Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Graffiti

Many pages already carry promotional tone intended to give favorable light. I thought it maybe more encyclopedic to just cluster individuals together into one page under their moniker, such as for MOOK. I welcome input. Graywalls (talk) 04:30, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

The article A.C.A.B. was woefully undersourced and appeared to be "things people believe based on word of mouth" vice properly-sourced WP:V material. I've managed to cite a lot of material and remove uncited, and added WikiProjects to the page. The image for the article is not a very good example though, so if someone has a better image that'd be great. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:40, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Looks much better. Great job! The new image looks perfectly adequate too. Sionk (talk) 10:35, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow graffiti heads :) I'm new to Wikipedia so rather than me running around on every page & getting loose on the edit button I'm putting my efforts to learn more on only 2 pages. 1 page I created called Graffiti Kings & the 2nd page that relates to Graffiti Kings of artist Darren Cullen. My edits keep getting taken down & I'm told its because my writing sounds to promotional or spammy? Is there anyone on here that would kindly help me add good content to these pages. Thanks in advance Sarah1971 12:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi people :) I could really do with your help as the page Graffiti Kings Im working on has now been given a Notability Box attached to it. Its asking for more reliable, secondary sources about the topic to be added. I have added many web links in the talk page if this helps.

Thanks in advance Sarah1971 16:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

I've created an alternative version of the project's logo that has a transparent background and have the spiked extended and made black.

100px

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 15:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

:Cool – great work! Wikociewie (talk) 07:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

I’ve noticed that although the project’s template is displaying ‘semi-active’ on the project page it’s showing ‘(inactive)’ on individual article talk pages. Not sure how to change this - any ideas @Notcharizard? Wikociewie (talk) 07:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

:Yes, I’d noticed this too. There doesn’t seem to be any space to change the status in the template code. I read this info on activity statuses but didn’t fully understand - it seems like semi-active may be classed as a type of inactive? -- NotCharizard ^🗨 11:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

::Nice to see a bit of, er, activity anyway :) Sionk (talk) 23:22, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

::Hooray! I think I’ve sorted it! Wikociewie (talk) 13:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)