Wikipedia talk:Top 25 Report#Wager
{{Press
|collapsed=yes
| subject = article
| author = Emily Yahr
| title = Do you fall down a Wikipedia rabbit hole after each episode of 'The Crown'? You're not alone
| org = The Washington Post
| url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2018/01/04/do-you-fall-down-a-wikipedia-rabbit-hole-after-each-episode-of-the-crown-youre-not-alone/
| date = January 4, 2018
| quote = The site confirmed this Wednesday when editors revealed the most-read English Wikipedia articles of 2017, and seemed fascinated by how many on the list had to do with pop culture, particularly TV shows. [...] In a discussion of the site's top 50 articles for 2017, the editor wrote that he was most struck by the queen's prominence on the list, which was "phenomenal when you consider the fame and ubiquity of many of the entries which fall below her." [...] The data was also a revealing glimpse into the viewing habits for Netflix shows, as the streaming service famously refuses to release ratings information. Wikipedia pages for Netflix's controversial teen suicide drama "13 Reasons Why" and sci-fi hit "Stranger Things" also made the most-read list at No. 10 and No. 20, respectively.
| archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20180104204155/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2018/01/04/do-you-fall-down-a-wikipedia-rabbit-hole-after-each-episode-of-the-crown-youre-not-alone/
| archivedate = January 4, 2018
| accessdate = December 17, 2020
| subject2 = article
| author2 = Stephen Harrison
| title2 = The Wikipedia Battle Over the Tragic Death of a Bollywood Star
| org2 = Slate
| url2 = https://slate.com/technology/2020/10/sushant-singh-rajput-suicide-wikipedia-conspiracy-theories.html
| date2 = October 9, 2020
| quote2 = When Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died in September, her Wikipedia article rocketed to the top of the "Top 25 Report," a weekly list of the most popular articles on English Wikipedia [...] According to the Wikipedia volunteers who compile the Top 25 report, only five other articles [besides Sushant Singh Rajput] have ever seen weekly page views pass the 10 million mark[.]
| archiveurl2 = https://web.archive.org/web/20201214033522/https://slate.com/technology/2020/10/sushant-singh-rajput-suicide-wikipedia-conspiracy-theories.html
| archivedate2 = December 14, 2020
| accessdate2 = December 14, 2020
| subject3 = article
| author3 = Andrew Morse
| title3 = COVID-19, presidential election top Wikipedia's most-read articles in 2020
| org3 = CNET
| url3 = https://www.cnet.com/news/covid-presidential-election-top-wikipedias-most-read-articles-in-2020/
| date3 = December 28, 2020
| quote3 = The COVID-19 pandemic and the US presidential election dominated the online encyclopedia's year, with seven articles related to the two broad topics landing in its Top 10 for most-viewed articles of the past 12 months. Those seven articles generated a combined 297 million page views, according to preliminary data provided by the site. The Top 10 generated a combined 396 million page views. (Wikipedia published a blogpost with the Top 25 most-read articles on Monday.) [...] Three articles on the coronavirus -- COVID-19 pandemic, coronavirus and COVID-19 pandemic by country and territory -- netted nearly 145 million page views combined. The articles were Nos. 1, 6 and 8, respectively. More articles on the election made the Top 10, though they were more diverse in terms of topic. Donald Trump, Kamala Harris, Joe Biden and the 2020 United States presidential election racked up 152 million combined views. They ranked Nos. 2, 4, 5 and 9, respectively. Articles on late NBA star Kobe Bryant and Britain's Queen Elizabeth II also made the list, as did an annual article on the year's notable deaths.
| archiveurl3 = https://web.archive.org/web/20201230174031/https://www.cnet.com/news/covid-presidential-election-top-wikipedias-most-read-articles-in-2020/
| archivedate3 = December 30, 2020
| accessdate3 = January 1, 2021
| subject4 = blog
| author4 = ((Ed Erhart))
| title4 = Pandemics and politics: 2020 through the lens of Wikipedia
| org4 = Wikimedia Foundation
| url4 = https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/pandemics-and-politics-2020-wikipedia-420928e9d220
| date4 = December 28, 2020
| quote4 = This is my sixth annual post sharing the list of Wikipedia's most popular articles of the year, and each year I've had to come up with different ways of saying "people really love the latest pop culture" ...
