Wikipedia talk:WikiProject France#Should there be a Paris WikiProject.3F
{{Wikipedia: WikiProject France/Tabs}}
{{talk header|wp=yes|shortcut=WT:FRANCE}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject France}}
}}
{{France sources notice|France}}
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Navigation}}
{{archives|search=yes|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=120|list=
- Nov 2006 - Jan 2007
- Jan 2007 - Feb 2007
- Feb 2007 - Aug 2008
- Aug 2008 - Nov 2010
- Nov 2010 - May 2011
- May 2011 - Sep 2020
- Sep 2020 -
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(120d)
| archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject France/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 8
| maxarchivesize = 200K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
{{see also2|Discussion du Projet France (Français)}}
How to write a TOESE
Topic sentence
One reason
Evidence
Second reason
Evidence
Versailles in the Paris task force?
Hi there hello, so I just spontaneously joined the Paris task force and got into tagging "Paris-related" articles, but I wonder whether or not articles that are "Versailles-related" should be tagged and improved as well. I'd be happy if anybody'd give me the answer to that. Update: I'll just tag the "Versailles-related" ones, just tell me if I shouldn't :) - CarolingianCitizen (talk) 10:02, 7 August 2022 (CET)
Good article reassessment for [[Morea expedition]]
Morea expedition has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk)
Article needed: ''Les Veilleurs''
{{excerpt|WT:LGBT|Article needed: Les Veilleurs}}
New Article
Hey, I am currently working on an article and was wondering if I could get some help. I'm trying to get it to at least B-Class. The article is Draft:Honorary consulates of France. If you have any questions, talk to me! Vestrix (talk) 20:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
France Flag information template update
In the Other versions section of :File:Flag of France.svg, the lighter blue flag should be changed to 1976 instead of 1975. The current Flag of France article also says so. The darker blue flag should also be changed to 1976 instead of 1975. Synchronize to 1830-1976 instead of 1830-1974.
Also, the reference source from SHOM used on this page is no longer valid. I hope it can be updated. 2401:E180:8D05:2477:DB91:A92F:442C:8D06 (talk) 09:25, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
:I only want to modify the start time of use of the lighter blue Flag, which is 1976.
:Although this also required the use of the dark blue flag to be changed from 1830-1974 to 1830-1976. 2401:E180:8810:ECEB:E17A:44F7:996A:3E05 (talk) 14:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at [[Talk:2024 French political crisis#Requested move 16 January 2025]]
File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 French political crisis#Requested move 16 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. CNC (talk) 01:24, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at [[Talk:France Bleu Breizh Izel#Requested move 13 January 2025]]
File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:France Bleu Breizh Izel#Requested move 13 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 16:03, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
House de Nuchèze
Should House de Nuchèze be listed for AfD? It looks like it does not meet notability. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
:Absolutely. Article has been moved backwards and forwards between main space and draft space a couple of times at least, without significant improvements being made. Kiwipete (talk) 02:25, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at [[Talk:France Bleu Breizh Izel#Requested move 13 January 2025]]
File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:France Bleu Breizh Izel#Requested move 13 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 12:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[: Michel Arnaud]]
The article : Michel Arnaud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
notability, doesn't cite sources, but almost 20 year old article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Delectopierre (talk) 04:04, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at [[Talk:Bar (river)#Requested move 25 February 2025]]
File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Bar (river)#Requested move 25 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 08:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Louis XVIII]]
Louis XVIII has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:39, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Can someone summarize a French review?
Mentioned in the book The Use and Abuse of History: Or How the Past Is Taught. My French is not good enough for that, and the source is not easily machine translatable. Just a 2-3 sentences will do - what did the reviewer think about the book, etc. This is scheduled to be DYKed soon and it would be nice to have that mention expanded. TIA. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:11, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
:Not easy to summarize, this is a long and dense review. The reviewer addresses many points (mostly critically) but does not give an overall appreciation. GrandEscogriffe (talk) 16:20, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
How to send a draft in for a review?
I made an article about Sophie of France, Marie Antoinette’s last child. How do I send it for review? Letthemeatfood (talk) 15:37, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Alexander Alekhine]]
Alexander Alekhine has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:46, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[National Rally]]
National Rally has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:16, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at [[Talk:Rachel Morin#Requested move 15 April 2025]]
File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Rachel Morin#Requested move 15 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Valorrr (lets chat) 02:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Foreign relations of New Caledonia
Hi there, I was wondering if Wikipedia should create a Foreign relations of New Caledonia page. Currently, the page redirects to New Caledonia. As an overseas department of France, France is responsible for the territory's defence, foreign relations, law and order, monetary policy and tertiary education. New Caledonia retains some degree of self-autonomy and has its own Congress and various provincial and local governments. I had a look at some sources from the [https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/australia-and-pacific/new-caledonia New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade], the [https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/new-caledonia/new-caledonia-country-brief Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade] and a [https://www.newcaledonia-business.com/foreign-relations business group]. Under the framework of the Nouméa Accord, New Caledonia conducts some limited degree of foreign relations. It has been a member of the Pacific Islands Forum since 2016 and also participates in the South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP), and the Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC). New Caledonia also has official representatives who are embedded at the French Embassies in Australia, Fiji, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and Vanuatu. Australia, Indonesia, New Zealand and Vanuatu have consulate-generals in New Caledonia while Japan also has a consulate. New Caledonia is also an associate member of La Francophonie and is a non-voting member of the World Health Organization's Western Pacific Regional Committee. Not sure whether I should create one for Wikipedia. Wanted to get some advice from people who are more knowledgeable of the topic. Andykatib (talk) 05:38, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
:Yes, there is enough in the general Pacific relations for a separate article. Newystats (talk) 10:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
::{{Ping|Newystats}}, thanks for your advice. Will start a draft article soon. Cheers. Feel free to help as well. Andykatib (talk) 19:26, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
:::Hi {{Ping|Newystats}}, have started work on Draft:Foreign relations of New Caledonia. I will add in some content about the three referenda and the 2024 New Caledonia unrest later. Let me know what you think about the draft article in its present form. Cheers. Andykatib (talk) 19:34, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Request for help: Leonard Willey
Is there anyone who could help with Draft:Leonard Willey? This was requested by an editor a long time ago so I went ahead and created an article but whereas usually I do not struggle to find sources I am really struggling with this one, anyone has any idea where I could potentially look? Please feel free to edit the draft as well. The only wiki there is a mainspace article is fr wiki but cannot find any sources there really? Abcmaxx (talk) 18:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Battle of Waterloo]]
Battle of Waterloo has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2025 (UTC)