Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll/Option3Demo
{{Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll/header}}
Q1. Do you support the merger behind Wikipedia:Attribution?
[You can vote any of the options, or vote 1st option, 2nd option and so forth]
= A. Yes, and the new page should supersede the old ones.=
= B. Yes, but the old pages should remain active to supplement the new page. =
= C. No, and the new page should become inactive. =
= D. No, but the new page should remain active as an explanatory summary. =
= E. Neutral =
Q1v2. Do you support the merger behind Wikipedia:Attribution?
[You can vote any of the options, or vote 1st option, 2nd option and so forth]
= A. Yes, and the new page should supersede the old ones.=
= B. Yes, but the old pages should remain active as guidelines to supplement the new page. =
= C. No, and the new page should become inactive. =
= D. No, but the new page should remain active as an explanatory summary with non-policy status. =
= E. Neutral =
Q1v3. How should the new page, [[Wikipedia:Attribution]], relate to the old pages merged into it.
[You can vote any of the options, or vote 1st option, 2nd option and so forth]
= A. The new page should supersede the old ones.=
= B. The old pages should remain active to supplement the new page. =
= C. The new page should become inactive. =
= D. The new page should remain active as an explanatory summary. =
= E. Neutral =
Q2. If the pages are merged should they include:
[Vote in the appropriate section, "yes" or "no".
=[[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]=
==Yes.==
==No.==
=[[Wikipedia:No original research]]=
==Yes.==
==No.==
=[[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]]=
==Yes.==
==No.==
Comments
: NOTE: Please limit your statement here to 500 words. All replies to points will be refactored/placed onto the poll's talk page. You may change or edit your statement. If you want to endorse someone else's, you may endorse it, but only one total entry per person, please.