Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball#Articles for the Wikipedia 1.0 project

It's disturbing how poorly sourced this BLP about an otherwise famous person can be. Bearian (talk) 18:27, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

: You have every opportunity to improve the article. Dmoore5556 (talk) 01:48, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

An editor is adding unsourced attendance figures to the Ottawa Titans article. Any assistance in maintaining the article is appreciated. isaacl (talk) 22:12, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|Isaacl}} That account is a sockpuppet of WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaepertank as evidenced by the existing fr.wiki block shown in the global account log. Left guide (talk) 23:52, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Ian Kinsler has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

: I've made some improvements to try to resolve the concerns but as a Royals fan I didn't follow Kinsler all that closely during his career. Any Rangers or Tigers fans who want to take a look at this as well? Hog Farm _Talk 23:17, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

A new user seems to have created a category for ":Category:MLB eventual champion elimination seasons" which seems really unnecessary. Be on the lookout. Spanneraol (talk) 22:51, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|Spanneraol}} …as well as ":Category:NBA eventual champion elimination seasons" and ":Category:NHL eventual champion elimination seasons". Left guide (talk) 23:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::Not a useful category. I can't think why anyone would need to know this. --Jameboy (talk) 23:26, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

• Nominated for deletion at WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 May 29#Eventual champion elimination seasons. Left guide (talk) 00:25, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ogden Gunners#Requested move 22 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 12:58, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Jac Caglianone was a unanimous selection for the 2024 College Baseball All-America Team as a utility player, but he was also named a first-team All-American by 3 of the 4 selectors for the 2023 College Baseball All-America Team but at a different position for each team (1B, DH, and UT). Caglianone should probably be listed as a consensus All-American. The NCAA DI record book that I found does not include All-American teams, but I do know that for football they go off first place mentions to determine the consensus teams and do not take position into account. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

:It's not necessarily uniform across sports. There needs to coverage about widely-accepted consensus selectors. For example, 2025 NCAA Women's Basketball All-Americans says they don't have consensus designations. —Bagumba (talk) 16:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

::True. Additionally, if there isn't any coverage regarding consensus All-American status for baseball then we should revise the AA team articles and also delete the associated navboxes as they are WP:SYNTHed conclusions rather than a recognized consensus AA team. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Can some people here work on the Shigeo Nagashima article? It was nominated at ITN for a requested death posting, but it is woefully under-referenced. Natg 19 (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|Natg 19}} [https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/長嶋茂雄#外部リンク ja.wiki's got plenty of sources] (199 total references as of this moment), for those knowledgeable and inclined enough to translate sources. Left guide (talk) 04:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Buster Posey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

There is an IP editor at Vladimir Guerrero Jr. who appears to be trying to make a point by removing Dominican citizenship from Vlad's article, possibly based on some slight at the Manny Machado article. Can someone investigate this. Mindmatrix 13:48, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

:Is he actually Dominican? All the sources I've read state that he is a Canadian citizen who was raised in the DR. 162 etc. (talk) 16:14, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

::Indeed, he was raised in the DR. He signed with the Blue Jays as an international free agent. Whereas Manny is from Miami and was selected in the MLB draft as an American player. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

:See also Dominican Republic nationality law. Mindmatrix 14:37, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

I have nominated Moe Berg for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 14:14, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

This has been unsourced for decades. Could somebody please add reliable sources? You could earn points at Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Backlog drives/June 2025. Bearian (talk) 01:51, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

:[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defensive_substitution&diff=prev&oldid=1295318879] {{thumbs up}} – Muboshgu (talk) 01:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

In [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Baseball/Archive_52#Hits_in_infobox this discussion] from just over a month ago, I raised the question of whether hits should be listed in the infobox stats. While participation was very limited, {{u|Bagumba}} pointed out WP:BASESTYLEPL, which indicates that only triple crown stats should be used unless {{tq|there is another statistic that is representative of the player's career}}. After that discussion ran its course, I began removing hits for players who had less than 1,000 hits. For instance, Riley Greene only recently reached the 400 hit plateau for his career, but my removal of hits from his infobox has been twice reverted without explanation ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riley_Greene&diff=prev&oldid=1293171281], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riley_Greene&diff=prev&oldid=1295564647]) by {{u|BaseballFanatic1}}. Clearly we need to establish a consensus here. What is the minimum baseline for including a player's hits in the infobox? Personally, I favor 1,000 hits as the minimum baseline for inclusion. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 17:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

