Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Silver seren

Username: Silver seren

User groups: reviewer, rollbacker

First edit: Jun 23, 2006 14:19:28

Unique pages edited: 1,665

Average edits per page: 4.06

Live edits: 6,374

Deleted edits: 385

Total edits (including deleted): 6,759

Namespace Totals

Article 2576 40.41%

Talk 555 8.71%

User 523 8.21%

User talk 1210 18.98%

Wikipedia 1238 19.42%

Wikipedia talk 193 3.03%

File 3 0.05%

Template talk 61 0.96%

Category 1 0.02%

Category talk 14 0.22%

Namespace Totals Pie Chart

Month counts

2006/06 8

2006/07 0

2006/08 0

2006/09 0

2006/10 0

2006/11 0

2006/12 11

2007/01 12

2007/02 19

2007/03 17

2007/04 73

2007/05 15

2007/06 15

2007/07 381

2007/08 656

2007/09 12

2007/10 0

2007/11 7

2007/12 0

2008/01 5

2008/02 1

2008/03 0

2008/04 0

2008/05 0

2008/06 0

2008/07 0

2008/08 0

2008/09 0

2008/10 0

2008/11 0

2008/12 156

2009/01 0

2009/02 7

2009/03 13

2009/04 46

2009/05 14

2009/06 45

2009/07 0

2009/08 0

2009/09 89

2009/10 1

2009/11 0

2009/12 0

2010/01 0

2010/02 0

2010/03 753

2010/04 918

2010/05 1053

2010/06 6

2010/07 32

2010/08 1006

2010/09 1003

Top edited pages

(hide)Article

* 68 - Northern_Rocky_Mountains_Wolf

* 41 - Mayoori_(actress)

* 39 - Warrior_(wrestler)

* 36 - Alexander_Archipelago_Wolf

* 34 - Saffron_terror

* 33 - Kaavalan

* 33 - Jackie_Evancho

* 31 - Life_at_the_Bottom:_The_Worldview_That_Makes_the_U...

* 28 - Yukon_Wolf

* 28 - Andy_Bachetti

(hide)Talk

* 93 - Criticism_of_Judaism

* 42 - Gaia_Online

* 34 - Reincarnation_research

* 23 - Northern_Rocky_Mountains_Wolf

* 17 - Kharsag

* 14 - Saffron_terror

* 10 - Chiropractic

* 10 - Nair

* 9 - Jackie_Evancho

* 8 - Vampire:_The_Masquerade_–_Bloodlines

(hide)User

* 276 - Silver_seren/Userpage

* 95 - Silver_seren

* 55 - Silver_seren/Sandbox

* 12 - Silver_seren/easy_to_view_userboxes

* 11 - Silver_seren/Joke

* 8 - Silver_seren/List_of_Wikipedians_We_Have_Lost

* 8 - Sidatio/Conversations/On_list_guidelines

* 6 - Silver_seren/icons

* 4 - Silver_seren/Useful_Links_and_Information

* 4 - Silver_seren/How_I_Feel_About_The_Project

(hide)User talk

* 83 - Silver_seren

* 80 - Kkrouni

* 51 - Moonriddengirl

* 46 - Jimbo_Wales

* 45 - Thefunk42

* 33 - Chrishy_man

* 30 - Sidatio

* 17 - Ashura96

* 16 - Cirt

* 14 - Spriteless

(hide)Wikipedia

* 179 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents

* 94 - Article_Rescue_Squadron/Hall_of_Fame

* 53 - Village_pump_(policy)

* 33 - Reliable_sources/Noticeboard

* 21 - Articles_for_deletion/Saffron_Terror

* 16 - Articles_for_deletion/Criticism_of_Judaism_(2nd_no...

* 15 - Articles_for_deletion/Machine_to_Machine

* 15 - Articles_for_deletion/Kharsag

* 14 - Village_pump_(proposals)

* 14 - Articles_for_deletion/Cairo_International_Model_Un...

(hide)Wikipedia talk

* 66 - Child_protection

* 34 - Article_Rescue_Squadron

* 16 - Article_titles

* 9 - Notability_(sports)

* 9 - Neutral_point_of_view

* 8 - Did_you_know

* 6 - Pending_changes/Straw_poll_on_interim_usage

* 5 - Notability

* 5 - Counter-Vandalism_Unit

* 5 - Subtle_Vandalism_Taskforce

(hide)File

* 2 - Life_at_the_Bottom_Cover.jpg

* 1 - Northern_Rocky_Mountains_wolf.jpg

(hide)Template talk

* 61 - Did_you_know

(hide)Category

* 1 - Hindu_terrorism

(hide)Category talk

* 12 - Hindu_terrorism

* 2 - Sociology

Retrieved from [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/ec/Silver+seren X!'s counter] at 06:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Closing rationale

Although the consensus was that Silver seren is a civil and constructive editor, the opposition focused mainly on an ideological point of view with regards to the editor's inclusionism. I saw in a few !votes a logical link to previous trends of admin behavior from the extremes of the inclusionism/deletionism debate, but the evidence for these trends is rather tenuous. It's better explained by the fact that there tends to be a visceral reaction towards people who hold strong, different opinions. Thankfully, there were many opposes that looked past this and managed to properly provide areas of concern and improvement for the nominee. There was one !vote that came in after the time expiry, an oppose, but either way the consensus had been formed before its inclusion. Because of that, I have not removed it. bibliomaniac15 05:42, 6 October 2010 (UTC)