| archiveurl4 = https://web.archive.org/web/20201228163530/https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/pandemics-and-politics-2020-wikipedia-420928e9d220
| archivedate4 = December 28, 2020
| accessdate4 = January 1, 2021
| subject5 = article
| title5 = 10 most-read Wikipedia articles of 2020
| org5 = Gadgets Now
| url5 = https://www.gadgetsnow.com/tech-news/10-most-read-wikipedia-articles-of-2020/articleshow/80165040.cms
| date5 = January 8, 2021
| quote5 = 2020 was also the year when for the first time "in the (short) history of this list, more than 50 articles got over 10 million unique views!", noted Wikipedia. Wikipedia has shared a list of top 50 but here we bring you the top 10.
| accessdate5 = January 10, 2021
| subject6 = article
| author6 = Gwen Aviles
| title6 = 'Avengers', Billie Eilish and Chernobyl among top Wikipedia articles of 2019
| org6 = NBC News
| url6 = https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/pop-culture-news/avengers-billie-eilish-chernobyl-among-top-wikipedia-articles-2019-n1107861
| date6 = December 27, 2019
| quote6 = Film and television dominated Wikipedia's catalog of top 25 most popular articles of the year
| archiveurl6 =
| archivedate6 =
| accessdate6 = April 18, 2021
| authorN =
| titleN =
| orgN =
| urlN =
| dateN =
| quoteN =
| archiveurlN =
| archivedateN =
| accessdateN =
-->
}}
{{Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/Template:Header}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 75K
|counter = 11
|minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(14d)
|archive = Wikipedia talk:Top 25 Report/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Wikipedia talk:Top 25 Report/Archive index |mask=Wikipedia talk:Top 25 Report/Archive index <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes
}}
{{TOC left}}
{{Archives |search=yes|style=width:10em;| auto = long | age=14}}
{{Shortcut|WT:Top25Report|WT:25}}
{{-}}
Report schedule
{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1817522534}}
{{Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/Report history}}
{{clear}}
- Wikipedia:2024 Top 50 Report
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/April 6 to 12, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/April 13 to 19, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/April 20 to 26, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/April 27 to May 3, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/May 4 to 10, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/May 11 to 17, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/May 18 to 24, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/May 25 to 31, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/June 1 to 7, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/June 8 to 14, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/June 15 to 21, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/June 22 to 28, 2025
- Wikipedia:Top 25 Report/June 29 to July 5, 2025
Useful links regarding "random" spikes:
- [https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/top/?sort=top&t=week Reddit's TIL (past 7 days)]
- [https://www.google.com/doodles Google Doodles]
Old Top 50 link?
When linked in to Wikipedia:Top 50 Report from a talk page, it looks like it shows the 2023 Top 50 report (I imagine 2024 would make more sense). I noticed this from template:Top 50 report, but the wikilink seems to take you there regardless. I'm not sure how that works or how to fix it, can someone update it ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 22:02, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
:I have updated it. - 73.140.171.157 (talk) 06:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
::Yay, thanks! ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 15:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Tutorial
@Igordebraga, can you please show me how you compile the Top 25 Report. I’d like to help out with making the list. I appreciate the hard work you put into it every week! GN22 (talk) 16:53, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
:The starting point is easy: there is a link to "[https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/topviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&date=yesterday&excludes= Most viewed pages]" on the template atop the Top 25, clicking on the views brings to the [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2025-03-09&end=2025-03-15&pages=Mark_Carney "views" tab] where you can input the pages and the period. And then comes the hard part of checking each day of the week in one tab and putting pages on the other (which only goes 10 at a time), at times clicking "mobile views" to confirm if something needs to excluded. It was easier when we had bots to do that - First one crashed as soon as 2020 started, a second one stopped mid-2022, a third barely entered 2023 - because otherwise it's doing this process when Saturday becomes Sunday and thus there are 7 days of data. igordebraga ≠ 17:15, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you @Igordebraga! GN22 (talk) 17:16, 16 March 2025 (UTC)