Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trademarks#Saints Row IV

{{shortcut|WT:MOSTM}}

{{Talk header}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|

{{WikiProject Manual of Style}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}

|maxarchivesize = 300K

|counter = 17

|minthreadsleft = 4

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(90d)

|archive = Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trademarks/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |target=Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trademarks/Archive index |mask=Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trademarks/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=no}}

__TOC__

Discussion at [[:Talk:Pnau#Pnau and PNAU|Talk:Pnau §&nbsp;Pnau and PNAU]]

File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pnau § Pnau and PNAU. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at [[Talk:Xkcd#Requested move 29 March 2025]]

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Xkcd#Requested move 29 March 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. FaviFake (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

The General rules section is too messy

I believe the section Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Trademarks#General_rules to be very confusing in its current state. I think it should be reformatted into a table, or more distinct sections. It feels like a bunch of different rules stuck together. FaviFake (talk) 10:05, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

:No. It was more clear before your changes. – The Grid (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

::Well, I changed nothing in the way the content is displayed. Do you think it would be better formatted as distinct sections, or as a table, or something else? FaviFake (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

:::I would wait until the discussions with xkcd are closed. – The Grid (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

::::...is that a yes? The ongoing discussion on xkcd is not about the formatting of a MOS page, it's about a policy issue. I'm not suggesting we change the guidelines. FaviFake (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::It's a no because you're still changing a page that's relevant to the discussion. – The Grid (talk) 15:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::Oh nono I wasn't going to reformat it myself, I never wanted to. I created this section to ask other people if they agreed and wanted to do it themselves FaviFake (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Conflict with guideline on citations

Just a note I started a thread at Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#Conforming citations to Wikipedia style regarding guidance which appears to conflict with MOS:CONFORMTITLE, MOS:CONFORM, and MOS:TMRULES, if anyone here is interested in participating. -- Beland (talk) 03:50, 15 April 2025 (UTC)