Wikipedia talk:Gadget/proposals#rfc C957D55

{{archive top|reason=Marked as historical Discussion here was limited (not for lack of trying though) and seems to have died down so I decided to close instead of comment. There is unanimous support for marking it as historical. I'm going to direct new proposals to VPT since that has explicit support and in my experience would probably understand the technical gadget side of this better than VPP. Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɻɪbz] 21:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)}}

No admins have edited this page in a few months. I think it's safe to say the page has been quite inactive. Even a AN discussion couldn't revive it. I propose this page be marked historical and further gadget proposals should go to VPPR or VPT. (Pinging {{u|BD2412}}, {{u|Nihiltres}}, {{u|Kaldari}}, {{u|Keegan}}, {{u|PaleAqua}}, {{u|Quiddity}}, and {{u|Equazcion}}.) Enterprisey (talk!) _{(formerly APerson)} 00:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

:Seems like a reasonable idea to me. Kaldari (talk) 17:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

:Agreed. Quiddity (talk) 21:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

:I agree. This page is probably too remote to receive a lot of attention. VPT is more likely to get stuff done.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:07, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

{{archive bottom}}

For posterity, the "AN discussion" I was referring to has been archived. Enterprisey (talk!) 21:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)