Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Noloop#RFC...

But how come were not listed at the RFC place?Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 14:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

:Never mind.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 13:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

If you've gathered all the relevant info and people involved, you may want to go ahead and move on to the WP:Arb next step in the chain. An RFC w/o the subject isn't going to move forward, as everything is voluntary. Soxwon (talk) 03:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

:How? Could you do it? I'm not going to be on anymore.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 15:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

::Under what category should I put? I want to get this through before I leave.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 16:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

:::Should I?Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 17:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

::::I'm not involved with the RFC, nor do I really want to be. See the WP:arb page if you want to move forward. I'll where I can, but I think you might want to reconsider leaving. Soxwon (talk) 17:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

:::::I have been. But which category and should I?Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 17:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

::::::It looks fine as it is, you just need to get other people adding more detailed comments. Soxwon (talk) 19:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

moved from main page. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Topic ban all editors involved (including Noloop)--Lightswitch 23:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Now indefinitely banned as a sockpuppet of User:Free Hans --WebHamster 12:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Please note that this term is much more serious than wiki-"hounding". See the relevant policies. If users can clarify what they mean in the description, and elsewhere, that would be great. Cheers, Ncmvocalist (talk) 09:00, 16 August 2009 (UTC)