Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics/Archive June 2017

Just a heads up that we'll likely have someone that's WP:NOTHERE going on an arxiv purge. I'm not quite sure what their problem is, but they clearly are not interest in constructive dialogue. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

:To their question [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AFaster-than-light&type=revision&diff=784316278&oldid=784308048 "Who are the people making the decisions here, what gives them the right?"] I have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATheCampaignForRealPhysics&type=revision&diff=784322304&oldid=784320195 answered] on their user talk, as the article talk page thread was already closed. - DVdm (talk) 17:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

There's currently a discussion about whether or not the lead of Isaac Newton in popular culture is too detailed. Please comment. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

There is now an RFC on it. Please comment. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Barnett (4th nomination). Xxanthippe (talk) 22:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC).

:Oh yes, the hidden agenda of physicists are finally uncovered and therefore they are indicted of conspiratively running deletionists' activities against this heartwarming article about a prodigy child. Currently viewfinder and friends summon to a final blow. Purgy (talk) 06:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Someone from this project should probably review this AfC draft. Probably not the kind of thing your run-of-the-mill AfC folks are really going to be able to accurately evaluate. TimothyJosephWood 16:56, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

:{{done}} I just accepted it as Nanoscale vacuum-channel transistor. --Steve (talk) 02:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)