:Personally, I favor 300 or 400 as the minimum baseline for hits because I don't wait way too long to add hits on certain players' infobox stats. There's any way to agreed to that or what? Answer me back as you aren't too busy to answer to my question. Thank you and good day. BaseballFanatic1 (talk) 18:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

::It's not really feasible to base Wikipedia guidance on how long individual editors are willing to wait before making a change. Total hits is a rough proxy for a player's long-term ability to contribute to team offense. Thus in my view, a rough threshold should be set at a level where the player's longevity becomes a key characteristic of their career. isaacl (talk) 18:26, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Second this^^ Otherwise, the amount of hits is little more than the inclusion of trivia. Alyo (chat·edits) 14:10, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm not sure if there should be a mandatory lower bound - there are at least a few pages, mostly those of players who didn't have an extensive career, where one could argue it makes less sense to use all the triple crown stats instead of some combination of hits / plate appearances / runs / homers / RBIs. On the other hand, though, I don't see any reason that Green's hit total should be reported in the infobox, and even adding it for all players who reach 1,000 seems low - it's a nice milestone, I'm sure, but certainly not on the level of 3,000 (or even 2,000) hits, 500 home runs, or 1,000 RBIs. Hatman31 (he/him · talk · contribs) 02:05, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

I'd put it at 2,000 hits. Seems to be a point of drawing headlines.[https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/6841373/texas-rangers-michael-young-reaches-2000-hit-club-thanks-hard-work]—Bagumba (talk) 11:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

It would appear that {{u|BaseballFanatic1}} is continuing to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1295998332&oldid=1295791863&title=Riley_Greene revert without discussion (or use of edit summaries)]. Do we need to formally convert this into an RfC in order to get an official result that will be enforceable on our articles? LEPRICAVARK (talk) 12:04, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:I've restored the discussion link there, as this is still ongoing. —Bagumba (talk) 12:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:No per WP:NOTBURO, an RfC isn't any more "enforceable" than regular discussion, no need to escalate to an RfC unless there's a valid content reason why the discussion could benefit from wider participation. If a single user is being disruptive regarding disputed content without or against consensus, warn, and raise at WP:ANI if it persists. {{u|BaseballFanatic1}}, please stop adding hits to infoboxes for players with less than 1000 until a consensus is reached, and please stop removing valid maintenance templates for active issues. Instead, continue discussing here, thank you. Left guide (talk) 15:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

::I agree that there's nothing magical about an RfC, but they do tend to draw a little bit more participation. I'd like to get more input here from other talk page watchers before I go around removing hits from infoboxes again. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 13:29, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

:I oppose hits being in the infobox unless a player has/had either (1) nearly or greater than 3,000 hits, or (2) no home runs or runs batted in in his career. I came here because I saw Julio Rodríguez had his 555 career hits in his infobox. This seems ridiculous. It only really seems reasonable for guys like Bill Buckner or Milo Allison. --Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 01:19, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

::Personally, I wouldn't support a no home runs or RBIs criterion, or the earlier suggestion of someone without an extensive career. I think any one in these categories doesn't have a key characteristic of contributing over the long term to team offense, by definition. isaacl (talk) 02:15, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

::{{tqq|nearly or greater than 3,000 hits}}: "nearly" gets subjective; I suggested 2,000+ (above). —Bagumba (talk) 04:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

:::It's subjective but not unreasonably subjective. But if we're going to use a definite minimum, I'd opt for something closer to 2,750 than 2,000. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

::::I think you are drawing the line higher than most would. Others seem to favor 2,000, while I prefer 1,000. At any rate, I think it is becoming clear that 300-400 is unacceptably low. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 13:26, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::Looking at [https://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/H_career.shtml Baseball Reference's leaderboard for hits]:

:::::* The top 999 players have at least 1241 hits.

