Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer security

{{talk header|sc1=WT:COMPSEC|wp=yes}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|

{{WikiProject Computer Security}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(90d)

| archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer security/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 5

| maxarchivesize = 150K

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 4

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

|target=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer Security/Archive index

|mask= Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer Security/Archive <#>

|leading_zeros=0

|indexhere=yes}}

Move discussion of interest

Cyberwarfare by China is part of this WikiProject and there is a move discussion on that article that may be of interest to those here. - Amigao (talk) 23:50, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

When should CVEs warrant their own article?

I've been editing Wikipedia long enough to have noticed a distinct lack of CVE related articles until they are given a proper name, e.g. CVE-2014-0160, better known as HeartBleed. Would we need anything different from the standard WP:GNG? Could we try writing a WP:SNG? guninvalid (talk) 17:35, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

:The internal compass that I typically use is that the vast majority of individual CVEs are not-notable unless they have spurred extensive coverage in non-technical/technical mainstream sources. (Think heartbleed, zenbleed etc) If you do want to write about vulnerabilities, find a few (i.e > 1) research papers about it and write about a exploit class instead of a singular exploit/CVE. Sohom (talk) 19:59, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Request for feedback on Draft Article: Rob T Lee

Hi, I’m working on a draft article about Rob T. Lee, a cybersecurity expert specializing in digital forensics and incident response. I would greatly appreciate any feedback on how to improve the article, especially in terms of technical accuracy or notability. Here's the draft: Draft:Rob T. Lee. Thank you! BmwPersonaMedia (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Request for help with [[Suricata (software)]]

Suricata (software) looks like it would never have passed WP:AfC or WP:AfD. It would be greatly appreciated if interested editors would help to improve the article. guninvalid (talk) 16:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC)