Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Diez2

I trawled Diez's deleted edits and compiled some data on deletion tagging (speedy, prod, and AFD nominations). These are from the last 100 deleted edits, going back to this February:

1. User:Gosswriter, another editor created a userpage for someone; no warning.
2. Tom wimpelman, valid A7, no warning.
3. Abbasieh, Israeli village, no warning
4. The highest minster in power, nonsense, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Razile&oldid=127869103 warned]
5. Shawn neldon, attack page, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANeldonado&diff=127729246&oldid=127419575 warned]
6. Myke walker, valid a7, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Scott559234&oldid=127727161 warned]
7. Idris Jusoh, revert to replace a speedy tag, editor already warned
8. Sadhvi Ritambhara, prod, created by an IP in 2005 in its only two edits, no warning or clear candidate for a warning
9. George Fairholme, prod, similar situation with an IP, this one belong to a university
10. Geoff Follin, prod, editor who created in 2005 is still active now, no warning
11. Vitron, valid A7, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVitron&diff=110382027&oldid=97687188 warned]
12. Don Alhart, news anchor tagged as A7, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEAGLES7918&diff=110123925&oldid=103284569 warned]
13. BULLDOG BAR, valid G11 (spam), [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABLURRED2007&diff=110116037&oldid=109687771 warned]
14. Howard burkons, valid g7, author blanked page, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APlanetPen&diff=109579828&oldid=109351794 notified]
15. Adrian pittorino, attack page, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Skiv&diff=107740726&oldid=86625484 warned]
16. Kovoism, initially prodded, later deleted through AFD, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kovo88&diff=106333713&oldid=106331800 warned]
17. Colony (CMS), via AFD, created by IP in 2005, no clear candidate for warning
18. Cook International, prod in Feb, '07, no warning, but no edits by creator except article creation in January, '06
19. Bradley Turcotte, AFD, again no warning, but no edits since one to that article last September

I'm happy to do more if people want me to go back further.--Chaser - T 04:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Chaser, as ever you dilligent research is valued. Thank you so much. As the above evidences about a 50% level of warning my oppose in the discussion still stands. I know the warning are not mandatory, but they are recommended and IMHO it is a courtesy to advise the creator of the article on theit talk page of the tag, rather than awaiting a bot to advise them the article has gone. Pedro |  Chat  11:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

:I respect the painstaking research you did, Chaser, but if you do look at my CSD tagging from November 2006 (and before, since this is what Pedro's oppose vote is about), then you will see that I warned almost everyone about their about-to-be-deleted pages. Please take a look, thank you. Diez2 18:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

::Well, if you want me to go spend more time doing this, why don't you tell me first why you changed the regularity with which you warned people?--Chaser - T 18:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC) Nevermind. I offered. I'll do it.--Chaser - T 22:08, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

OK, these are from 2 & 3 November 2006:

1. Morzh, no warning
2. Meech, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Djc718&oldid=85272765 warned]
3. Aaron Dunmire, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Crazygtrkd&oldid=85272840 warned]
4. Aquietmind, AFD listing, no warning
5. South Division High School, no warning
6. Mat Chamberlain, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mcwells07&oldid=85401038 warned]
7. The Tigers and Bears, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rugratfan1025&diff=85401341&oldid=85260113 warned]
8. Faunacide, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKanemon&diff=85401988&oldid=85401748 warned]
9. A list of Japanese trains, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GoodGoodGH&oldid=85402352 warned]
10. Flamboyant willbo, warned at User talk:Willbo140, now deleted
11. Mark Thomas : Editor, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Takurangi&oldid=85402621 warned]
12. I-Television, no warning
13. Microworlds JR, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bsherry&diff=85402845&oldid=84417654 warned]
14. Paly Robotics, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tuneweaver13&oldid=85403041 warned]
15. Lamfung, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tianle312&oldid=85403092 warned]
16. Jessica Mata!!!!!, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dcdubaya&diff=85403385&oldid=85402972 warned]
17. Eric Kam, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Erickam&oldid=85403444 warned]
18. We must overthrow, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert25&diff=85403598&oldid=85403571 warned]

I'm not doing any more.--Chaser - T 04:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Some of the opposes that talk about IAR bother me. If asked when they would ignore the rules, and someone responds by talking about situations where flexibility and judgment are required, this is a reasonable answer IMO. Contrast this with a few of the opposers, who talk about IAR as though it were a rule to be invoked. These opposes carry little weight in my opinion. Friday (talk) 14:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)