:::::* The lowest number of seasons played for players in the top 999 and below 2000 hits is 9 (based on a quick scan).

:::::* The lowest active player in the top 999 is J.T. Realmuto (#928, 12 seasons, 1292 hits).

:::::* The highest active player below 2000 hits is Manny Machado (#306, 14 seasons, 1987 hits).

:::::* Mike Trout is at #492, 15 seasons, 1689 hits.

:::::* Mookie Betts is at #496, 12 seasons, 1683 hits. Nick Castellanos is tied at #496, 13 seasons.

:::::* Highest active player is Freddie Freeman (#139, 16 seasons, 2346 hits).

:::::* Lowest number of seasons played for players above 2000 hits is 13 (based on a quick scan). (Kirby Puckett is one of those players, but of course he was forced to retire early while still garnering high annual hit totals.)

:::::* There are 297 players with at least 2000 hits.

:::::* There are 33 players with at least 3000 hits. (Roberto Clemente, #33, 18 seasons, 3000 hits)

:::::* There are 69 players with at least 2700 hits.

:::::* There are 83 players with at least 2600 hits.

:::::* There are 101 players with at least 2500 hits.

:::::* Players between 2600-2700 hits: Gary Sheffield, Fred Clarke, Luis Aparicio, George Davis, Max Carey, Nellie Fox, Harry Hellmann, Ted Williams, Lave Cross, Jimmie Foxx, Jim O'Rourke, Robinson Cano, Tim Raines, Rabbit Maranville.

:::::* Players between 2500-2600 hits: Steve Garvey, Ed Delahanty, Luis Gonzalez, Vladimir Guerrero, Julio Franco, Reggie Jackson, Ernie Banks, Richie Ashburn, Manny Ramirez, Willie Davis, Steve Finley, George Van Haltren, Garret Anderson, Heinie Manush, Todd Helton, Joe Morgan, Buddy Bell, Jimmy Ryan.

:::::* Just the hall of famers between 2400-2500 hits: Fred McGriff, David Ortiz, Joe Medwick, Frank Thomas, Roger Connor, Harry Hooper, Ozzie Smith, Lloyd Waner, Jim Rice, Red Schoendienst, Pie Traynor, Mickey Mantle.

:::::I leave it as an exercise for the reader to check other thresholds. I think 3000 seems a bit high, and 1000 seems a bit low. isaacl (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

I keep seeing people writing John Doe slashed .309/.398/.782 in text for player articles... I keep trying to fix these but cant keep up with the multitude of articles that are using that phrasing... We really should avoid typing "slashed" or at the very least link to the slash line definition on first usage cause otherwise regular non baseballs stathead readers wont have any idea what it means or what any of those numbers mean unless we explain them. Batting average is more or less explainable... but if you use slashed you have to explain what those numbers are. Spanneraol (talk) 02:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:I would have objected say a decade ago to its usage, but it seems to have become mainstream in general sources now. Definitely link to the term. Is there enough info for its own standalone page (I dont follow baseball too deeply these days)? —Bagumba (talk) 03:00, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:The character combinations seem both unique and common enough that linking the term should be doable semi-automatedly via WP:AWB/WP:JWB if anyone is up for the task. Left guide (talk) 03:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

::One could also try at Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks. —Bagumba (talk) 04:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Yes, that was on my mind too. Example coding would be "replace" {{code|slashed .3}} and "with" {{code|slashed .3}}. Left guide (talk) 04:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:There's also inaccurate text like {{tqq|batting .277/.326/.444}}[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jackson_Merrill&oldid=1294788285#cite_ref-q031_11-0:~:text=batting%20.277/.326/.444%20with%2015%20home%20runs%2C%2064%20RBI%2C%20and%2015%20stolen%20bases] —Bagumba (talk) 04:39, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:This was last discussed in September 2022 (with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Baseball/Style_advice&diff=prev&oldid=1109297245 style advice page updated] as a result). I raised the issue that the corresponding glossary item doesn't actually define what stats are included; it just says what is typical. I think it would be desirable to avoid ambiguity and spell out the stats as {{nowrap|"{{nowrap|(BA}}}}/OBP/{{nowrap|{{nowrap|SLG)}}"}}, perhaps using a template for convenience. isaacl (talk) 04:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

