Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Economics#Vanderford-Riley well-being schedule

{{talk header|WT:ECON|search=yes}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|

{{WikiProject Economics}}

}}

{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-12-19/WikiProject report|writer= Mabeenot| ||day =19|month=December|year=2011}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 200K

|counter = 10

|minthreadsleft = 20

|algo = old(90d)

|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Economics/Archive %(counter)d

}}

The Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment

Perhaps someone from this WikiProject could take a look at :The Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment and assess it (particularly with respect to :WP:NORG and :WP:NOBLE). The article was created directly in the main space by a student participating in a :WP:WEP affiliated university course; so, it never really underwent any type of formal assessment (e.g. :WP:AFC) and it doesn't seem to have yet been reviewed by :WP:NPP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:04, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

:I think either WP:WikiProject Law or WP:WikiProject Environmentalism should be more helpful here; the topic seems only tangentially related to economics. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 17:37, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

[[Built-in inflation]]

This timely topic's article has not been sourced in-5 years. Let's find and add reliable sources to this. It's possible that many of our core users will come here looking for secondary sources. Bearian (talk) 17:58, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

:Hmm, looks like it needs a merge with inertial inflation.– Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

::I've proposed that. Bearian (talk) 01:56, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Offensive rejection of topic.

Janosabel (talk) and you have been an editor for long enough to know about WP:NOTORUM, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:RGW and WP:ADVOCACY

I protest against this knee-jerk judgement. Janosabel (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

:The contribution [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Economics&diff=prev&oldid=1272869978 that I deleted] was this

Economics should be a public social science.

Why I say this: As a self-taught economist I learned by the age of 87 that economics, as conventionally understood, exists to exploit civil society.

One evidence in support of this claim is the fact that abundance in everything essential for a good life has been possible for at least a hundred years (since the end of the first world war). Why is the twenty first century not an age of abundance? It is not, as Louis Kelso, of Capitalist Manifesto fame, pointed out 50 years ago. (refs. providable)

~~~~ Janosabel (talk) 14:19, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

: If a convincing argument can be made that this contribution passes WP:NOTFORUM, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:RGW and WP:ADVOCACY, even on a WikiProject talk page, I'll eat my hat with extra fries. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reiner Kümmel]]

This deletion debate may be of interest to the community here. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:27, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

[[Competitor indexing]]

This stub has been unsourced for 15 years. Can somebody please find and add reliable sources to it? Bearian (talk) 02:04, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

[[Ed Yardeni]]

I just created Ed Yardeni. It may be of interest to members of this project. Thriley (talk) 19:54, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Should section [[Trade route#Maritime Jade Road]] be blanked?

Your feedback would be appreciated at Talk:Trade route#Should section Maritime Jade Road be blanked?. Mathglot (talk) 22:52, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Trade route]]

Trade route has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

[[Top Five Journals in Economics]]

Could some knowledgeable editors have a look at this? Is this Top Five a "thing" or just the subject of a research article? Comments welcome! Thanks, --Randykitty (talk) 14:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

:It's a "thing" (see [https://www.aeaweb.org/research/charts/publishing-promotion-economics-top-five here]). – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 16:58, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Central bankers that became national leaders

Is there a list of these?

  • Mario Draghi (Governor of the Bank of Italy -> Prime Minister of Italy)
  • Mark Carney (Governor of the Bank of Canada, England, World Financial Stability Board -> Prime Minister of Canada)
  • others?

-- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

:I don't think there should be such a list, as it is arbitrary to combine a few characteristics into a SQL search query. E.g. billionaires who became millionaires, or finance ministers that served for corruption. --Gunnar (talk) 11:26, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at [[Talk:2025 United States trade war with Canada and Mexico#Requested move 4 April 2025]]

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2025 United States trade war with Canada and Mexico#Requested move 4 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neostalkedits) 13:05, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at [[Talk:State Socialism (Germany)#Requested move 11 April 2025]]

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:State Socialism (Germany)#Requested move 11 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 11:07, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Mathematical economics]]

Mathematical economics has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Production–possibility frontier]]

Production–possibility frontier has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

[[Marginal propensity to import]]

This unsourced stub appears to be more important than ever. Please add reliable sources . Bearian (talk) 10:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

:Honestly this is so arbitrary that it's better off removed. It's all based on the import function which is basically magic pixie dust. 199.255.150.243 (talk) 13:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

::And by that I mean the import func follows fiscal policy and not the other way around. Plus no sources. 199.255.150.243 (talk) 13:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Forward exchange rate]]

Forward exchange rate has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

[[Universe (economics)]]

Here's another economics-stub tagged as unsourced for 15 and 1/2 years. This is a chance to win points at Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Backlog drives/June 2025. Bearian (talk) 21:30, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Nominating a good article reassessment: [[Modern monetary theory|Modern Monetary Theory]]

(First timer, I think this is how I should engage but let me know if not.)

The current article needs an overhaul. It does not accurately reflect the position of the school of thought. I believe it would be useful if this project were to help contribute towards improving it. MwikiNpedia (talk) 06:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Manuel Belgrano]]

Manuel Belgrano has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:11, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Feminist economics]]

Feminist economics has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[International Development Association]]

International Development Association has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:08, 5 July 2025 (UTC)