Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Malcolmxl5

Edit count for Malcolmxl5

User:Malcolmxl5

run at Sat Aug 23 14:36:49 2008 GMT

Category: 8

Image talk: 2

Image: 5

Mainspace 10961

Portal: 3

Talk: 2452

Template: 18

User talk: 437

User: 620

Wikipedia talk: 224

Wikipedia: 1449

avg edits per page 2.28

earliest 23:18, 9 April 2007

number of unique pages 7087

total 16179

2007/4 77

2007/5 206

2007/6 611

2007/7 867

2007/8 807

2007/9 1127

2007/10 1068

2007/11 1101

2007/12 2751

2008/1 1180

2008/2 534

2008/3 1184

2008/4 737

2008/5 1272

2008/6 776

2008/7 1225

2008/8 656

(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red

denotes edits without an edit summary)

Mainspace

147 [2]Lomana LuaLua

92 [3]Nigel Reo-Coker

84 [4]Celtic F.C. season 2000-01

82 [5]Freddy Eastwood

79 [6]Scott Carson

76 [7]Carlton Cole

76 [8]Teddy Sheringham

74 [9]Jermain Defoe

70 [10]Billy Bonds

63 [11]Stephen Bywater

60 [12]First Civil Service Commissioner

55 [13]Hayden Mullins

54 [14]Office for National Statistics

54 [15]Bobby Zamora

51 [16]Marlon Harewood

Talk:

23 [17]Freddy Eastwood

17 [18]Carlos T�vez

11 [19]Yossi Benayoun

8 [20]William Lawrence Balls

8 [21]Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

7 [22]Scott Parker (footballer)

7 [23]Arthur James Turner

6 [24]Julian Waterfall Pollack

6 [25]Trenton, Ontario

5 [26]Rayavaram (Krishna district)

5 [27]Billy Bonds

5 [28]Edward Vick

5 [29]Tilbury

4 [30]George Kay

4 [31]Alan Curbishley

Image:

4 [32]Keynsham Town.JPG

Portal:

2 [33]Wales/New article announcements

Template:

3 [34]Mansfield Town F.C. squad

2 [35]Wrexham F.C. squad

User:

248 [36]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox

174 [37]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult

70 [38]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox2

61 [39]Malcolmxl5

12 [40]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive5

11 [41]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive4

9 [42]Woody/Sandbox

4 [43]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive2

4 [44]Fabrictramp

3 [45]Gogo Dodo

2 [46]Justmeherenow/Obama family of Kenya/Sandbox

2 [47]West Ham Fan

2 [48]MediaStudies110

User talk:

53 [49]Malcolmxl5

10 [50]Gogo Dodo

8 [51]Muffin Man 23

7 [52]69.157.65.118

6 [53]Poeloq

6 [54]Malcolmxl5/Archive 1

6 [55]Blotto adrift

5 [56]Joseffudge

5 [57]Redrocket

5 [58]Mr Hall of England

4 [59]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox

4 [60]Kurt Shaped Box

4 [61]Meco

4 [62]207.188.72.46

4 [63]86.160.240.191

Wikipedia:

150 [64]WikiProject Football

30 [65]WikiProject Football/New articles

14 [66]WikiProject Football/Booklist

12 [67]Articles for deletion/Frankie Loscavio

11 [68]Articles for deletion/Lewis Stanson

9 [69]WikiProject Football/Links

9 [70]Articles for deletion/Tymm Hoffman

9 [71]Articles for deletion/Nicolai Lomov

9 [72]Pages needing translation into English

8 [73]Administrator intervention against vandalism

7 [74]Articles for deletion/GlavUpDK

7 [75]Articles for deletion/Systemshock

7 [76]Articles for deletion/Celtic F.C. season 2000-01

6 [77]Articles for deletion/Log/2007 November 15

6 [78]Articles for deletion/John FitzGerald

Wikipedia talk:

165 [79]WikiProject Football

6 [80]New pages patrol/patrolled pages

5 [81]WikiProject Non-league football

3 [82]WikiProject Automobiles/Archive 10

3 [83]WikiProject Astronomy

3 [84]Manual of Style (flags)

2 [85]WikiProject Mathematics

2 [86]Noticeboard for India-related topics

2 [87]WikiProject Australia

2 [88]WikiProject Topical outlines

2 [89]Archived delete discussions

If there were any problems, please [90]email Interiot or post at

[91]User talk:Interiot.

  • The edit count was retrieved from [http://toolserver.org/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=Malcolmxl5&site=en.wikipedia.org this link] at 14:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC).
  1. :* Surely an admin candidate who !votes Delete in AfDs for obviously non-encyclopedic articles should be a reason to support, not oppose? Or am I missing something? All those articles were obvious deletes apart from the two that ended up merge/no consensus. If we opposed everyone who !voted Delete on an AfD that was eventually kept, we'd have no admins at all. Also, some of those AfDs are over a year old.... bizarre. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Oppose vote by La Grande Roi

  1. ::*From what I know, Le Grand Roi opposes the candidate if they have opposing viewpoints on any RfAs - CL — 19:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  2. :::*This is one of the the most idiotic and personal opposes I've seen. Yanksox (talk) 20:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  3. ::::*Immature responses are not how to convince people to support. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 20:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  4. ::*I am opposing because those were encyclopedic articles that were unjustifiably deleted. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 20:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  5. :::*This is a personal vendetta against the deleting admin, not the candidate at large. Furthermore, I'm sick of people that act almost like mere pond scum and just pounce on this like a soapbox. I remember one character in particular that did it to my RfA and others and was blocked sometime after for being a sockmaster. I'm not saying anything in particular, but just putting it out there. Yanksox (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  6. ::::*What?! I am opposing because I disagree with the candidate's interpretation of inclusion criteria and how they would likely close AfDs. Those discussions I cite above were closed by several different admins. Which one do I allegedly have a vendetta against? --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 20:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  7. :::*This is not a vendetta against the deleting admin, but against all admins who have ever deleted anything. --T-rex 21:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  8. ::::*If that were so, then I would not have would have to oppose those who closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adams equation, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adult-child sex (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alhaji sani labaran, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagot Beast, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butt harp, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canyon of the Vaginas, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delboo, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorian's identity, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy-cook rice (joke), etc. I don't oppose people because they argue to delete as I myself have argued and nominated to delete more articles than I good number of editors I have seen have argued to keep. I oppose based on what and why editors argued to delete. Someone can actually be a deletionist of sorts and every thing they argued to delete I might not disagree with. Look through those whom I have supported and I am sure they have argued to delete here and there. It has nothing to do with simply arguing to delete, again, it is what I believe to be misinterpretations of inclusion criteria or incorrect arguments. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 21:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  9. :Le Grand Roi, I understand your opinion, but can you at least provide diffs from, well, 2008 next time? Wizardman 21:24, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  10. ::I shall keep that in mind. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 21:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  11. :::Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles has a right to oppose. He opposed my RFA, but I learned a lot because of his oppose !vote. It is important for editors to understand that deleting some articles can undo years of work of other editors. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 10:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC)