Login
Login

Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Indicators#Merger proposal

Edit request on 18 September 2013

{{edit protected||answered=yes}}

Please delete the empty cell after {{impossible}}.

kwan-in (talk) 05:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

:{{done}} Legoktm (talk) 05:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Indicators → {{no redirect|Template:Sockpuppet investigations indicators}} – This one is almost used as template in several template documentations. Image:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted Armbrust The Homunculus 01:59, 4 October 2013 (UTC) kwan-in (talk) 04:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

  • Oppose there is only one transclusion, nothing else uses it as a template, so it is inappropriate to have this in TemplateSpace, as it is a single-use-template. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 06:19, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Edit request on 16 July 2014

{{edit protected|answered=yes}}

Please list the template {{t|Blockedandtagged}} in the "case decisions" section. Passengerpigeon (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

:File:Yes check.svg Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 23:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Merger proposal

I propose to merge Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Indicators into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Indicators. I think the both articles represent exactly the same content. Is there any particular reason why the two articles should be kept separate? --180.64.230.38 (talk) 14:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

:Given that Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser is deprecated, it may be best at this point to keep them separate. --Bsherr (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

::I would probably just slap a {{tl|historical}} on it and be satisfied with that --Trialpears (talk) 14:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

:::I went ahead and simply redirected the RfCU version to the currently maintained version. Mz7 (talk) 06:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)