Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/MastCell

First let me say I am a blocked user. I'm sure this will be deleted and Mastcell will probably come in and censor this but I am behooved to set the record straight on user MastCell. He should not be trusted. I am blocked user "user:Regulations." I was blocked in a blanket IP block. An administrative error was made. Many users were blocked with the claim that they were sockpuppets of user "user:Billy Ego." (The fact that they can't block me from making sockpuppets just goes to show that this IP is used for a wide geographic area for a major ISP, and that errors can easily be made. If they block this IP they block a whole area of the U.S.) Note that Billy Ego was a self-proclaimed "fascist." That's why he was blocked actually. I am a libertarian, which is the opposite. If you look at the other users that were blocked, there was no evidence of sockpuppetry other than their IP. In fact one was even an an anarcho-capitalist; his username was "user:Anarcho-capitalism" who even received awards for his or her editing. Now, MastCell knows good and well the I am not this "Billy Ego" character because he knows from the articles that he's been involved in are the same one's I've been involved in and knows that I am a libertarian, not a fascist. MastCell knows that an administrative error was made. But, when I make a sockpuppet to resume editing and he finds it, he gets the sockpuppet blocked. Of course, this is simple mindless administrative duties that an adminstrator ordinarily would not be criticized for. But, the fact that I knows I am not BillyEgo shows the lack of ethics on his part. If he had any real ETHICS he would ignore a sockpuppet of me, because he knows I am not a sockpuppet of BillyEgo. He is using this administrative error to prevent me from providing NPOV, information, and balance to medical articles. MastCell is well-known to be against heath freedom. He believes in draconian regulation and restrictions on what people may purchase and one what they may sell. He doesn't care or doesnt understand that at some point of increasing regulation it begins causing more harm than good. He tries his best to push his pro regulation POV in medical articles. (Maybe he works for the FDA). He knows I am for health freedom. And he knows that I source my edits and provide important information and balance to articles. He knows that I don't POV push but merely provide sourced information. His sole motive is to censor the other side. Make no mistake. The reason that he is seeking adminiship is because of me and others like me. He wants to be able to claim anyone that seems to represent a pro-freedom viewpoint is a sockpuppet of Billy Ego or me, Regulations, and then block them, without even a Checkuser. He is seeking adminship for the sole purpose of being able to block people without a Checkuser. MastCell should be not an adminstrator. He is abusive and unethical, and will be even more so if he is given any power. Reguboard 19:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

:It is obvious you are not a sock, libertarianism and fascism is completely incompatible. Wooyi^{Talk, Editor review} 20:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC)