Wikipedia talk:Be bold#rfc C58131D

{{Talk header|WT:BOLD|WT:BEBOLD}}

{{metatalk}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(90d)

| archive = Wikipedia talk:Be bold/Archive %(counter)d

| archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}

| counter = 6

| maxarchivesize = 70K

| minthreadsleft = 3

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

}}

Be bold?????

The first sentence reads "We would like everyone to be bold and help make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia."

When I try to find the edit button, all I find is "View source" and "This page is semi-protected".

This is ridiculous.

NB We'll see how long can this bold edit of mine can stay :) 202.40.137.196 (talk) 10:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:Thank you for your effort to improve Wikipedia. There is an explanation of what "semi-protected" means at WP:SEMI . - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 16:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

::Whattttttt 2600:387:C:7215:0:0:0:2 (talk) 00:32, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hetz

Hello,be bold, the user Sophisticatedevening told me that I could consult for the best implementation of this page. My intention was to create an article about people with the surname but it is impossible if they reject any request then we just have to settle for the poorly implemented page that only talks about the term with a single definition and one person added. It is very bad since whoever sees it will think that the meaning of hetz is strictly Hebrew and that is not the case, it is a word from German and Hebrew and also has another meaning in Austria but the surname has no relation to the word, we must be clear that there is no relationship between the term and the surname since the surname is a nickname for Hermann and in individual cases of Hetze (bird).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hetz

This page is poorly implemented and confusing, they should put more definitions and not confuse the word with the surname, reviewing it will reveal people's confusion and we must settle for that Countet (talk) 23:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

There is a lot of discontent, just check the opinions and they are all rejected arbitrarily, not considering the opinion of the users, try to create an article so that they at least make a page of the people with the last name and it was rejected, so there is no way to improve it or they do not accept any request to improve it? Countet (talk) 23:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

: I've made some changes to Hetz that should get you on your way. - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 02:39, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

::thanks, it's a good start Countet (talk) 12:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2025

{{Edit semi-protected|Wikipedia:Be bold|answered=yes}}

I am not going to edit he article on that Alamo because there are too many inaccurate references not only to the historical background ,but it is a blatant piece of propaganda to justify the American take over of land belonging to Mexico. The indigenous population is barely taken into consideration, and the huge bribes that were offered to take over California,Arizona, New Mexico,Texas,etc to Mexican politicians and Generals. Get a Mexican historian to rewrite this rubbish.

:{{not done}}: Not relevant to this page. Sophisticatedevening🍷(talk) 22:58, 14 June 2025 (UTC)