Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Draft RFC ideas

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|maxarchivesize = 80K

|counter = 44

|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{Shortcut|WT:UKGEO}}

{{talkheader|search=y}}

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/Announcements}}

__TOC__

Archives

Disagreement on Christchurch article re:settlement definition

There is a dispute at the article for Christchurch, Dorset over whether, how, and in how much detail, the article should cover Bournemouth Airport – a major employer which was in the now defunct borough of Christchurch, but some distance outside the built-up area in a neighbouring parish. This is essentially a difference of opinion on how to handle the ambiguity around defining settlements. If you think you can help resolve this, join the discussion at Talk:Christchurch,_Dorset#Bournemouth_airport. Thanks, Joe D (t) 10:38, 3 April 2022‎ (UTC)

Birmingham move discussion

You might be interested in the current move request for Birmingham. G-13114 (talk) 07:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Aberdaron]]

Aberdaron has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:28, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Orkney]]

Orkney has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:17, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

FAR notice for [[Navenby]]

I have nominated Navenby for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:15, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Romford]]

Romford has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 03:44, 24 May 2025 (UTC)