Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Soap

Retrieved from [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name=Soap&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia toolserver.org] at 13:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC).

Username: Soap

User groups: abusefilter, rollbacker

First edit: Jan 08, 2006 12:24:19

Unique pages edited: 5,631

Average edits per page: 2.38

Live edits: 12,805

Deleted edits: 593

Total edits (including deleted): 13,398

Article 5597 43.71%

Talk 683 5.33%

User 1028 8.03%

User talk 2877 22.47%

Wikipedia 2239 17.49%

Wikipedia talk 231 1.80%

File 18 0.14%

File talk 11 0.09%

MediaWiki talk 29 0.23%

Template 51 0.40%

Template talk 31 0.24%

Help talk 1 0.01%

Category 1 0.01%

Category talk 2 0.02%

Portal 5 0.04%

Portal talk 1 0.01%

Monthly totals

2006/01 6

2006/02 3

2006/03 8

2006/04 4

2006/05 19

2006/06 18

2006/07 9

2006/08 14

2006/09 27

2006/10 41

2006/11 37

2006/12 16

2007/01 17

2007/02 10

2007/03 36

2007/04 16

2007/05 73

2007/06 21

2007/07 46

2007/08 23

2007/09 50

2007/10 95

2007/11 61

2007/12 118

2008/01 105

2008/02 114

2008/03 137

2008/04 111

2008/05 54

2008/06 31

2008/07 124

2008/08 94

2008/09 142

2008/10 348

2008/11 359

2008/12 416

2009/01 436

2009/02 698

2009/03 393

2009/04 260

2009/05 576

2009/06 468

2009/07 332

2009/08 468

2009/09 513

2009/10 426

2009/11 502

2009/12 530

2010/01 631

2010/02 651

2010/03 679

2010/04 926

2010/05 1265

2010/06 248

Top edited pages

Article

* 150 - Soap

* 92 - Diaper

* 84 - Pillow

* 74 - Die_Lollipops

* 60 - Autism

* 57 - Lollipop

* 56 - H.U.R.L.

* 50 - List_of_people_on_the_autism_spectrum

* 48 - Dora_the_Explorer

* 44 - The_Raspberry_Ice_Cream_War

Talk

* 36 - Asperger_syndrome

* 31 - Gadsby:_Champion_of_Youth

* 26 - Autism_Speaks

* 22 - Xkcd

* 22 - Diaper

* 18 - Autism

* 15 - Human_height

* 13 - Masturbation

* 12 - Dora_the_Explorer

* 12 - Soap

User

* 363 - Soap

* 167 - Soap/Sandbox

* 41 - Soap/monobook.css

* 39 - X!/RfX_Report

* 37 - Soap/DIY

* 19 - Soap/UVoD

* 18 - Soap/Termitomyces_albuminosus

* 17 - Soap/AfD

* 16 - Soap/RfA

* 16 - Soap/monobook.js

User talk

* 46 - Soap

* 39 - White_Shadows

* 28 - Juliancolton

* 27 - Soap/Archive_9

* 23 - The_Thing_That_Should_Not_Be

* 19 - Sandbox_for_user_warnings

* 19 - Eubulides

* 18 - NuclearWarfare

* 17 - Cacycle/wikEd

* 14 - X!

