Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week#Lack of consensus.3F

{{WikiProject Editor Retention Editor of the Week/Header}}

{{Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Nominations}}

{{archives

|auto=short

|search=yes

|index=User:ClueBot III/Master Detailed Indices/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week

|title=Archive index

|bot=ClueBot III

}}

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis

|archiveprefix=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Archive

|format= %%i

|age=480

|minarchthreads=1

|maxarchsize=150000

|header={{aan}}

|index=no

|archivebox=no

|box-advert=yes

}}

__TOC__

{{Clear right}}

{{WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Project main page}}

Nominations are needed

I just want to continue to thank the many editors that obviously have this page on their watchlists. It gives me a sense of well-being knowing that there are friends out there that are ready and willing to participate in this on-going salute to our fellow editors. With today's awarding, the Queue of nominations has slipped under four. It's time to shake the editor trees of the thousands of editors that deserve a simple pat on the back. Buster7 Chat 15:27, 16 May 2025 (UTC)