Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive188

{{moved discussion from|User:SMcCandlish/ArbCom evidence relating to Darkfrog24|reason=WP:POLEMIC prohibits this being kept forever in my userspace, but it's among the evidence relied upon in the "Dicklyon and Darkfrog24" request, so needs to be preserved somewhere.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  15:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)}}

{{notice|title=Blanked by author, in the interests of looking to the future not the past.|text=

Darkfrog24 seems especially focused on trying to refute points in this evidence, and is distressed that it's so visible on this page, instead of focusing on what ArbCom/AE wants to see in the way of "yes, I understand what it will take to get my block lifted". So, I'm blanking my evidence file. I think this is consistent with WP:POLEMIC; there's no reason to keep this around indefinitely in such a visible way. If it's needed for later review, it can simply be pulled out of the page history.

I wish Darkfrog24 well in their future, constructive endeavors elsewhere in the project. (As I said in the original AE and several followup discussions, I did not think a block was the ideal solution, just a topic-ban, since the editor has been productive elsewhere).
 — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  14:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

}}