Wikipedia

* 394 - Edit_filter/False_positives/Reports

* 275 - Edit_filter/False_positives

* 135 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents

* 106 - Usernames_for_administrator_attention

* 84 - Usernames_for_administrator_attention/Bot

* 83 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism

* 42 - Requests_for_page_protection

* 37 - Edit_filter/Requested

* 36 - Changing_username/Simple

* 29 - Administrators'_noticeboard

Wikipedia talk

* 85 - Edit_filter

* 44 - Requests_for_adminship

* 9 - User_pages

* 9 - Username_policy

* 6 - Usernames_for_administrator_attention

* 5 - Did_you_know

* 4 - WikiProject_Cities

* 4 - Requests_for_adminship/A_new_name_2008

* 4 - Requests_for_comment/User_names

* 4 - Today's_featured_article

File

* 7 - Hurl_level_8.jpg

* 4 - Dora_grows_up.jpg

* 2 - EdinayaRossiya.jpg

* 1 - Cyrillic_letter_Multiocular_O.png

* 1 - Baboon_buttocks.jpg

* 1 - Cyclone_Catarina_from_the_ISS_on_March_26_2004.JPG

* 1 - Bugbear_Dark_Alliance.jpg

* 1 - 800px-non-Admin_JollyRoger.GIF

File talk

* 4 - Netherlands_map_large.png

* 3 - WP_CHU_checklist.svg

* 1 - Braces_smile_purple.jpg

* 1 - Mature_flower_diagram.svg

* 1 - Autistic-sweetiepie-boy-with-ducksinarow.jpg

* 1 - Wikipe-tan_face.svg

MediaWiki talk

* 23 - Titleblacklist

* 5 - Spam-blacklist

* 1 - Abusefilter-warning-skype

Template

* 3 - Dollarsign/doc/todo

* 3 - Introduction_to_Wikipedia

* 2 - Infobox_language

* 2 - RfA

* 2 - Infobox_comic_book_title

* 2 - SPIarchive_notice

* 2 - Comics_infobox_sec/genre

* 2 - Location_map_polarx

* 2 - Bradshaw

* 2 - 911ct

Template talk

* 7 - Introduction_to_Wikipedia

* 5 - User_Asperger

* 4 - Did_you_know

* 4 - Location_map_polarx

* 3 - Infobox_Jews

* 2 - Talkback

* 2 - Retired

* 1 - Copyvio

* 1 - User_Asperger/Archive_1

* 1 - Politics_box

Help talk

* 1 - Edit_conflict

Just a hypothetical

All this praise.. I'm wondering if Soap is now feeling pressured to live up to these lofty expectations of perfection. If and when he actually DOES make a minor screw-up it'll probably come as a shock to everyone get blown out of proportion! -- œ ^™ 03:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

:I can't speak for others, but I certainly wouldn't hold it against him if he made a mistake. Everyone screws up sometimes, no matter how good they are. The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk) 15:10, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

::I'll type up a thank-you statement on my talk page after the RfA is over; as for meeting people's expectations, I don't think anyone's expecting me to be perfect, but I will be very careful. —Soap— 17:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Discussion regarding WarthogDemon's support

You have, at amazing speed, surpassed my very hard requirements for an AUTOMATIC SUPPORT (Those requirements being, having over 100 supports and NEVER - even temporarily - having any opposes or neutrals.) -WarthogDemon 01:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
:Well that's moronic. So your standards are that other people like the person? Ironholds (talk) 01:32, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
::Well I'm sure that there is a very low chance that all of those one hundred people are completely wrong that a user deserves adminship. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
::It would be moronic if that was the only way I'd ever support, but such is not the case. If there are over 100 supports and never any opposes or neutrals, I'm not going to search for any cons or any reasons not to support. Since, as SuperHamster says, if 100 people don't find concerns than it's unlikely I will. If a member doesn't meet those "standards" I may still support, it's just then that I browse through the contributions and base my judgment on that. Now, I do hope that what I just typed isn't chock-full of run-on sentences... -WarthogDemon 03:16, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
:::You should seriously review the candidate for yourself and make up your own mind. Blindly supporting because of the nominator or because of other supporters is very dangerous and it's exactly the type of !voting that helped a certain banned user get through RfA. It is entirely possible that the 100 people voting before you missed something or didn't even bother to do a review because they trusted the nominator or the other people supporting. I don't want to say that it's moronic, but I do think it's very dangerous and I think you should review candidates yourself and make up your own mind (or not take a position at all). RfAs have got high support only to then swing around when a later user brings something to attention but if everyone was voting automatically after 100 supports those things wouldn't come to light until too late. Sarah 04:32, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
::::I did not intend to start a dispute on here, nor do I think this is one, but apparently I have made myself seem more reckless than I actually am. I do indeed review candidates, and the circumstances of which I just blindly support almost never happen. But just to make sure, I decided to check through the archives to see how many admins in the past that would include. Out of 1000+ RFAs, the number of Admins who've had +100 supports, and never at any point had neutrals or opposes is: 9. That's less than 1%. Anyways, I'll stop debating this, as I don't want to spam this editor's page with this. I apologize if I come across as reckless and I want to assure you I do things with care. Honestly, with the majority of RFAs I look at, I usually find myself unable to make my mind. -WarthogDemon 05:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

:Moved from project page