Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy#Christian violence

File:Information.svg

There's an RfC on whether the current article is consistent with NPOV and a second RfC on whether to keep the current lead or replace it. The topic is related to philosophy of medicine and disease concepts. LogicalLens (talk) 06:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, everyone! I have recently nominated the classical theism article. I am currently looking for a person willing to perform a review. Brent Silby (talk) 12:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

This stub has been unreferenced and unimproved for 15 years. I think it's been mis-tagged as well. Can somebody please think of the children, and add a few reliable sources? Thanks. I've cross-listed thus at WP:Psych. Bearian (talk) 20:21, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

:I've looked at the article and nominated it for deletion. As best I can tell, judgmental language is not standardly classified as a fallacy. (Or, if anyone has good sources to the contrary and can update the article a little bit, I'll happily withdraw the nomination.) Cheers, Patrick (talk) 18:44, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Theism is a level 4 vital article. It is also a very commonly used word in various religious/philosophical debates. Despite all of this, the article is in an abysmal state, being rated as "start-class" (the second lowest rating on the Wikipedia content assessment scale). This article would greatly benefit from some improvements. Brent Silby (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:David Kelley#Requested move 21 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 22:59, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

While reviewing math articles, I tripped over the article Uses of trigonometry which seems to be some kind of original research into the history of trigonometry, or the sociology of it, or some history of engineering, or I don't know what. It's certainly terrible as a math article per se, and I'm not sure what to do with it. It could be PRODed and AfD'ed of course, but perhaps it could be turned into a worthwhile article in epistomology or something like that. I'm posting this note in several other wikiprojects, as I'm not sure what else to do with it. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 05:01, 3 May 2025 (UTC)