user clicks on the link, the whole list will be displayed (as in the old interface), until the end of the browser session.

Many users objected to this, and [https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23497 Bug 23497] was filed. On June 3, a volunteer developer made the requested change and restored the old behavior, only to be [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/67299 reverted] by a developer from the usability experience (UX) team which had developed the new user interface in a 16-month effort:

:"This goes against an intentional design decision. To discuss that decision further and submit proposals to change this design please contact Howie Fung or visit http://usability.wikimedia.org"

Howie Fung later [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-June/058936.html explained] the background of the team's decision as follows:

:"... we measured the click behavior for two groups of English Wikipedia users, Monobook and Vector (Vector users are primarily those who participated in the beta). Of Monobook and Vector users, 0.95% and 0.28% clicked on the language links (out of 126,180 and 180,873 total clicks), respectively. We felt that fewer than 1% of Monobook clicks was a reasonable threshold for hiding the Language links, especially when taken in the context of the above design principle [that one should avoid the sheer number of language links making users "numb" to the list] and the implementation (state persists after expanding)."

[http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/engine?do=post_view_flat;post=198093;page=1;mh=-1;list=wiki;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC On the Foundation-l mailing list] and on the usability wiki, numerous users still questioned the decision. Sue Gardner [http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/198541 defended] the usability team, arguing that "[t]he folks here on foundation-l are not representative of readers."

Erik Möller, Deputy director of the Wikimedia Foundation, [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-June/058934.html summarized] some of the objections as follows:

:"It has been legitimately argued that the language links are essential for many users, even if the click rate is lower than that of some other elements, and that they are also key to surfacing our value of language diversity. The reasonable hypothesis has also been presented that the click rates are higher in other languages than English."

Möller and Fung outlined a compromise approach, where only a limited number of language links would be shown per default, and the rest would be hidden under a "see other languages" link. Various ideas were discussed on how to generate a selection that is likely to contain the languages that are most useful to the user (e.g. based on browser language preference). The influence of different configurations on users' clicking behavior will be evaluated.

Altogether, the issue generated more than 160 postings on the Foundation-l mailing list within a few days

(although a good part of this was a sub-thread, started by the Chair of the Board of Trustees, about racial, intercultural and gender issues – at one point readers of the list were educated on the origin of the term lynching in the American Revolution.)

In a subsequent post titled [http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/199025 Community, collaboration, and cognitive biases], Erik Möller observed that "the massive thread regarding the default sidebar language link expansion state has surfaced a number of fundamental and significant questions regarding the working relationship between the Wikimedia Foundation and the larger Wikimedia volunteer community". He offered a number of general thoughts which he summarized as follows:

:"I believe that the transparency of Wikimedia's engineering processes, and the general quality of these processes, has significantly improved over the last year. At the same time, I agree with those who are observing a widening gap between staff and volunteer contributions, and I think we need to work together to close this gap in full awareness of the cognitive biases present in all of us."

===Briefly===

• An [http://wikimania2010.wikimedia.org/wiki/Review_results early version] of the Wikimania 2010 programme has been published.
• Voting on the finalists for the Picture of the Year 2009 contest on Wikimedia Commons is open until 23:59 (UTC) on June 11.
• In an essay titled Wiki-hacking: Opening up the academy with Wikipedia, Wikipedians Adrianne Wadewitz, Anne Ellen Geller and Jon Beasley-Murray examine the relationship between Wikipedia and academic teaching. All three are scholars at North American universities who have worked with their students on Wikipedia assignments (see the 2008 Signpost interview about Beasley-Murray's "Murder, Madness, and Mayhem" project). The essay was written in the context of a round-table titled "[http://www.indiana.edu/~wac2010/abstracts.shtml 2010 A new frontier: teaching with Wikipedia]" at the 2010 "Writing across the curriculum" conference last month at Indiana University.
• The process to determine the two Chapter-selected members of the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees is currently underway after several delays. Currently, these seats are occupied by Michael Snow and Arne Klempert. The process is non-public, but two candidates have published statements: [http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.com/2010/05/board-member-candidate.html GerardM] and [http://www.phoebeayers.info/phlog/?p=1617 phoebe]. Results are due by July 1st, but might be delayed further if the chapters do not reach consensus early enough.

{{Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-article-comments-end||2010-05-31|2010-06-14}}

07 News