Wikipedia talk:Book sources#Amazon associate number
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{Wikipedia Help Project|class=NA|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Libraries|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Databases|importance =}}
}}
{{Archives|index=/Archive index|age=180|bot=lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Wikipedia talk:Book sources/Archive index
|mask=Wikipedia talk:Book sources/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(180d)
| archive = Wikipedia talk:Book sources/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 4
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
Add TheStoryGraph to list of online databases?
TheStoryGraph is a site similar to GoodReads, which is already on the list, so it should be in scope for the page.
It has a quite large database of books and tools to help people to keep track of to read lists, rate and review books, organize book circles, read-alongs and other activities.
https://thestorygraph.com/
The URL for a given ISBN should probably be https://app.thestorygraph.com/browse?search_term=MAGICNUMBER 212.247.182.250 (talk) 08:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Copyright Clearance Center
Do we want to keep Copyright Clearance Center in the list? What would be the justification? While I don't think it's completely meaningless, the chance of being it useful seems slim in the context of clicking an ISBN link in a Wikipedia article. CCC's main service seems to be to help acquiring permission to reuse proprietary content with a fee. (But I doubt it helps you to persuade an author to release their work under CC BY SA.) I found [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Book_sources/Archive_1#c-Skottk-2007-06-21T20:49:00.000Z-Museophile this note] in the talk page archives but it didn't provide much reasoning behind the addition. If someone needs help in accessing sources, I think the other links here are enough. Whym (talk) 10:06, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
:Any thoughts? While there is no hurry, I would like to remove it at some point, if nobody disagrees. Whym (talk) 05:53, 23 February 2025 (UTC)