Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Apple Inc.#March 2019 Welcome

Our coverage of modern Macs generally follows the tack of writing about the overall product line (e.g. the iMac line: iMac G3, iMac G4, iMac G5, iMac (Intel-based), iMac (Apple silicon): each covers multiple hardware refreshes.) Our pre-1998 coverage ({{tl|Apple hardware before 1998}}) definitely does not, with for example the PowerBook lines or stuff that was basically only one or two models but each one still has their own page. I wanted to take the temperature on whether anyone had general issue with folding some of these together in the process of expanding them? At present none really have issues with length, and most don't demonstrate any standalone significance (on the above PowerBook 100 FAR a user suggested that the 100's singular importance means it shouldn't be merged, which makes some sense but definitely isn't true of the many random 1XX models, or stuff like the Centris or rebranded Quadras.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 23:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

See Talk:IMac#Rework into a list?. Looking for any feedback. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 01:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Link: Talk:List of iPhone models#Sticky headers for remaining tables. George Ho (talk) 22:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is being held at Talk:iOS version history#iOS support tables on whether or not we should continue to use [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:IPhone_supported_OS_release&oldid=1251837255 this format of tables] as we use on various other articles as well (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc.) over [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:IPhone_supported_OS_release&oldid=1251904683 this format]. Extra opinions would be great. YannickFran (talk) 21:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

MacBook (2006–2012) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 23:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Adds a little icon to the top of your profile you cans see it on mine.

If you want a song released as single, you have to use album instead of song

so,

for a single song,

{{Apple Music topicon|album=not-like-us/1744776162?I=1744776167} - the "not-like-us-single" is the album the "1744776162?I=1744776167" has to be done this way

That was Kendricks song in the Super Bowl destroying Drake

for a song,

{{Apple Music topicon|song=squabble-up/1781270321}

for a album,

{{Apple Music topicon|album=not-like-us}

for the artist,

{{Apple Music topicon|artist=kendrick-lamar/368183298}

make sure the it ends in two "}" not one Luka Maglc (talk) 08:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Apple_logo_black.svg A discussion related to Apple Inc. is currently taking place at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea_lab)#iPad models consistency issue Since you are an active participant of the Apple Inc WikiProject, you are more than weclome to participate in the discussion. Thanks! TzarN64 (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

I read in this French article ([https://www.journaldulapin.com/2025/05/09/clavier-a1048-usb/]) about the Apple Keyboard A1018. It seems that there was a mistake in the present WP article. It says that a common error (first edited on Wikipedia?) is to believe that Apple has updated the A1018 with USB 2.0 in 2005. It is wrong according to the article. Since the publication of this article, the information was removed from the WP page by an IP (not me). I would like to know if this French site can be used as a secondary source. It is only based on supposition, but many tech sites use Wikipedia, so the error spreads across the web. Let's mention that the WP text is not sourced at all.

I am unfamiliar with WP en and only contribute in French. That's why I am asking.

Best regards, Gabon100 (talk) 13:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)