Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Berig 2
Edit count for Berig
User:Berig
run at Sat Oct 25 20:51:21 2008 GMT
Category: 57
Image: 155
Mainspace 12373
Portal: 2
Talk: 3681
Template talk: 131
Template: 93
User talk: 963
User: 290
Wikipedia talk: 104
Wikipedia: 491
avg edits per page 3.79
earliest 16:59, 18 August 2006
number of unique pages 4841
total 18340
2006/8 62
2006/9 1262
2006/10 661
2006/11 1204
2006/12 859
2007/1 1646
2007/2 82
2007/3 18
2007/4 274
2007/5 3000
2007/6 1943
2007/7 667
2007/8 516
2007/9 253
2007/10 828
2007/11 476
2007/12 87
2008/1 51
2008/2 786
2008/3 691
2008/4 873
2008/5 873
2008/6 425
2008/7 494
2008/8 136
2008/9 118
2008/10 55
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red
denotes edits without an edit summary)
Mainspace
375 [2]Greece Runestones
307 [3]Hro�gar
194 [4]Ingvar Runestones
174 [5]Beowulf
170 [6]Varangian Runestones
159 [7]Runestone
132 [8]England Runestones
129 [9]Jarlabanke Runestones
126 [10]Viking Runestones
120 [11]Viking funeral
102 [12]D�s
101 [13]V�lva
100 [14]Halga
95 [15]Eadgils
82 [16]Swedes (Germanic tribe)
Talk:
96 [17]King of the Geats
90 [18]Eadgils
85 [19]Estonian pirates
76 [20]Old Norse
65 [21]House of Muns�
65 [22]Beowulf
63 [23]Germanic peoples
58 [24]Swedes (Germanic tribe)
51 [25]History of Sweden (800-1521)
42 [26]Ragnvald Ulfsson
33 [27]Br�singamen
29 [28]Gothiscandza
29 [29]Goths
28 [30]Kj�rr
27 [31]Scandinavia
Category:
5 [32]Rune- and picture stones on Gotland
5 [33]Danish Runic Inscriptions
4 [34]Runestones, Estrid
4 [35]Geats
3 [36]Heroes in Norse myths and legends
3 [37]Varangians
2 [38]Jutes
2 [39]Ha�uwulf's runestones
2 [40]Runestones raised in memory of women
2 [41]English heroic legends
2 [42]People in Norse mythology and legends
2 [43]Viking Age women
2 [44]Runestones in memory of Viking warriors
2 [45]Runestones in Sm�land
Image:
7 [46]Uffe den spake.jpg
7 [47]Skjold kaares til konge.jpg
5 [48]Haugsetting2.jpg
5 [49]Hr�lfr Kraki's last stand.jpg
4 [50]Eric the victorious.jpg
4 [51]Haugsetting.jpg
4 [52]England runestones.jpg
3 [53]Eric's kingdom (870s).png
3 [54]Greece runestones.JPG
3 [55]Norns1.jpg
3 [56]Bloodeagle.jpg
2 [57]Dalrunor.png
2 [58]C.F. Christensen 1833.jpg
2 [59]Dotted m-rune.jpg
2 [60]Norns3by CEBrock.jpg
Portal:
2 [61]Ancient Germanic culture/Selected picture/3
Template:
11 [62]Runestones
8 [63]Infobox Runestone
7 [64]Uruz infobox
6 [65]Myarchive
4 [66]Germanic peoples
3 [67]WPMILHIST Announcements/Nordic military history
3 [68]Othalan infobox
3 [69]V�lsung
3 [70]Germanic tribes (750 BC - 1 AD)
3 [71]Hrethling
3 [72]Ansuz infobox
2 [73]Scandinavia
2 [74]Odin
2 [75]Ingwaz infobox
2 [76]Germanic philology
Template talk:
109 [77]Did you know
16 [78]Germanic peoples
4 [79]Germanic tribes (750 BC - 1 AD)
2 [80]Germanic philology
User:
206 [81]Berig/workspace
75 [82]Berig
2 [83]Drieakko
2 [84]Pia L
User talk:
294 [85]Berig
86 [86]Haukurth
41 [87]Pia L
41 [88]Varoon Arya
39 [89]Briangotts
37 [90]Bloodofox
32 [91]Dbachmann
19 [92]Dr Steven Plunkett
17 [93]Frater Xyzzy
14 [94]Ghirlandajo
14 [95]Skadinaujo
13 [96]Goldenrowley
11 [97]Grimhelm
11 [98]Drieakko
11 [99]FrummerThanThou/Archive 1
Wikipedia:
31 [100]WikiProject Norse history and culture
28 [101]Fringe theories/Noticeboard
18 [102]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies/Runes
10 [103]Peer review/Hro�gar/archive1
10 [104]Featured article review/Sverre of Norway/archive1
7 [105]Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
6 [106]Requests for adminship/Berig
6 [107]Reliable sources/Noticeboard
4 [108]WikiProject Military history/Nordic military history task force
4 [109]Articles for deletion/Britney Spears Song
4 [110]Deletion review/Log/2008 July 25
4 [111]Articles for deletion/BSAUA
4 [112]Articles for deletion/Psilalonia Square
4 [113]Images and media for deletion/2008 June 20
4 [114]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies
Wikipedia talk:
33 [115]WikiProject Military history/Nordic military history task force
21 [116]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies
18 [117]WikiProject Norse history and culture
11 [118]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies/Runes
7 [119]Good articles
5 [120]Swedish Wikipedians' notice board/Terminology
2 [121]Civility
2 [122]Reliable sources
2 [123]Footnotes
If there were any problems, please [124]email Interiot or post at
[125]User talk:Interiot.
- The edit count was retrieved from [http://toolserver.org/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=Berig&site=en.wikipedia.org this link] at 20:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC).
Size of A Nobody
Just wondering, but how long did it take you to write that? RockManQ (talk) 01:35, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
:I did not time myself, but I would say several minutes as I looked at every discussion in which we both participated, checked block logs, looked over the candidate's userpage, wrote up a thorough comment as I did so, proofread it, etc. I figure if I am going to bother to comment in these, I want to make sure I add something new to the discussion that someone else has not yet said and that is comprehensive enough to be fair and clear. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 01:59, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
::Heh, might just be me, but it always seems your rationales keep getting longer (support or oppose). Not that that's a bad thing. RockManQ (talk) 02:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
:::Well, if I just said oppose for the reasons I wanted to oppose, someone would say here or on my talk page that I am only opposing because we disagreed in certain discussions, which wouldn't actually be true, because I never really just consider one aspect of an admin candidate when I look at them for an RfA. So, I increasingly find myself having to make as comprehensive of a rationale as possible. Plus, as I indicate in my oppose, I really do value well thought out and unique contributions to discussions and think it's important to present information and ideas not considered by others. But I better stop myself from rambling! :) --A NobodyMy talk 03:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
::::I have no problem with longer reationales---especially in the oppose section. It shows that the person did in fact research the candidate before !voting. It also substantiates the !vote. I'd rather see a long well reasoned rationale, than a short "Oppose, don't like how candidates votes at AfD's."---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 05:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
:::::Detailed (rather than merely "long" - substance is the key) rationales can influence other editors, which is useful, and can be very helpful to Crats. --Dweller (talk) 20:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)