::Create {{t|Slashed}} perhaps? Left guide (talk) 04:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

::I was apprehensive before when it was more limited to advanced stats coverage, but slashed is now in mainstream sources, e.g. [https://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/story/2025-05-13/ucla-baseball#:~:text=slashed%20.466/.577/.970 LA Times], [https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/45527551/shohei-ohtani-pitches-hits-game-first-23#:~:text=slashed%20.277/.379/.585 ESPN] —Bagumba (talk) 05:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Those are passing mentions though, which seem pretty common and routine in mainstream sources. Is there any in-depth coverage about the statistic itself that can be used to flesh out a standalone article? Left guide (talk) 05:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

::::I was only establishing that its usage is common. They weren't for establishing notability beyond a glossary entry. —Bagumba (talk) 05:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::But above you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Baseball&diff=prev&oldid=1295986817 asked] {{tqq|Is there enough info for its own standalone page?}} LOL. Left guide (talk) 05:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::Yes, I was asking a question there. But the sources I presented were a response to spelling out "(BA/OBP/SLG)", not a proposal to make it a standalone. —Bagumba (talk) 05:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::I think we should provide clear definitions of listed numbers for general readers who don't ordinarily read baseball news articles. isaacl (talk) 06:04, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::Agreed, this aligns with WP:MTAU: {{tq2|Strive to make each part of every article as understandable as possible to the widest audience of readers who are likely to be interested in that material.}} Left guide (talk) 07:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::Are there examples from books on how they introduce slash lines to the reader? Otherwise, it might be best to first introduce those terms w/o a slash line, and then later mention can combine them in a slash line e.g. {{tqq|As a rookie, Smith had a .250 batting average (BA) with a .325 on-base percentage (OBP) and .400 slugging percentage (SLG) ... He was an All-Star in 2020, when he had a BA/OBP/SLG slash line of .290/.380/.480.}} —Bagumba (talk) 08:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::{{yo|Bagumba}} In [https://books.google.com/books?id=BM2rDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT38&dq=%22slash+line%22+baseball&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjyiJW_6viNAxX9IUQIHXCVJNY4ChDoAXoECAQQAw#v=onepage&q=%22slash%20line%22%20baseball&f=false this book] about the 1995 Cleveland Indians, there's a series of a few pages with slash line statistics using various filters and conditions, with some commentary for each one. One of my initial thoughts is that the material may be better suited for the '95 Indians page rather than a general slash line page, but YMMV which is why I'm mentioning it here. Left guide (talk) 16:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::I think the suggestion from Bagumba above makes the most sense... I've just seen a lot more of this useage in baseball bios in the last year by a few editors in particular without any attempt to explain what the numbers mean. Would be good if we could devise a standard that can be used for this type of thing. Spanneraol (talk) 16:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::A template akin to {{t|Win-loss record}} comes to mind; it automates a hover option with an appropriate explanation. Left guide (talk) 16:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::Hovers don't work on mobile, which is what over half the readers use. —Bagumba (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::That aligns with my preference not to use "slash" as a verb, and to provide an explanation on first use of terms. So start with explaining batting average, on-base percentage, and slugging percentage, and then later uses can be a bit more concise. In Bagumba's example, I think "slash line" is redundant and so could be dropped, but I appreciate that using the term would help introduce it to editors unfamiliar with it. (In written text, I don't think there's a significant advantage in using "slash line" over "BA/OBP/SLG", but I appreciate when spoken it's easier.) isaacl (talk) 02:11, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::Slash line might be avoidable in some cases, but for a player with a longer career, using slash line or slashed will read more naturally for those familiar with baseball than constantly repeating "BA/OBP/SLG" (esp. since the project continues to exclude career stats tables for convenient reference). —Bagumba (talk) 02:57, 18 June 2025 (UTC)